mirror of
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/emacs.git
synced 2024-12-11 09:20:51 +00:00
a8d6af5812
(Signaling Errors): Provide some more details on how `signal' constructs the error message. Add anchor to the definition of `signal'. (Error Symbols): Describe special treatment of `quit'. (Cleanups): Rename BODY argument of `unwind-protect' to BODY-FORM to emphasize that it has to be a single form.
1261 lines
45 KiB
Plaintext
1261 lines
45 KiB
Plaintext
@c -*-texinfo-*-
|
|
@c This is part of the GNU Emacs Lisp Reference Manual.
|
|
@c Copyright (C) 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1998, 1999
|
|
@c Free Software Foundation, Inc.
|
|
@c See the file elisp.texi for copying conditions.
|
|
@setfilename ../info/control
|
|
@node Control Structures, Variables, Evaluation, Top
|
|
@chapter Control Structures
|
|
@cindex special forms for control structures
|
|
@cindex control structures
|
|
|
|
A Lisp program consists of expressions or @dfn{forms} (@pxref{Forms}).
|
|
We control the order of execution of these forms by enclosing them in
|
|
@dfn{control structures}. Control structures are special forms which
|
|
control when, whether, or how many times to execute the forms they
|
|
contain.
|
|
|
|
The simplest order of execution is sequential execution: first form
|
|
@var{a}, then form @var{b}, and so on. This is what happens when you
|
|
write several forms in succession in the body of a function, or at top
|
|
level in a file of Lisp code---the forms are executed in the order
|
|
written. We call this @dfn{textual order}. For example, if a function
|
|
body consists of two forms @var{a} and @var{b}, evaluation of the
|
|
function evaluates first @var{a} and then @var{b}. The result of
|
|
evaluating @var{b} becomes the value of the function.
|
|
|
|
Explicit control structures make possible an order of execution other
|
|
than sequential.
|
|
|
|
Emacs Lisp provides several kinds of control structure, including
|
|
other varieties of sequencing, conditionals, iteration, and (controlled)
|
|
jumps---all discussed below. The built-in control structures are
|
|
special forms since their subforms are not necessarily evaluated or not
|
|
evaluated sequentially. You can use macros to define your own control
|
|
structure constructs (@pxref{Macros}).
|
|
|
|
@menu
|
|
* Sequencing:: Evaluation in textual order.
|
|
* Conditionals:: @code{if}, @code{cond}, @code{when}, @code{unless}.
|
|
* Combining Conditions:: @code{and}, @code{or}, @code{not}.
|
|
* Iteration:: @code{while} loops.
|
|
* Nonlocal Exits:: Jumping out of a sequence.
|
|
@end menu
|
|
|
|
@node Sequencing
|
|
@section Sequencing
|
|
|
|
Evaluating forms in the order they appear is the most common way
|
|
control passes from one form to another. In some contexts, such as in a
|
|
function body, this happens automatically. Elsewhere you must use a
|
|
control structure construct to do this: @code{progn}, the simplest
|
|
control construct of Lisp.
|
|
|
|
A @code{progn} special form looks like this:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
@group
|
|
(progn @var{a} @var{b} @var{c} @dots{})
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
|
and it says to execute the forms @var{a}, @var{b}, @var{c}, and so on, in
|
|
that order. These forms are called the @dfn{body} of the @code{progn} form.
|
|
The value of the last form in the body becomes the value of the entire
|
|
@code{progn}. @code{(progn)} returns @code{nil}.
|
|
|
|
@cindex implicit @code{progn}
|
|
In the early days of Lisp, @code{progn} was the only way to execute
|
|
two or more forms in succession and use the value of the last of them.
|
|
But programmers found they often needed to use a @code{progn} in the
|
|
body of a function, where (at that time) only one form was allowed. So
|
|
the body of a function was made into an ``implicit @code{progn}'':
|
|
several forms are allowed just as in the body of an actual @code{progn}.
|
|
Many other control structures likewise contain an implicit @code{progn}.
|
|
As a result, @code{progn} is not used as much as it was many years ago.
|
|
It is needed now most often inside an @code{unwind-protect}, @code{and},
|
|
@code{or}, or in the @var{then}-part of an @code{if}.
|
|
|
|
@defspec progn forms@dots{}
|
|
This special form evaluates all of the @var{forms}, in textual
|
|
order, returning the result of the final form.
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
@group
|
|
(progn (print "The first form")
|
|
(print "The second form")
|
|
(print "The third form"))
|
|
@print{} "The first form"
|
|
@print{} "The second form"
|
|
@print{} "The third form"
|
|
@result{} "The third form"
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end example
|
|
@end defspec
|
|
|
|
Two other control constructs likewise evaluate a series of forms but return
|
|
a different value:
|
|
|
|
@defspec prog1 form1 forms@dots{}
|
|
This special form evaluates @var{form1} and all of the @var{forms}, in
|
|
textual order, returning the result of @var{form1}.
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
@group
|
|
(prog1 (print "The first form")
|
|
(print "The second form")
|
|
(print "The third form"))
|
|
@print{} "The first form"
|
|
@print{} "The second form"
|
|
@print{} "The third form"
|
|
@result{} "The first form"
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
Here is a way to remove the first element from a list in the variable
|
|
@code{x}, then return the value of that former element:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
(prog1 (car x) (setq x (cdr x)))
|
|
@end example
|
|
@end defspec
|
|
|
|
@defspec prog2 form1 form2 forms@dots{}
|
|
This special form evaluates @var{form1}, @var{form2}, and all of the
|
|
following @var{forms}, in textual order, returning the result of
|
|
@var{form2}.
