mirror of
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/emacs.git
synced 2024-11-25 07:28:20 +00:00
61b2f5f96b
A function or macro body consisting of a single string literal now only uses it as a return value. Previously, it had the dual uses as return value and doc string, which was never what the programmer wanted and had some inconvenient consequences (bug#69387). This change applies to `lambda`, `defun`, `defsubst` and `defmacro` forms; most other defining forms already worked in the sensible way. * lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el (byte-compile-lambda): Don't use a lone string literal as doc string. * test/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp-resources/warn-wide-docstring-defun.el (foo): Update docstring warning test. * doc/lispref/functions.texi (Function Documentation): Update. * etc/NEWS: Announce.
2948 lines
114 KiB
Plaintext
2948 lines
114 KiB
Plaintext
@c -*- mode: texinfo; coding: utf-8 -*-
|
||
@c This is part of the GNU Emacs Lisp Reference Manual.
|
||
@c Copyright (C) 1990--1995, 1998--1999, 2001--2024 Free Software
|
||
@c Foundation, Inc.
|
||
@c See the file elisp.texi for copying conditions.
|
||
@node Functions
|
||
@chapter Functions
|
||
|
||
A Lisp program is composed mainly of Lisp functions. This chapter
|
||
explains what functions are, how they accept arguments, and how to
|
||
define them.
|
||
|
||
@menu
|
||
* What Is a Function:: Lisp functions vs. primitives; terminology.
|
||
* Lambda Expressions:: How functions are expressed as Lisp objects.
|
||
* Function Names:: A symbol can serve as the name of a function.
|
||
* Defining Functions:: Lisp expressions for defining functions.
|
||
* Calling Functions:: How to use an existing function.
|
||
* Mapping Functions:: Applying a function to each element of a list, etc.
|
||
* Anonymous Functions:: Lambda expressions are functions with no names.
|
||
* Generic Functions:: Polymorphism, Emacs-style.
|
||
* Function Cells:: Accessing or setting the function definition
|
||
of a symbol.
|
||
* Closures:: Functions that enclose a lexical environment.
|
||
* OClosures:: Function objects with meta-data.
|
||
* Advising Functions:: Adding to the definition of a function.
|
||
* Obsolete Functions:: Declaring functions obsolete.
|
||
* Inline Functions:: Functions that the compiler will expand inline.
|
||
* Declare Form:: Adding additional information about a function.
|
||
* Declaring Functions:: Telling the compiler that a function is defined.
|
||
* Function Safety:: Determining whether a function is safe to call.
|
||
* Related Topics:: Cross-references to specific Lisp primitives
|
||
that have a special bearing on how functions work.
|
||
@end menu
|
||
|
||
@node What Is a Function
|
||
@section What Is a Function?
|
||
|
||
@cindex return value
|
||
@cindex value of function
|
||
@cindex argument
|
||
@cindex pure function
|
||
In a general sense, a function is a rule for carrying out a
|
||
computation given input values called @dfn{arguments}. The result of
|
||
the computation is called the @dfn{value} or @dfn{return value} of the
|
||
function. The computation can also have side effects, such as lasting
|
||
changes in the values of variables or the contents of data structures
|
||
(@pxref{Definition of side effect}). A @dfn{pure function} is a
|
||
function which, in addition to having no side effects, always returns
|
||
the same value for the same combination of arguments, regardless of
|
||
external factors such as machine type or system state.
|
||
|
||
In most computer languages, every function has a name. But in Lisp,
|
||
a function in the strictest sense has no name: it is an object which
|
||
can @emph{optionally} be associated with a symbol (e.g., @code{car})
|
||
that serves as the function name. @xref{Function Names}. When a
|
||
function has been given a name, we usually also refer to that symbol
|
||
as a ``function'' (e.g., we refer to ``the function @code{car}'').
|
||
In this manual, the distinction between a function name and the
|
||
function object itself is usually unimportant, but we will take note
|
||
wherever it is relevant.
