From 7e40918452b94a522b619c2a980bb281b2649857 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Baldwin Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 00:02:06 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Simplify some logic by merging an if test with a subsequent switch. Specifically, in aio_queue_file() the code was doing this: if (opcode == LIO_SYNC) { ... } switch (opcode) { ... case LIO_SYNC: ... } This moves the body of the if statement into the LIO_SYNC case of the switch statement. MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Chelsio Communications --- sys/kern/vfs_aio.c | 17 +++++++---------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/sys/kern/vfs_aio.c b/sys/kern/vfs_aio.c index c4bed4ce9541..569cf96985ba 100644 --- a/sys/kern/vfs_aio.c +++ b/sys/kern/vfs_aio.c @@ -1736,7 +1736,13 @@ aio_queue_file(struct file *fp, struct kaiocb *job) return (EOPNOTSUPP); } - if (opcode == LIO_SYNC) { + switch (job->uaiocb.aio_lio_opcode) { + case LIO_READ: + case LIO_WRITE: + aio_schedule(job, aio_process_rw); + error = 0; + break; + case LIO_SYNC: AIO_LOCK(ki); TAILQ_FOREACH(job2, &ki->kaio_jobqueue, plist) { if (job2->fd_file == job->fd_file && @@ -1758,15 +1764,6 @@ aio_queue_file(struct file *fp, struct kaiocb *job) return (0); } AIO_UNLOCK(ki); - } - - switch (opcode) { - case LIO_READ: - case LIO_WRITE: - aio_schedule(job, aio_process_rw); - error = 0; - break; - case LIO_SYNC: aio_schedule(job, aio_process_sync); error = 0; break;