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
@group
|
|
(prog2 (print "The first form")
|
|
(print "The second form")
|
|
(print "The third form"))
|
|
@print{} "The first form"
|
|
@print{} "The second form"
|
|
@print{} "The third form"
|
|
@result{} "The second form"
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end example
|
|
@end defspec
|
|
|
|
@node Conditionals
|
|
@section Conditionals
|
|
@cindex conditional evaluation
|
|
|
|
Conditional control structures choose among alternatives. Emacs Lisp
|
|
has four conditional forms: @code{if}, which is much the same as in
|
|
other languages; @code{when} and @code{unless}, which are variants of
|
|
@code{if}; and @code{cond}, which is a generalized case statement.
|
|
|
|
@defspec if condition then-form else-forms@dots{}
|
|
@code{if} chooses between the @var{then-form} and the @var{else-forms}
|
|
based on the value of @var{condition}. If the evaluated @var{condition} is
|
|
non-@code{nil}, @var{then-form} is evaluated and the result returned.
|
|
Otherwise, the @var{else-forms} are evaluated in textual order, and the
|
|
value of the last one is returned. (The @var{else} part of @code{if} is
|
|
an example of an implicit @code{progn}. @xref{Sequencing}.)
|
|
|
|
If @var{condition} has the value @code{nil}, and no @var{else-forms} are
|
|
given, @code{if} returns @code{nil}.
|
|
|
|
@code{if} is a special form because the branch that is not selected is
|
|
never evaluated---it is ignored. Thus, in the example below,
|
|
@code{true} is not printed because @code{print} is never called.
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
@group
|
|
(if nil
|
|
(print 'true)
|
|
'very-false)
|
|
@result{} very-false
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end example
|
|
@end defspec
|
|
|
|
@defmac when condition then-forms@dots{}
|
|
This is a variant of @code{if} where there are no @var{else-forms},
|
|
and possibly several @var{then-forms}. In particular,
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
(when @var{condition} @var{a} @var{b} @var{c})
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
|
is entirely equivalent to
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
(if @var{condition} (progn @var{a} @var{b} @var{c}) nil)
|
|
@end example
|
|
@end defmac
|
|
|
|
@defmac unless condition forms@dots{}
|
|
This is a variant of @code{if} where there is no @var{then-form}:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
(unless @var{condition} @var{a} @var{b} @var{c})
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
|
is entirely equivalent to
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
(if @var{condition} nil
|
|
@var{a} @var{b} @var{c})
|
|
@end example
|
|
@end defmac
|
|
|
|
@defspec cond clause@dots{}
|
|
@code{cond} chooses among an arbitrary number of alternatives. Each
|
|
@var{clause} in the @code{cond} must be a list. The @sc{car} of this
|
|
list is the @var{condition}; the remaining elements, if any, the
|
|
@var{body-forms}. Thus, a clause looks like this:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
(@var{condition} @var{body-forms}@dots{})
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
@code{cond} tries the clauses in textual order, by evaluating the
|
|
@var{condition} of each clause. If the value of @var{condition} is
|
|
non-@code{nil}, the clause ``succeeds''; then @code{cond} evaluates its
|
|
@var{body-forms}, and the value of the last of @var{body-forms} becomes
|
|
the value of the @code{cond}. The remaining clauses are ignored.
|
|
|
|
If the value of @var{condition} is @code{nil}, the clause ``fails'', so
|
|
the @code{cond} moves on to the following clause, trying its
|
|
@var{condition}.
|
|
|
|
If every @var{condition} evaluates to @code{nil}, so that every clause
|
|
fails, @code{cond} returns @code{nil}.
|
|
|
|
A clause may also look like this:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
(@var{condition})
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
|
Then, if @var{condition} is non-@code{nil} when tested, the value of
|
|
@var{condition} becomes the value of the @code{cond} form.
|
|
|
|
The following example has four clauses, which test for the cases where
|
|
the value of @code{x} is a number, string, buffer and symbol,
|
|
respectively:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
@group
|
|
(cond ((numberp x) x)
|
|
((stringp x) x)
|
|
((bufferp x)
|
|
(setq temporary-hack x) ; @r{multiple body-forms}
|
|
(buffer-name x)) ; @r{in one clause}
|
|
((symbolp x) (symbol-value x)))
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
Often we want to execute the last clause whenever none of the previous
|
|
clauses was successful. To do this, we use @code{t} as the
|
|
@var{condition} of the last clause, like this: @code{(t
|
|
@var{body-forms})}. The form @code{t} evaluates to @code{t}, which is
|
|
never @code{nil}, so this clause never fails, provided the @code{cond}
|
|
gets to it at all.
|
|
|
|
For example,
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
@group
|
|
(setq a 5)
|
|
(cond ((eq a 'hack) 'foo)
|
|
(t "default"))
|
|
@result{} "default"
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
|
This @code{cond} expression returns @code{foo} if the value of @code{a}
|
|
is @code{hack}, and returns the string @code{"default"} otherwise.
|
|
@end defspec
|
|
|
|
Any conditional construct can be expressed with @code{cond} or with
|
|
@code{if}. Therefore, the choice between them is a matter of style.
|
|
For example:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
@group
|
|
(if @var{a} @var{b} @var{c})
|
|
@equiv{}
|
|
(cond (@var{a} @var{b}) (t @var{c}))
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
@node Combining Conditions
|
|
@section Constructs for Combining Conditions
|
|
|
|
This section describes three constructs that are often used together
|
|
with @code{if} and @code{cond} to express complicated conditions. The
|
|
constructs @code{and} and @code{or} can also be used individually as
|
|
kinds of multiple conditional constructs.
|
|
|
|
@defun not condition
|
|
This function tests for the falsehood of @var{condition}. It returns
|
|
@code{t} if @var{condition} is @code{nil}, and @code{nil} otherwise.
|
|
The function @code{not} is identical to @code{null}, and we recommend
|
|
using the name @code{null} if you are testing for an empty list.
|
|
@end defun
|
|
|
|
@defspec and conditions@dots{}
|
|
The @code{and} special form tests whether all the @var{conditions} are
|
|
true. It works by evaluating the @var{conditions} one by one in the
|
|
order written.
|
|
|
|
If any of the @var{conditions} evaluates to @code{nil}, then the result
|
|
of the @code{and} must be @code{nil} regardless of the remaining
|
|
@var{conditions}; so @code{and} returns @code{nil} right away, ignoring
|
|
the remaining @var{conditions}.
|
|
|
|
If all the @var{conditions} turn out non-@code{nil}, then the value of
|
|
the last of them becomes the value of the @code{and} form. Just
|
|
@code{(and)}, with no @var{conditions}, returns @code{t}, appropriate
|
|
because all the @var{conditions} turned out non-@code{nil}. (Think
|
|
about it; which one did not?)
|
|
|
|
Here is an example. The first condition returns the integer 1, which is
|
|
not @code{nil}. Similarly, the second condition returns the integer 2,
|
|
which is not @code{nil}. The third condition is @code{nil}, so the
|
|
remaining condition is never evaluated.