|
||
|
||
Certain function-like objects, called @dfn{special forms} and
|
||
@dfn{macros}, also accept arguments to carry out computations.
|
||
However, as explained below, these are not considered functions in
|
||
Emacs Lisp.
|
||
|
||
Here are important terms for functions and function-like objects:
|
||
|
||
@table @dfn
|
||
@item lambda expression
|
||
A function (in the strict sense, i.e., a function object) which is
|
||
written in Lisp. These are described in the following section.
|
||
@ifnottex
|
||
@xref{Lambda Expressions}.
|
||
@end ifnottex
|
||
|
||
@item primitive
|
||
@cindex primitive
|
||
@cindex subr
|
||
@cindex built-in function
|
||
A function which is callable from Lisp but is actually written in C@.
|
||
Primitives are also called @dfn{built-in functions}, or @dfn{subrs}.
|
||
Examples include functions like @code{car} and @code{append}. In
|
||
addition, all special forms (see below) are also considered
|
||
primitives.
|
||
|
||
Usually, a function is implemented as a primitive because it is a
|
||
fundamental part of Lisp (e.g., @code{car}), or because it provides a
|
||
low-level interface to operating system services, or because it needs
|
||
to run fast. Unlike functions defined in Lisp, primitives can be
|
||
modified or added only by changing the C sources and recompiling
|
||
Emacs. See @ref{Writing Emacs Primitives}.
|
||
|
||
@item special form
|
||
A primitive that is like a function but does not evaluate all of its
|
||
arguments in the usual way. It may evaluate only some of the
|
||
arguments, or may evaluate them in an unusual order, or several times.
|
||
Examples include @code{if}, @code{and}, and @code{while}.
|
||
@xref{Special Forms}.
|
||
|
||
@item macro
|
||
@cindex macro
|
||
A construct defined in Lisp, which differs from a function in that it
|
||
translates a Lisp expression into another expression which is to be
|
||
evaluated instead of the original expression. Macros enable Lisp
|
||
programmers to do the sorts of things that special forms can do.
|
||
@xref{Macros}.
|
||
|
||
@item command
|
||
@cindex command
|
||
An object which can be invoked via the @code{command-execute}
|
||
primitive, usually due to the user typing in a key sequence
|
||
@dfn{bound} to that command. @xref{Interactive Call}. A command is
|
||
usually a function; if the function is written in Lisp, it is made
|
||
into a command by an @code{interactive} form in the function
|
||
definition (@pxref{Defining Commands}). Commands that are functions
|
||
can also be called from Lisp expressions, just like other functions.
|
||
|
||
Keyboard macros (strings and vectors) are commands also, even though
|
||
they are not functions. @xref{Keyboard Macros}. We say that a symbol
|
||
is a command if its function cell contains a command (@pxref{Symbol
|
||
Components}); such a @dfn{named command} can be invoked with
|
||
@kbd{M-x}.
|
||
|
||
@item closure
|
||
A function object that is much like a lambda expression, except that
|
||
it also encloses an environment of lexical variable bindings.
|
||
@xref{Closures}.
|
||
|
||
@item byte-code function
|
||
A function that has been compiled by the byte compiler.
|
||
@xref{Byte-Code Type}.
|
||
|
||
@item autoload object
|
||
@cindex autoload object
|
||
A place-holder for a real function. If the autoload object is called,
|
||
Emacs loads the file containing the definition of the real function,
|
||
and then calls the real function. @xref{Autoload}.
|
||
@end table
|
||
|
||
You can use the function @code{functionp} to test if an object is a
|
||
function:
|
||
|
||
@defun functionp object
|
||
This function returns @code{t} if @var{object} is any kind of
|
||
function, i.e., can be passed to @code{funcall}. Note that
|
||
@code{functionp} returns @code{t} for symbols that are function names,
|
||
and returns @code{nil} for symbols that are macros or special forms.
