From 17432f735678c9666fe76d5a65e0262393f85ff4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthew Seaman Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 15:31:25 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Mark as broken on i386 -- compilation fails due to the lack of the 'pg_atomic_uint64' type. That's only deined in the upstream postgresql code on x86_64. --- databases/pg_citus/Makefile | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/databases/pg_citus/Makefile b/databases/pg_citus/Makefile index 13d7b631b8cd..c9e7607356e3 100644 --- a/databases/pg_citus/Makefile +++ b/databases/pg_citus/Makefile @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ PORTNAME= citus PORTVERSION= 8.0.0 +PORTREVISION= 1 DISTVERSIONPREFIX= v CATEGORIES= databases PKGNAMEPREFIX= pg_ @@ -15,6 +16,7 @@ LICENSE= AGPLv3 BROKEN_aarch64= fails to compile: transaction/backend_data.c:53:2: error: unknown type name 'pg_atomic_uint64'; did you mean 'pg_atomic_uint32'? BROKEN_armv6= fails to compile: transaction/backend_data.c:53:2: error: unknown type name 'pg_atomic_uint64'; did you mean 'pg_atomic_uint32'? BROKEN_armv7= fails to compile: transaction/backend_data.c:53:2: error: unknown type name 'pg_atomic_uint64'; did you mean 'pg_atomic_uint32'? +BROKEN_i386= fails to compile: transaction/backend_data.c:727:2: error: unknown type name 'pg_atomic_uint64'; did you mean 'pg_atomic_uint32'? USES= gmake pgsql:9.6+ autoreconf readline WANT_PGSQL= lib server