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
@group
|
|
(and (print 1) (print 2) nil (print 3))
|
|
@print{} 1
|
|
@print{} 2
|
|
@result{} nil
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
Here is a more realistic example of using @code{and}:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
@group
|
|
(if (and (consp foo) (eq (car foo) 'x))
|
|
(message "foo is a list starting with x"))
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
|
Note that @code{(car foo)} is not executed if @code{(consp foo)} returns
|
|
@code{nil}, thus avoiding an error.
|
|
|
|
@code{and} can be expressed in terms of either @code{if} or @code{cond}.
|
|
For example:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
@group
|
|
(and @var{arg1} @var{arg2} @var{arg3})
|
|
@equiv{}
|
|
(if @var{arg1} (if @var{arg2} @var{arg3}))
|
|
@equiv{}
|
|
(cond (@var{arg1} (cond (@var{arg2} @var{arg3}))))
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end example
|
|
@end defspec
|
|
|
|
@defspec or conditions@dots{}
|
|
The @code{or} special form tests whether at least one of the
|
|
@var{conditions} is true. It works by evaluating all the
|
|
@var{conditions} one by one in the order written.
|
|
|
|
If any of the @var{conditions} evaluates to a non-@code{nil} value, then
|
|
the result of the @code{or} must be non-@code{nil}; so @code{or} returns
|
|
right away, ignoring the remaining @var{conditions}. The value it
|
|
returns is the non-@code{nil} value of the condition just evaluated.
|
|
|
|
If all the @var{conditions} turn out @code{nil}, then the @code{or}
|
|
expression returns @code{nil}. Just @code{(or)}, with no
|
|
@var{conditions}, returns @code{nil}, appropriate because all the
|
|
@var{conditions} turned out @code{nil}. (Think about it; which one
|
|
did not?)
|
|
|
|
For example, this expression tests whether @code{x} is either
|
|
@code{nil} or the integer zero:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
(or (eq x nil) (eq x 0))
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
Like the @code{and} construct, @code{or} can be written in terms of
|
|
@code{cond}. For example:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
@group
|
|
(or @var{arg1} @var{arg2} @var{arg3})
|
|
@equiv{}
|
|
(cond (@var{arg1})
|
|
(@var{arg2})
|
|
(@var{arg3}))
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
You could almost write @code{or} in terms of @code{if}, but not quite:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
@group
|
|
(if @var{arg1} @var{arg1}
|
|
(if @var{arg2} @var{arg2}
|
|
@var{arg3}))
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
|
This is not completely equivalent because it can evaluate @var{arg1} or
|
|
@var{arg2} twice. By contrast, @code{(or @var{arg1} @var{arg2}
|
|
@var{arg3})} never evaluates any argument more than once.
|
|
@end defspec
|
|
|
|
@node Iteration
|
|
@section Iteration
|
|
@cindex iteration
|
|
@cindex recursion
|
|
|
|
Iteration means executing part of a program repetitively. For
|
|
example, you might want to repeat some computation once for each element
|
|
of a list, or once for each integer from 0 to @var{n}. You can do this
|
|
in Emacs Lisp with the special form @code{while}:
|
|
|
|
@defspec while condition forms@dots{}
|
|
@code{while} first evaluates @var{condition}. If the result is
|
|
non-@code{nil}, it evaluates @var{forms} in textual order. Then it
|
|
reevaluates @var{condition}, and if the result is non-@code{nil}, it
|
|
evaluates @var{forms} again. This process repeats until @var{condition}
|
|
evaluates to @code{nil}.
|
|
|
|
There is no limit on the number of iterations that may occur. The loop
|
|
will continue until either @var{condition} evaluates to @code{nil} or
|
|
until an error or @code{throw} jumps out of it (@pxref{Nonlocal Exits}).
|
|
|
|
The value of a @code{while} form is always @code{nil}.
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
@group
|
|
(setq num 0)
|
|
@result{} 0
|
|
@end group
|
|
@group
|
|
(while (< num 4)
|
|
(princ (format "Iteration %d." num))
|
|
(setq num (1+ num)))
|
|
@print{} Iteration 0.
|
|
@print{} Iteration 1.
|
|
@print{} Iteration 2.
|
|
@print{} Iteration 3.
|
|
@result{} nil
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
To write a ``repeat...until'' loop, which will execute something on each
|
|
iteration and then do the end-test, put the body followed by the
|
|
end-test in a @code{progn} as the first argument of @code{while}, as
|
|
shown here:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
@group
|
|
(while (progn
|
|
(forward-line 1)
|
|
(not (looking-at "^$"))))
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
|
This moves forward one line and continues moving by lines until it
|
|
reaches an empty line. It is peculiar in that the @code{while} has no
|
|
body, just the end test (which also does the real work of moving point).
|
|
@end defspec
|
|
|
|
The @code{dolist} and @code{dotimes} macros provide convenient ways to
|
|
write two common kinds of loops.
|
|
|
|
@defmac dolist (var list [result]) body@dots{}
|
|
@tindex dolist
|
|
This construct executes @var{body} once for each element of @var{list},
|
|
using the variable @var{var} to hold the current element. Then it
|
|
returns the value of evaluating @var{result}, or @code{nil} if
|
|
@var{result} is omitted. For example, here is how you could use
|
|
@code{dolist} to define the @code{reverse} function:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
(defun reverse (list)
|
|
(let (value)
|
|
(dolist (elt list value)
|
|
(setq value (cons elt value)))))
|
|
@end example
|
|
@end defmac
|
|
|
|
@defmac dotimes (var count [result]) body@dots{}
|
|
@tindex dotimes
|
|
This construct executes @var{body} once for each integer from 0
|
|
(inclusive) to @var{count} (exclusive), using the variable @var{var} to
|
|
hold the integer for the current iteration. Then it returns the value
|
|
of evaluating @var{result}, or @code{nil} if @var{result} is omitted.
|
|
Here is an example of using @code{dotimes} to do something 100 times:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
(dotimes (i 100)
|
|
(insert "I will not obey absurd orders\n"))
|
|
@end example
|
|
@end defmac
|
|
|
|
@node Nonlocal Exits
|
|
@section Nonlocal Exits
|
|
@cindex nonlocal exits
|
|
|
|
A @dfn{nonlocal exit} is a transfer of control from one point in a
|
|
program to another remote point. Nonlocal exits can occur in Emacs Lisp
|
|
as a result of errors; you can also use them under explicit control.