|
||
|
||
If @var{object} is not a function, this function ordinarily returns
|
||
@code{nil}. However, the representation of function objects is
|
||
complicated, and for efficiency reasons in rare cases this function
|
||
can return @code{t} even when @var{object} is not a function.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
It is also possible to find out how many arguments an arbitrary
|
||
function expects:
|
||
|
||
@defun func-arity function
|
||
This function provides information about the argument list of the
|
||
specified @var{function}. The returned value is a cons cell of the
|
||
form @w{@code{(@var{min} . @var{max})}}, where @var{min} is the
|
||
minimum number of arguments, and @var{max} is either the maximum
|
||
number of arguments, or the symbol @code{many} for functions with
|
||
@code{&rest} arguments, or the symbol @code{unevalled} if
|
||
@var{function} is a special form.
|
||
|
||
Note that this function might return inaccurate results in some
|
||
situations, such as the following:
|
||
|
||
@itemize @minus
|
||
@item
|
||
Functions defined using @code{apply-partially} (@pxref{Calling
|
||
Functions, apply-partially}).
|
||
|
||
@item
|
||
Functions that are advised using @code{advice-add} (@pxref{Advising
|
||
Named Functions}).
|
||
|
||
@item
|
||
Functions that determine the argument list dynamically, as part of
|
||
their code.
|
||
@end itemize
|
||
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
Unlike @code{functionp}, the next three functions do @emph{not} treat
|
||
a symbol as its function definition.
|
||
|
||
@defun subrp object
|
||
This function returns @code{t} if @var{object} is a built-in function
|
||
(i.e., a Lisp primitive).
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(subrp 'message) ; @r{@code{message} is a symbol,}
|
||
@result{} nil ; @r{not a subr object.}
|
||
@end group
|
||
@group
|
||
(subrp (symbol-function 'message))
|
||
@result{} t
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@defun byte-code-function-p object
|
||
This function returns @code{t} if @var{object} is a byte-code
|
||
function. For example:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(byte-code-function-p (symbol-function 'next-line))
|
||
@result{} t
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@defun compiled-function-p object
|
||
This function returns @code{t} if @var{object} is a function object
|
||
that is not in the form of ELisp source code but something like
|
||
machine code or byte code instead. More specifically it returns
|
||
@code{t} if the function is built-in (a.k.a.@: ``primitive'',
|
||
@pxref{What Is a Function}), or byte-compiled (@pxref{Byte
|
||
Compilation}), or natively-compiled (@pxref{Native Compilation}), or
|
||
a function loaded from a dynamic module (@pxref{Dynamic Modules}).
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@defun subr-arity subr
|
||
This works like @code{func-arity}, but only for built-in functions and
|
||
without symbol indirection. It signals an error for non-built-in
|
||
functions. We recommend to use @code{func-arity} instead.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@node Lambda Expressions
|
||
@section Lambda Expressions
|
||
@cindex lambda expression
|
||
|
||
A lambda expression is a function object written in Lisp. Here is
|
||
an example:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(lambda (x)
|
||
"Return the hyperbolic cosine of X."
|
||
(* 0.5 (+ (exp x) (exp (- x)))))
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
In Emacs Lisp, such a list is a valid expression which evaluates to
|
||
a function object.
|
||
|
||
A lambda expression, by itself, has no name; it is an @dfn{anonymous
|
||
function}. Although lambda expressions can be used this way
|
||
(@pxref{Anonymous Functions}), they are more commonly associated with
|
||
symbols to make @dfn{named functions} (@pxref{Function Names}).
|
||
Before going into these details, the following subsections describe
|
||
the components of a lambda expression and what they do.
|
||
|
||
@menu
|
||
* Lambda Components:: The parts of a lambda expression.
|
||
* Simple Lambda:: A simple example.
|
||
* Argument List:: Details and special features of argument lists.
|
||
* Function Documentation:: How to put documentation in a function.
