From fa72655e3b4316bfa16452eb0533f5e1dfa63413 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bryan Drewery Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 16:40:33 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] - When showing vulnerability warning give an explanation that there will not necessarily be an update. Give advice on how to skip the check. It is the user's choice afterall. With hat: portmgr Reported by: jhb --- Mk/bsd.port.mk | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/Mk/bsd.port.mk b/Mk/bsd.port.mk index 30eb3ff1f56f..8ad0638b6e80 100644 --- a/Mk/bsd.port.mk +++ b/Mk/bsd.port.mk @@ -3325,6 +3325,8 @@ check-vulnerable: ${ECHO_MSG} "===> ${PKGNAME} has known vulnerabilities:"; \ ${ECHO_MSG} "$$vlist"; \ ${ECHO_MSG} "=> Please update your ports tree and try again."; \ + ${ECHO_MSG} "=> Ports are marked vulnerable regardless of their being an update available."; \ + ${ECHO_MSG} "=> If you wish to ignore this vulnerability rebuild with 'make DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes'"; \ exit 1; \ fi; \ fi