|
|
Nonlocal exits unbind all variable bindings made by the constructs being
|
|
exited.
|
|
|
|
@menu
|
|
* Catch and Throw:: Nonlocal exits for the program's own purposes.
|
|
* Examples of Catch:: Showing how such nonlocal exits can be written.
|
|
* Errors:: How errors are signaled and handled.
|
|
* Cleanups:: Arranging to run a cleanup form if an error happens.
|
|
@end menu
|
|
|
|
@node Catch and Throw
|
|
@subsection Explicit Nonlocal Exits: @code{catch} and @code{throw}
|
|
|
|
Most control constructs affect only the flow of control within the
|
|
construct itself. The function @code{throw} is the exception to this
|
|
rule of normal program execution: it performs a nonlocal exit on
|
|
request. (There are other exceptions, but they are for error handling
|
|
only.) @code{throw} is used inside a @code{catch}, and jumps back to
|
|
that @code{catch}. For example:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
@group
|
|
(defun foo-outer ()
|
|
(catch 'foo
|
|
(foo-inner)))
|
|
|
|
(defun foo-inner ()
|
|
@dots{}
|
|
(if x
|
|
(throw 'foo t))
|
|
@dots{})
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
|
The @code{throw} form, if executed, transfers control straight back to
|
|
the corresponding @code{catch}, which returns immediately. The code
|
|
following the @code{throw} is not executed. The second argument of
|
|
@code{throw} is used as the return value of the @code{catch}.
|
|
|
|
The function @code{throw} finds the matching @code{catch} based on the
|
|
first argument: it searches for a @code{catch} whose first argument is
|
|
@code{eq} to the one specified in the @code{throw}. If there is more
|
|
than one applicable @code{catch}, the innermost one takes precedence.
|
|
Thus, in the above example, the @code{throw} specifies @code{foo}, and
|
|
the @code{catch} in @code{foo-outer} specifies the same symbol, so that
|
|
@code{catch} is the applicable one (assuming there is no other matching
|
|
@code{catch} in between).
|
|
|
|
Executing @code{throw} exits all Lisp constructs up to the matching
|
|
@code{catch}, including function calls. When binding constructs such as
|
|
@code{let} or function calls are exited in this way, the bindings are
|
|
unbound, just as they are when these constructs exit normally
|
|
(@pxref{Local Variables}). Likewise, @code{throw} restores the buffer
|
|
and position saved by @code{save-excursion} (@pxref{Excursions}), and
|
|
the narrowing status saved by @code{save-restriction} and the window
|
|
selection saved by @code{save-window-excursion} (@pxref{Window
|
|
Configurations}). It also runs any cleanups established with the
|
|
@code{unwind-protect} special form when it exits that form
|
|
(@pxref{Cleanups}).
|
|
|
|
The @code{throw} need not appear lexically within the @code{catch}
|
|
that it jumps to. It can equally well be called from another function
|
|
called within the @code{catch}. As long as the @code{throw} takes place
|
|
chronologically after entry to the @code{catch}, and chronologically
|
|
before exit from it, it has access to that @code{catch}. This is why
|
|
@code{throw} can be used in commands such as @code{exit-recursive-edit}
|
|
that throw back to the editor command loop (@pxref{Recursive Editing}).
|
|
|
|
@cindex CL note---only @code{throw} in Emacs
|
|
@quotation
|
|
@b{Common Lisp note:} Most other versions of Lisp, including Common Lisp,
|
|
have several ways of transferring control nonsequentially: @code{return},
|
|
@code{return-from}, and @code{go}, for example. Emacs Lisp has only
|
|
@code{throw}.
|
|
@end quotation
|
|
|
|
@defspec catch tag body@dots{}
|
|
@cindex tag on run time stack
|
|
@code{catch} establishes a return point for the @code{throw} function.
|
|
The return point is distinguished from other such return points by
|
|
@var{tag}, which may be any Lisp object except @code{nil}. The argument
|
|
@var{tag} is evaluated normally before the return point is established.
|
|
|
|
With the return point in effect, @code{catch} evaluates the forms of the
|
|
@var{body} in textual order. If the forms execute normally (without
|
|
error or nonlocal exit) the value of the last body form is returned from
|
|
the @code{catch}.
|
|
|
|
If a @code{throw} is executed during the execution of @var{body},
|
|
specifying the same value @var{tag}, the @code{catch} form exits
|
|
immediately; the value it returns is whatever was specified as the
|
|
second argument of @code{throw}.
|
|
@end defspec
|
|
|
|
@defun throw tag value
|
|
The purpose of @code{throw} is to return from a return point previously
|
|
established with @code{catch}. The argument @var{tag} is used to choose
|
|
among the various existing return points; it must be @code{eq} to the value
|
|
specified in the @code{catch}. If multiple return points match @var{tag},
|
|
the innermost one is used.
|
|
|
|
The argument @var{value} is used as the value to return from that
|
|
@code{catch}.
|
|
|
|
@kindex no-catch
|
|
If no return point is in effect with tag @var{tag}, then a @code{no-catch}
|
|
error is signaled with data @code{(@var{tag} @var{value})}.
|
|
@end defun
|
|
|
|
@node Examples of Catch
|
|
@subsection Examples of @code{catch} and @code{throw}
|
|
|
|
One way to use @code{catch} and @code{throw} is to exit from a doubly
|
|
nested loop. (In most languages, this would be done with a ``go to''.)
|
|
Here we compute @code{(foo @var{i} @var{j})} for @var{i} and @var{j}
|
|
varying from 0 to 9:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
@group
|
|
(defun search-foo ()
|
|
(catch 'loop
|
|
(let ((i 0))
|
|
(while (< i 10)
|
|
(let ((j 0))
|
|
(while (< j 10)
|
|
(if (foo i j)
|
|
(throw 'loop (list i j)))
|
|
(setq j (1+ j))))
|
|
(setq i (1+ i))))))
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
|
If @code{foo} ever returns non-@code{nil}, we stop immediately and return a
|
|
list of @var{i} and @var{j}. If @code{foo} always returns @code{nil}, the
|
|
@code{catch} returns normally, and the value is @code{nil}, since that
|
|
is the result of the @code{while}.
