1
0
mirror of https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/emacs.git synced 2024-11-29 07:58:28 +00:00
emacs/admin/notes/documentation
2008-10-21 08:40:40 +00:00

77 lines
2.9 KiB
Plaintext

-*- outline -*-
Some documentation tips culled from emacs-devel postings.
** Manual indices
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-10/msg00400.html
For example, this text:
@vindex x-gtk-show-hidden-files
@vindex x-gtk-file-dialog-help-text
When Emacs is compiled with GTK+ support, it uses the GTK+ ``file
chooser'' dialog. Emacs adds an additional toggle button to this
dialog, which you can use to enable or disable the display of hidden
files (files starting with a dot) in that dialog. If you want this
toggle to be activated by default, change the variable
@code{x-gtk-show-hidden-files} to @code{t}. In addition, Emacs adds
help text to the GTK+ file chooser dialog; to disable this help text,
change the variable @code{x-gtk-file-dialog-help-text} to @code{nil}.
has index entries for the variables it describes, which is good, but
what if a user looks for this information without knowing the names of
these variables? For those, I added these two concept index entries:
@cindex hidden files, in GTK+ file chooser
@cindex help text, in GTK+ file chooser
Thus, if a user types "i hidden files TAB" in Info, she will see the
first entry, and so if she types "i file chooser RET". See why it is
better?
The way to come up with useful index entries is to put yourself in the
shoes of someone who looks for the information, and think about words
and phrases you'd use to find it.
One other rule for good indexing is not to have several index entries
that begin with the same substring and point to the same page or
screenful (i.e. to places that are close to one another). Here's a
fictitious example of such redundant entries:
@cindex foobar, how to use
@cindex foobar rules
Either leave only one of these, e.g. just "@cindex foobar", or
combine them into a single entry, e.g.:
@cindex foobar, rules and usage
** Point is a proper name
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-10/msg00414.html
In Emacs tradition, we treat "point" as a proper name when it refers
to the current editing location. It should not have an article.
Thus, it is incorrect to write, "The point does not move". It should
be, "Point does not move".
If you see "the point" anywhere in Emacs documentation or comments,
referring to point, please fix it.
** Don't use passive verbs
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-10/msg00414.html
Documentation is clearer if it avoids the passive voice whenever
possible. For example, rather than saying "Point does not move", say
"This does not move point". If you come across passive verbs in Emacs
documentation or comments, please see if it is possible to make the
text shorter and clearer using the active voice. Usually that does
make an improvement. The explicit subject required by the active voice
often provides important information which makes the text clearer, too.