|
||
@end menu
|
||
|
||
@node Lambda Components
|
||
@subsection Components of a Lambda Expression
|
||
|
||
A lambda expression is a list that looks like this:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(lambda (@var{arg-variables}@dots{})
|
||
[@var{documentation-string}]
|
||
[@var{interactive-declaration}]
|
||
@var{body-forms}@dots{})
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@cindex lambda list
|
||
The first element of a lambda expression is always the symbol
|
||
@code{lambda}. This indicates that the list represents a function. The
|
||
reason functions are defined to start with @code{lambda} is so that
|
||
other lists, intended for other uses, will not accidentally be valid as
|
||
functions.
|
||
|
||
The second element is a list of symbols---the argument variable
|
||
names (@pxref{Argument List}).
|
||
This is called the @dfn{lambda list}. When a Lisp function is called,
|
||
the argument values are matched up against the variables in the lambda
|
||
list, which are given local bindings with the values provided.
|
||
@xref{Local Variables}.
|
||
|
||
The documentation string is a Lisp string object placed within the
|
||
function definition to describe the function for the Emacs help
|
||
facilities. @xref{Function Documentation}.
|
||
|
||
The interactive declaration is a list of the form @code{(interactive
|
||
@var{code-string})}. This declares how to provide arguments if the
|
||
function is used interactively. Functions with this declaration are called
|
||
@dfn{commands}; they can be called using @kbd{M-x} or bound to a key.
|
||
Functions not intended to be called in this way should not have interactive
|
||
declarations. @xref{Defining Commands}, for how to write an interactive
|
||
declaration.
|
||
|
||
@cindex body of function
|
||
The rest of the elements are the @dfn{body} of the function: the Lisp
|
||
code to do the work of the function (or, as a Lisp programmer would say,
|
||
``a list of Lisp forms to evaluate''). The value returned by the
|
||
function is the value returned by the last element of the body.
|
||
|
||
@node Simple Lambda
|
||
@subsection A Simple Lambda Expression Example
|
||
|
||
Consider the following example:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(lambda (a b c) (+ a b c))
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
We can call this function by passing it to @code{funcall}, like this:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(funcall (lambda (a b c) (+ a b c))
|
||
1 2 3)
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
This call evaluates the body of the lambda expression with the variable
|
||
@code{a} bound to 1, @code{b} bound to 2, and @code{c} bound to 3.
|
||
Evaluation of the body adds these three numbers, producing the result 6;
|
||
therefore, this call to the function returns the value 6.
|
||
|
||
Note that the arguments can be the results of other function calls, as in
|
||
this example:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(funcall (lambda (a b c) (+ a b c))
|
||
1 (* 2 3) (- 5 4))
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
This evaluates the arguments @code{1}, @code{(* 2 3)}, and @code{(- 5
|
||
4)} from left to right. Then it applies the lambda expression to the
|
||
argument values 1, 6 and 1 to produce the value 8.
|
||
|
||
As these examples show, you can use a form with a lambda expression
|
||
as its @sc{car} to make local variables and give them values. In the
|
||
old days of Lisp, this technique was the only way to bind and
|
||
initialize local variables. But nowadays, it is clearer to use the
|
||
special form @code{let} for this purpose (@pxref{Local Variables}).
|
||
Lambda expressions are mainly used as anonymous functions for passing
|
||
as arguments to other functions (@pxref{Anonymous Functions}), or
|
||
stored as symbol function definitions to produce named functions
|
||
(@pxref{Function Names}).
|
||
|
||
@node Argument List
|
||
@subsection Features of Argument Lists
|
||
@kindex wrong-number-of-arguments
|
||
@cindex argument binding
|
||
@cindex binding arguments
|
||
@cindex argument lists, features
|
||
|
||
Our simple sample function, @code{(lambda (a b c) (+ a b c))},
|
||
specifies three argument variables, so it must be called with three
|
||
arguments: if you try to call it with only two arguments or four
|
||
arguments, you get a @code{wrong-number-of-arguments} error
|
||
(@pxref{Errors}).