|
|
|
|
Here are two tricky examples, slightly different, showing two
|
|
return points at once. First, two return points with the same tag,
|
|
@code{hack}:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
@group
|
|
(defun catch2 (tag)
|
|
(catch tag
|
|
(throw 'hack 'yes)))
|
|
@result{} catch2
|
|
@end group
|
|
|
|
@group
|
|
(catch 'hack
|
|
(print (catch2 'hack))
|
|
'no)
|
|
@print{} yes
|
|
@result{} no
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
|
Since both return points have tags that match the @code{throw}, it goes to
|
|
the inner one, the one established in @code{catch2}. Therefore,
|
|
@code{catch2} returns normally with value @code{yes}, and this value is
|
|
printed. Finally the second body form in the outer @code{catch}, which is
|
|
@code{'no}, is evaluated and returned from the outer @code{catch}.
|
|
|
|
Now let's change the argument given to @code{catch2}:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
@group
|
|
(catch 'hack
|
|
(print (catch2 'quux))
|
|
'no)
|
|
@result{} yes
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
|
We still have two return points, but this time only the outer one has
|
|
the tag @code{hack}; the inner one has the tag @code{quux} instead.
|
|
Therefore, @code{throw} makes the outer @code{catch} return the value
|
|
@code{yes}. The function @code{print} is never called, and the
|
|
body-form @code{'no} is never evaluated.
|
|
|
|
@node Errors
|
|
@subsection Errors
|
|
@cindex errors
|
|
|
|
When Emacs Lisp attempts to evaluate a form that, for some reason,
|
|
cannot be evaluated, it @dfn{signals} an @dfn{error}.
|
|
|
|
When an error is signaled, Emacs's default reaction is to print an
|
|
error message and terminate execution of the current command. This is
|
|
the right thing to do in most cases, such as if you type @kbd{C-f} at
|
|
the end of the buffer.
|
|
|
|
In complicated programs, simple termination may not be what you want.
|
|
For example, the program may have made temporary changes in data
|
|
structures, or created temporary buffers that should be deleted before
|
|
the program is finished. In such cases, you would use
|
|
@code{unwind-protect} to establish @dfn{cleanup expressions} to be
|
|
evaluated in case of error. (@xref{Cleanups}.) Occasionally, you may
|
|
wish the program to continue execution despite an error in a subroutine.
|
|
In these cases, you would use @code{condition-case} to establish
|
|
@dfn{error handlers} to recover control in case of error.
|
|
|
|
Resist the temptation to use error handling to transfer control from
|
|
one part of the program to another; use @code{catch} and @code{throw}
|
|
instead. @xref{Catch and Throw}.
|
|
|
|
@menu
|
|
* Signaling Errors:: How to report an error.
|
|
* Processing of Errors:: What Emacs does when you report an error.
|
|
* Handling Errors:: How you can trap errors and continue execution.
|
|
* Error Symbols:: How errors are classified for trapping them.
|
|
@end menu
|
|
|
|
@node Signaling Errors
|
|
@subsubsection How to Signal an Error
|
|
@cindex signaling errors
|
|
|
|
@dfn{Signalling} an error means beginning error processing. Error
|
|
processing normally aborts all or part of the running program and
|
|
returns to a point that is set up to handle the error
|
|
(@pxref{Processing of Errors}). Here we describe how to signal an
|
|
error.
|
|
|
|
Most errors are signaled ``automatically'' within Lisp primitives
|
|
which you call for other purposes, such as if you try to take the
|
|
@sc{car} of an integer or move forward a character at the end of the
|
|
buffer. You can also signal errors explicitly with the functions
|
|
@code{error} and @code{signal}.
|
|
|
|
Quitting, which happens when the user types @kbd{C-g}, is not
|
|
considered an error, but it is handled almost like an error.
|
|
@xref{Quitting}.
|
|
|
|
Every error specifies an error message, one way or another. The
|
|
message should state what is wrong (``File does not exist''), not how
|
|
things ought to be (``File must exist''). The convention in Emacs
|
|
Lisp is that error messages should start with a capital letter, but
|
|
should not end with any sort of punctuation.
|
|
|
|
@defun error format-string &rest args
|
|
This function signals an error with an error message constructed by
|
|
applying @code{format} (@pxref{Formatting Strings}) to
|
|
@var{format-string} and @var{args}.
|
|
|
|
These examples show typical uses of @code{error}:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
@group
|
|
(error "That is an error -- try something else")
|
|
@error{} That is an error -- try something else
|
|
@end group
|
|
|
|
@group
|
|
(error "You have committed %d errors" 10)
|
|
@error{} You have committed 10 errors
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
@code{error} works by calling @code{signal} with two arguments: the
|
|
error symbol @code{error}, and a list containing the string returned by
|
|
@code{format}.
|
|
|
|
@strong{Warning:} If you want to use your own string as an error message
|
|
verbatim, don't just write @code{(error @var{string})}. If @var{string}
|
|
contains @samp{%}, it will be interpreted as a format specifier, with
|
|
undesirable results. Instead, use @code{(error "%s" @var{string})}.
|
|
@end defun
|
|
|
|
@anchor{Definition of signal}
|
|
@defun signal error-symbol data
|
|
This function signals an error named by @var{error-symbol}. The
|
|
argument @var{data} is a list of additional Lisp objects relevant to the
|
|
circumstances of the error.
|
|
|
|
The argument @var{error-symbol} must be an @dfn{error symbol}---a symbol
|
|
bearing a property @code{error-conditions} whose value is a list of
|
|
condition names. This is how Emacs Lisp classifies different sorts of
|
|
errors. @xref{Error Symbols}, for a description of error symbols,
|
|
error conditions and condition names.
|
|
|
|
If the error is not handled, the two arguments are used in printing
|
|
the error message. Normally, this error message is provided by the
|
|
@code{error-message} property of @var{error-symbol}. If @var{data} is
|
|
non-@code{nil}, this is followed by a colon and a comma separated list
|
|
of the unevaluated elements of @var{data}. For @code{error}, the
|
|
error message is the @sc{car} of @var{data} (that must be a string).
|
|
Subcategories of @code{file-error} are handled specially.
|
|
|
|
The number and significance of the objects in @var{data} depends on
|
|
@var{error-symbol}. For example, with a @code{wrong-type-arg} error,
|
|
there should be two objects in the list: a predicate that describes the type
|
|
that was expected, and the object that failed to fit that type.
