diff --git a/posts/2026/10/15/qcncm865-mt7927-comparison/index.org b/posts/2026/10/15/qcncm865-mt7927-comparison/index.org
index 621020c..5c3a0d1 100644
--- a/posts/2026/10/15/qcncm865-mt7927-comparison/index.org
+++ b/posts/2026/10/15/qcncm865-mt7927-comparison/index.org
@@ -25,10 +25,20 @@ This article is at AI level: None. [[https://fizz.buzz/post_ai_levels][Click her
 
 * Comparison
 
+** Frequency
+
+First, the elephant in the room. My laptop connected over 5GHz wifi in every test except for one: the MT7927 going through a wall with powersaving off. In that test, my laptop connected over 6GHz. I did nothing to influence which band the laptop used, so I think it is fair to let the MT7927 reap the rewards of connecting over 6GHz. For this reason, in many of the graphs below, the MT7927 going through a wall with powersaving off appears as an outlier.
+
+[[./files/graphs/signal_strength_freq.svg]]
+
 ** Speed
 
 For this test, I ran an =iperf3= server on my router to measure the speed between my laptop and my router. The traffic did not go out to the public internet, so it is not impacted by my home ISP. I ran 4 tests.
 
+In all 4 tests, the MT7927 going through a wall with powersaving off is the clear winner, but that is likely a direct result of using the 6GHz band.
+
+In the remaining tests, the MT7927 scores a faster transfer rate than the QCNCM865, but not by a significant amount.
+
 *** Upload from laptop to router over tcp
 [[./files/graphs/tcp_upload.svg]]
 *** Download from router to laptop over tcp
@@ -66,14 +76,10 @@ For this test, I kept the wifi card active for 10 minutes by continuously sendin
 
 ** Signal Strength
 
-For the signal strength test, I ran src_bash[:exports code]{iw dev wlan0 link} every second for 10 minutes and parsed out the reported signal strength. This shows that the QCNCM865 reports a better signal strength than the MT7927, however the comparison is not completely apples-to-apples. The MT7927 when powersaving was disabled connected 6ghz which would weaken faster than 5ghz.
+For the signal strength test, I ran src_bash[:exports code]{iw dev wlan0 link} every second for 10 minutes and parsed out the reported signal strength. This shows that the QCNCM865 reports a better signal strength than the MT7927. The MT7927 going through a wall with powersaving off is the outlier of weakest reported signal strength, but that is likely a consequence of using the 6GHz band, which would attenuate faster than 5GHz.
 
 [[./files/graphs/signal_strength.svg]]
 
-The frequency connected during the test:
-
-[[./files/graphs/signal_strength_freq.svg]]
-
 ** Interface Information
 
 # TODO: Is there anything interesting to report here?