|
||
|
||
It is often convenient to write a function that allows certain
|
||
arguments to be omitted. For example, the function @code{substring}
|
||
accepts three arguments---a string, the start index and the end
|
||
index---but the third argument defaults to the @var{length} of the
|
||
string if you omit it. It is also convenient for certain functions to
|
||
accept an indefinite number of arguments, as the functions @code{list}
|
||
and @code{+} do.
|
||
|
||
@cindex optional arguments
|
||
@cindex rest arguments
|
||
@kindex &optional
|
||
@kindex &rest
|
||
To specify optional arguments that may be omitted when a function
|
||
is called, simply include the keyword @code{&optional} before the optional
|
||
arguments. To specify a list of zero or more extra arguments, include the
|
||
keyword @code{&rest} before one final argument.
|
||
|
||
Thus, the complete syntax for an argument list is as follows:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(@var{required-vars}@dots{}
|
||
@r{[}&optional @r{[}@var{optional-vars}@dots{}@r{]}@r{]}
|
||
@r{[}&rest @var{rest-var}@r{]})
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
The square brackets indicate that the @code{&optional} and @code{&rest}
|
||
clauses, and the variables that follow them, are optional.
|
||
|
||
A call to the function requires one actual argument for each of the
|
||
@var{required-vars}. There may be actual arguments for zero or more of
|
||
the @var{optional-vars}, and there cannot be any actual arguments beyond
|
||
that unless the lambda list uses @code{&rest}. In that case, there may
|
||
be any number of extra actual arguments.
|
||
|
||
If actual arguments for the optional and rest variables are omitted,
|
||
then they always default to @code{nil}. There is no way for the
|
||
function to distinguish between an explicit argument of @code{nil} and
|
||
an omitted argument. However, the body of the function is free to
|
||
consider @code{nil} an abbreviation for some other meaningful value.
|
||
This is what @code{substring} does; @code{nil} as the third argument to
|
||
@code{substring} means to use the length of the string supplied.
|
||
|
||
@cindex CL note---default optional arg
|
||
@quotation
|
||
@b{Common Lisp note:} Common Lisp allows the function to specify what
|
||
default value to use when an optional argument is omitted; Emacs Lisp
|
||
always uses @code{nil}. Emacs Lisp does not support @code{supplied-p}
|
||
variables that tell you whether an argument was explicitly passed.
|
||
@end quotation
|
||
|
||
For example, an argument list that looks like this:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(a b &optional c d &rest e)
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
binds @code{a} and @code{b} to the first two actual arguments, which are
|
||
required. If one or two more arguments are provided, @code{c} and
|
||
@code{d} are bound to them respectively; any arguments after the first
|
||
four are collected into a list and @code{e} is bound to that list.
|
||
Thus, if there are only two arguments, @code{c}, @code{d} and @code{e}
|
||
are @code{nil}; if two or three arguments, @code{d} and @code{e} are
|
||
@code{nil}; if four arguments or fewer, @code{e} is @code{nil}. Note
|
||
that exactly five arguments with an explicit @code{nil} argument
|
||
provided for @code{e} will cause that @code{nil} argument to be passed
|
||
as a list with one element, @code{(nil)}, as with any other single
|
||
value for @code{e}.
|
||
|
||
There is no way to have required arguments following optional
|
||
ones---it would not make sense. To see why this must be so, suppose
|
||
that @code{c} in the example were optional and @code{d} were required.
|
||
Suppose three actual arguments are given; which variable would the
|
||
third argument be for? Would it be used for the @var{c}, or for
|
||
@var{d}? One can argue for both possibilities. Similarly, it makes
|
||
no sense to have any more arguments (either required or optional)
|
||
after a @code{&rest} argument.
