From f4986c4856c11917c1fa6fb5d530105ebb530a5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Alexander Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 22:37:37 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Add a conclusion. --- posts/2026/10/15/qcncm865-mt7927-comparison/index.org | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/posts/2026/10/15/qcncm865-mt7927-comparison/index.org b/posts/2026/10/15/qcncm865-mt7927-comparison/index.org index 5bda6c9..1845311 100644 --- a/posts/2026/10/15/qcncm865-mt7927-comparison/index.org +++ b/posts/2026/10/15/qcncm865-mt7927-comparison/index.org @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ This article is at AI level: None. [[https://fizz.buzz/post_ai_levels][Click her * Conclusion -# TODO: Write comparison. +The MT7929 is the clear winner in terms of raw performance (speed / latency) whereas the QCNCM865 used less power. Personally, I am going to stick with the MT7927 because I find the random latency spikes in the QCNCM865 concerning. * Comparison