|
|
|
|
Both @var{error-symbol} and @var{data} are available to any error
|
|
handlers that handle the error: @code{condition-case} binds a local
|
|
variable to a list of the form @code{(@var{error-symbol} .@:
|
|
@var{data})} (@pxref{Handling Errors}).
|
|
|
|
The function @code{signal} never returns (though in older Emacs versions
|
|
it could sometimes return).
|
|
|
|
@smallexample
|
|
@group
|
|
(signal 'wrong-number-of-arguments '(x y))
|
|
@error{} Wrong number of arguments: x, y
|
|
@end group
|
|
|
|
@group
|
|
(signal 'no-such-error '("My unknown error condition"))
|
|
@error{} peculiar error: "My unknown error condition"
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end smallexample
|
|
@end defun
|
|
|
|
@cindex CL note---no continuable errors
|
|
@quotation
|
|
@b{Common Lisp note:} Emacs Lisp has nothing like the Common Lisp
|
|
concept of continuable errors.
|
|
@end quotation
|
|
|
|
@node Processing of Errors
|
|
@subsubsection How Emacs Processes Errors
|
|
|
|
When an error is signaled, @code{signal} searches for an active
|
|
@dfn{handler} for the error. A handler is a sequence of Lisp
|
|
expressions designated to be executed if an error happens in part of the
|
|
Lisp program. If the error has an applicable handler, the handler is
|
|
executed, and control resumes following the handler. The handler
|
|
executes in the environment of the @code{condition-case} that
|
|
established it; all functions called within that @code{condition-case}
|
|
have already been exited, and the handler cannot return to them.
|
|
|
|
If there is no applicable handler for the error, the current command is
|
|
terminated and control returns to the editor command loop, because the
|
|
command loop has an implicit handler for all kinds of errors. The
|
|
command loop's handler uses the error symbol and associated data to
|
|
print an error message.
|
|
|
|
@cindex @code{debug-on-error} use
|
|
An error that has no explicit handler may call the Lisp debugger. The
|
|
debugger is enabled if the variable @code{debug-on-error} (@pxref{Error
|
|
Debugging}) is non-@code{nil}. Unlike error handlers, the debugger runs
|
|
in the environment of the error, so that you can examine values of
|
|
variables precisely as they were at the time of the error.
|
|
|
|
@node Handling Errors
|
|
@subsubsection Writing Code to Handle Errors
|
|
@cindex error handler
|
|
@cindex handling errors
|
|
|
|
The usual effect of signaling an error is to terminate the command
|
|
that is running and return immediately to the Emacs editor command loop.
|
|
You can arrange to trap errors occurring in a part of your program by
|
|
establishing an error handler, with the special form
|
|
@code{condition-case}. A simple example looks like this:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
@group
|
|
(condition-case nil
|
|
(delete-file filename)
|
|
(error nil))
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
|
This deletes the file named @var{filename}, catching any error and
|
|
returning @code{nil} if an error occurs.
|
|
|
|
The second argument of @code{condition-case} is called the
|
|
@dfn{protected form}. (In the example above, the protected form is a
|
|
call to @code{delete-file}.) The error handlers go into effect when
|
|
this form begins execution and are deactivated when this form returns.
|
|
They remain in effect for all the intervening time. In particular, they
|
|
are in effect during the execution of functions called by this form, in
|
|
their subroutines, and so on. This is a good thing, since, strictly
|
|
speaking, errors can be signaled only by Lisp primitives (including
|
|
@code{signal} and @code{error}) called by the protected form, not by the
|
|
protected form itself.
|
|
|
|
The arguments after the protected form are handlers. Each handler
|
|
lists one or more @dfn{condition names} (which are symbols) to specify
|
|
which errors it will handle. The error symbol specified when an error
|
|
is signaled also defines a list of condition names. A handler applies
|
|
to an error if they have any condition names in common. In the example
|
|
above, there is one handler, and it specifies one condition name,
|
|
@code{error}, which covers all errors.
|
|
|
|
The search for an applicable handler checks all the established handlers
|
|
starting with the most recently established one. Thus, if two nested
|
|
@code{condition-case} forms offer to handle the same error, the inner of
|
|
the two gets to handle it.
|
|
|
|
If an error is handled by some @code{condition-case} form, this
|
|
ordinarily prevents the debugger from being run, even if
|
|
@code{debug-on-error} says this error should invoke the debugger.
|
|
@xref{Error Debugging}. If you want to be able to debug errors that are
|
|
caught by a @code{condition-case}, set the variable
|
|
@code{debug-on-signal} to a non-@code{nil} value.
|
|
|
|
When an error is handled, control returns to the handler. Before this
|
|
happens, Emacs unbinds all variable bindings made by binding constructs
|
|
that are being exited and executes the cleanups of all
|
|
@code{unwind-protect} forms that are exited. Once control arrives at
|
|
the handler, the body of the handler is executed.
|
|
|
|
After execution of the handler body, execution returns from the
|
|
@code{condition-case} form. Because the protected form is exited
|
|
completely before execution of the handler, the handler cannot resume
|
|
execution at the point of the error, nor can it examine variable
|
|
bindings that were made within the protected form. All it can do is
|
|
clean up and proceed.
|
|
|
|
The @code{condition-case} construct is often used to trap errors that
|
|
are predictable, such as failure to open a file in a call to
|
|
@code{insert-file-contents}. It is also used to trap errors that are
|
|
totally unpredictable, such as when the program evaluates an expression
|
|
read from the user.
|
|
|
|
Error signaling and handling have some resemblance to @code{throw} and
|
|
@code{catch} (@pxref{Catch and Throw}), but they are entirely separate
|
|
facilities. An error cannot be caught by a @code{catch}, and a
|
|
@code{throw} cannot be handled by an error handler (though using
|
|
@code{throw} when there is no suitable @code{catch} signals an error
|
|
that can be handled).
|
|
|
|
@defspec condition-case var protected-form handlers@dots{}
|
|
This special form establishes the error handlers @var{handlers} around
|
|
the execution of @var{protected-form}. If @var{protected-form} executes
|
|
without error, the value it returns becomes the value of the
|
|
@code{condition-case} form; in this case, the @code{condition-case} has
|
|
no effect. The @code{condition-case} form makes a difference when an
|
|
error occurs during @var{protected-form}.
|
|
|
|
Each of the @var{handlers} is a list of the form @code{(@var{conditions}
|
|
@var{body}@dots{})}. Here @var{conditions} is an error condition name
|
|
to be handled, or a list of condition names; @var{body} is one or more
|
|
Lisp expressions to be executed when this handler handles an error.
|
|
Here are examples of handlers:
|
|
|
|
@smallexample
|
|
@group
|
|
(error nil)
|
|
|
|
(arith-error (message "Division by zero"))
|
|
|
|
((arith-error file-error)
|
|
(message
|
|
"Either division by zero or failure to open a file"))
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end smallexample
|
|
|
|
Each error that occurs has an @dfn{error symbol} that describes what
|
|
kind of error it is. The @code{error-conditions} property of this
|
|
symbol is a list of condition names (@pxref{Error Symbols}). Emacs
|
|
searches all the active @code{condition-case} forms for a handler that
|
|
specifies one or more of these condition names; the innermost matching
|
|
@code{condition-case} handles the error. Within this
|
|
@code{condition-case}, the first applicable handler handles the error.
|
|
|
|
After executing the body of the handler, the @code{condition-case}
|
|
returns normally, using the value of the last form in the handler body
|
|
as the overall value.
|
|
|
|
@cindex error description
|
|
The argument @var{var} is a variable. @code{condition-case} does not
|
|
bind this variable when executing the @var{protected-form}, only when it
|
|
handles an error. At that time, it binds @var{var} locally to an
|
|
@dfn{error description}, which is a list giving the particulars of the
|
|
error. The error description has the form @code{(@var{error-symbol}
|
|
. @var{data})}. The handler can refer to this list to decide what to
|
|
do. For example, if the error is for failure opening a file, the file
|
|
name is the second element of @var{data}---the third element of the
|
|
error description.
|
|
|
|
If @var{var} is @code{nil}, that means no variable is bound. Then the
|
|
error symbol and associated data are not available to the handler.
|
|
@end defspec
|
|
|
|
@defun error-message-string error-description
|
|
This function returns the error message string for a given error
|
|
descriptor. It is useful if you want to handle an error by printing the
|
|
usual error message for that error. @xref{Definition of signal}.
|
|
@end defun
|
|
|
|
@cindex @code{arith-error} example
|
|
Here is an example of using @code{condition-case} to handle the error
|
|
that results from dividing by zero. The handler displays the error
|
|
message (but without a beep), then returns a very large number.
|
|
|
|
@smallexample
|
|
@group
|
|
(defun safe-divide (dividend divisor)
|
|
(condition-case err
|
|
;; @r{Protected form.}
|
|
(/ dividend divisor)
|
|
@end group
|
|
@group
|
|
;; @r{The handler.}
|
|
(arith-error ; @r{Condition.}
|
|
;; @r{Display the usual message for this error.}
|
|
(message "%s" (error-message-string err))
|
|
1000000)))
|
|
@result{} safe-divide
|
|
@end group
|
|
|
|
@group
|
|
(safe-divide 5 0)
|
|
@print{} Arithmetic error: (arith-error)
|
|
@result{} 1000000
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end smallexample
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
|
The handler specifies condition name @code{arith-error} so that it will handle only division-by-zero errors. Other kinds of errors will not be handled, at least not by this @code{condition-case}. Thus,
|
|
|
|
@smallexample
|
|
@group
|
|
(safe-divide nil 3)
|
|
@error{} Wrong type argument: number-or-marker-p, nil
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end smallexample
|
|
|
|
Here is a @code{condition-case} that catches all kinds of errors,
|
|
including those signaled with @code{error}:
|
|
|
|
@smallexample
|
|
@group
|
|
(setq baz 34)
|
|
@result{} 34
|
|
@end group
|
|
|
|
@group
|
|
(condition-case err
|
|
(if (eq baz 35)
|
|
t
|
|
;; @r{This is a call to the function @code{error}.}
|
|
(error "Rats! The variable %s was %s, not 35" 'baz baz))
|
|
;; @r{This is the handler; it is not a form.}
|
|
(error (princ (format "The error was: %s" err))
|
|
2))
|
|
@print{} The error was: (error "Rats! The variable baz was 34, not 35")
|
|
@result{} 2
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end smallexample
|
|
|
|
@node Error Symbols
|
|
@subsubsection Error Symbols and Condition Names
|
|
@cindex error symbol
|
|
@cindex error name
|
|
@cindex condition name
|
|
@cindex user-defined error
|
|
@kindex error-conditions
|
|
|
|
When you signal an error, you specify an @dfn{error symbol} to specify
|
|
the kind of error you have in mind. Each error has one and only one
|
|
error symbol to categorize it. This is the finest classification of
|
|
errors defined by the Emacs Lisp language.
|
|
|
|
These narrow classifications are grouped into a hierarchy of wider
|
|
classes called @dfn{error conditions}, identified by @dfn{condition
|
|
names}. The narrowest such classes belong to the error symbols
|
|
themselves: each error symbol is also a condition name. There are also
|
|
condition names for more extensive classes, up to the condition name
|
|
@code{error} which takes in all kinds of errors (but not @code{quit}).
|
|
Thus, each error has one or more condition names: @code{error}, the
|
|
error symbol if that is distinct from @code{error}, and perhaps some
|
|
intermediate classifications.
|
|
|
|
In order for a symbol to be an error symbol, it must have an
|
|
@code{error-conditions} property which gives a list of condition names.
|
|
This list defines the conditions that this kind of error belongs to.
|
|
(The error symbol itself, and the symbol @code{error}, should always be
|
|
members of this list.) Thus, the hierarchy of condition names is
|
|
defined by the @code{error-conditions} properties of the error symbols.
|
|
Because quitting is not considered an error, the value of the
|
|
@code{error-conditions} property of @code{quit} is just @code{(quit)}.
|
|
|
|
@cindex peculiar error
|
|
In addition to the @code{error-conditions} list, the error symbol
|
|
should have an @code{error-message} property whose value is a string to
|
|
be printed when that error is signaled but not handled. If the
|
|
error symbol has no @code{error-message} property or if the
|
|
@code{error-message} property exists, but is not a string, the error
|
|
message @samp{peculiar error} is used. @xref{Definition of signal}.
|
|
|
|
Here is how we define a new error symbol, @code{new-error}:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
@group
|
|
(put 'new-error
|
|
'error-conditions
|
|
'(error my-own-errors new-error))
|
|
@result{} (error my-own-errors new-error)
|
|
@end group
|
|
@group
|
|
(put 'new-error 'error-message "A new error")
|
|
@result{} "A new error"
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
|
This error has three condition names: @code{new-error}, the narrowest
|
|
classification; @code{my-own-errors}, which we imagine is a wider
|
|
classification; and @code{error}, which is the widest of all.
|
|
|
|
The error string should start with a capital letter but it should
|
|
not end with a period. This is for consistency with the rest of Emacs.
|
|
|
|
Naturally, Emacs will never signal @code{new-error} on its own; only
|
|
an explicit call to @code{signal} (@pxref{Definition of signal}) in
|
|
your code can do this:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
@group
|
|
(signal 'new-error '(x y))
|
|
@error{} A new error: x, y
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
This error can be handled through any of the three condition names.
|
|
This example handles @code{new-error} and any other errors in the class
|
|
@code{my-own-errors}:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
@group
|
|
(condition-case foo
|
|
(bar nil t)
|
|
(my-own-errors nil))
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
The significant way that errors are classified is by their condition
|
|
names---the names used to match errors with handlers. An error symbol
|
|
serves only as a convenient way to specify the intended error message
|
|
and list of condition names. It would be cumbersome to give
|
|
@code{signal} a list of condition names rather than one error symbol.
|
|
|
|
By contrast, using only error symbols without condition names would
|
|
seriously decrease the power of @code{condition-case}. Condition names
|
|
make it possible to categorize errors at various levels of generality
|
|
when you write an error handler. Using error symbols alone would
|
|
eliminate all but the narrowest level of classification.
|
|
|
|
@xref{Standard Errors}, for a list of all the standard error symbols
|
|
and their conditions.
|
|
|
|
@node Cleanups
|
|
@subsection Cleaning Up from Nonlocal Exits
|
|
|
|
The @code{unwind-protect} construct is essential whenever you
|
|
temporarily put a data structure in an inconsistent state; it permits
|
|
you to make the data consistent again in the event of an error or throw.
|
|
|
|
@defspec unwind-protect body-form cleanup-forms@dots{}
|
|
@cindex cleanup forms
|
|
@cindex protected forms
|
|
@cindex error cleanup
|
|
@cindex unwinding
|
|
@code{unwind-protect} executes @var{body-form} with a guarantee that
|
|
the @var{cleanup-forms} will be evaluated if control leaves
|
|
@var{body-form}, no matter how that happens. @var{body-form} may
|
|
complete normally, or execute a @code{throw} out of the
|
|
@code{unwind-protect}, or cause an error; in all cases, the
|
|
@var{cleanup-forms} will be evaluated.
|
|
|
|
If @var{body-form} finishes normally, @code{unwind-protect} returns the
|
|
value of @var{body-form}, after it evaluates the @var{cleanup-forms}.
|
|
If @var{body-form} does not finish, @code{unwind-protect} does not
|
|
return any value in the normal sense.
|
|
|
|
Only @var{body-form} is protected by the @code{unwind-protect}. If any
|
|
of the @var{cleanup-forms} themselves exits nonlocally (via a
|
|
@code{throw} or an error), @code{unwind-protect} is @emph{not}
|
|
guaranteed to evaluate the rest of them. If the failure of one of the
|
|
@var{cleanup-forms} has the potential to cause trouble, then protect
|
|
it with another @code{unwind-protect} around that form.
|
|
|
|
The number of currently active @code{unwind-protect} forms counts,
|
|
together with the number of local variable bindings, against the limit
|
|
@code{max-specpdl-size} (@pxref{Definition of max-specpdl-size,, Local
|
|
Variables}).
|
|
@end defspec
|
|
|
|
For example, here we make an invisible buffer for temporary use, and
|
|
make sure to kill it before finishing:
|
|
|
|
@smallexample
|
|
@group
|
|
(save-excursion
|
|
(let ((buffer (get-buffer-create " *temp*")))
|
|
(set-buffer buffer)
|
|
(unwind-protect
|
|
@var{body-form}
|
|
(kill-buffer buffer))))
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end smallexample
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
|
You might think that we could just as well write @code{(kill-buffer
|
|
(current-buffer))} and dispense with the variable @code{buffer}.
|
|
However, the way shown above is safer, if @var{body-form} happens to
|
|
get an error after switching to a different buffer! (Alternatively,
|
|
you could write another @code{save-excursion} around @var{body-form},
|
|
to ensure that the temporary buffer becomes current again in time to
|
|
kill it.)
|
|
|
|
Emacs includes a standard macro called @code{with-temp-buffer} which
|
|
expands into more or less the code shown above (@pxref{Definition of
|
|
with-temp-buffer,, Current Buffer}). Several of the macros defined in
|
|
this manual use @code{unwind-protect} in this way.
|
|
|
|
@findex ftp-login
|
|
Here is an actual example derived from an FTP package. It creates a
|
|
process (@pxref{Processes}) to try to establish a connection to a remote
|
|
machine. As the function @code{ftp-login} is highly susceptible to
|
|
numerous problems that the writer of the function cannot anticipate, it
|
|
is protected with a form that guarantees deletion of the process in the
|
|
event of failure. Otherwise, Emacs might fill up with useless
|
|
subprocesses.
|
|
|
|
@smallexample
|
|
@group
|
|
(let ((win nil))
|
|
(unwind-protect
|
|
(progn
|
|
(setq process (ftp-setup-buffer host file))
|
|
(if (setq win (ftp-login process host user password))
|
|
(message "Logged in")
|
|
(error "Ftp login failed")))
|
|
(or win (and process (delete-process process)))))
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end smallexample
|
|
|
|
This example has a small bug: if the user types @kbd{C-g} to
|
|
quit, and the quit happens immediately after the function
|
|
@code{ftp-setup-buffer} returns but before the variable @code{process} is
|
|
set, the process will not be killed. There is no easy way to fix this bug,
|
|
but at least it is very unlikely.
|
|
|
|
@ignore
|
|
arch-tag: 8abc30d4-4d3a-47f9-b908-e9e971c18c6d
|
|
@end ignore
|