|
||
|
||
Here are some examples of argument lists and proper calls:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(funcall (lambda (n) (1+ n)) ; @r{One required:}
|
||
1) ; @r{requires exactly one argument.}
|
||
@result{} 2
|
||
(funcall (lambda (n &optional n1) ; @r{One required and one optional:}
|
||
(if n1 (+ n n1) (1+ n))) ; @r{1 or 2 arguments.}
|
||
1 2)
|
||
@result{} 3
|
||
(funcall (lambda (n &rest ns) ; @r{One required and one rest:}
|
||
(+ n (apply '+ ns))) ; @r{1 or more arguments.}
|
||
1 2 3 4 5)
|
||
@result{} 15
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@node Function Documentation
|
||
@subsection Documentation Strings of Functions
|
||
@cindex documentation string of function
|
||
@cindex function's documentation string
|
||
|
||
A lambda expression may optionally have a @dfn{documentation string}
|
||
just after the lambda list. This string does not affect execution of
|
||
the function; it is a kind of comment, but a systematized comment
|
||
which actually appears inside the Lisp world and can be used by the
|
||
Emacs help facilities. @xref{Documentation}, for how the
|
||
documentation string is accessed.
|
||
|
||
It is a good idea to provide documentation strings for all the
|
||
functions in your program, even those that are called only from within
|
||
your program. Documentation strings are like comments, except that they
|
||
are easier to access.
|
||
|
||
The first line of the documentation string should stand on its own,
|
||
because @code{apropos} displays just this first line. It should consist
|
||
of one or two complete sentences that summarize the function's purpose.
|
||
|
||
The start of the documentation string is usually indented in the
|
||
source file, but since these spaces come before the starting
|
||
double-quote, they are not part of the string. Some people make a
|
||
practice of indenting any additional lines of the string so that the
|
||
text lines up in the program source. @emph{That is a mistake.} The
|
||
indentation of the following lines is inside the string; what looks
|
||
nice in the source code will look ugly when displayed by the help
|
||
commands.
|
||
|
||
A documentation string must always be followed by at least one Lisp
|
||
expression; otherwise, it is not a documentation string at all but the
|
||
single expression of the body and used as the return value.
|
||
When there is no meaningful value to return from a function, it is
|
||
standard practice to return @code{nil} by adding it after the
|
||
documentation string.
|
||
|
||
The last line of the documentation string can specify calling
|
||
conventions different from the actual function arguments. Write
|
||
text like this:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
\(fn @var{arglist})
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
following a blank line, at the beginning of the line, with no newline
|
||
following it inside the documentation string. (The @samp{\} is used
|
||
to avoid confusing the Emacs motion commands.) The calling convention
|
||
specified in this way appears in help messages in place of the one
|
||
derived from the actual arguments of the function.
|
||
|
||
This feature is particularly useful for macro definitions, since the
|
||
arguments written in a macro definition often do not correspond to the
|
||
way users think of the parts of the macro call.
|
||
|
||
Do not use this feature if you want to deprecate the calling
|
||
convention and favor the one you advertise by the above specification.
|
||
Instead, use the @code{advertised-calling-convention} declaration
|
||
(@pxref{Declare Form}) or @code{set-advertised-calling-convention}
|
||
(@pxref{Obsolete Functions}), because these two will cause the byte
|
||
compiler emit a warning message when it compiles Lisp programs which
|
||
use the deprecated calling convention.
|
||
|
||
@ifnottex
|
||
The @code{(fn)} feature is typically used in the following situations:
|
||
|
||
@itemize @minus
|
||
@item To spell out arguments and their purposes in a macro or a function. Example:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(defmacro lambda (&rest cdr)
|
||
"@dots{}
|
||
\(fn ARGS [DOCSTRING] [INTERACTIVE] BODY)"@dots{})
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@item To provide a more detailed description and names of arguments. Example:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(defmacro macroexp--accumulate (var+list &rest body)
|
||
"@dots{}
|
||
\(fn (VAR LIST) BODY@dots{})"
|
||
(declare (indent 1))
|
||
(let ((var (car var+list))
|
||
(list (cadr var+list))
|
||
@dots{})))
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@item To better explain the purpose of a @code{defalias}. Example:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(defalias 'abbrev-get 'get
|
||
"@dots{}
|
||
\(fn ABBREV PROP)")
|
||
@end example
|
||
@end itemize
|
||
@end ifnottex
|
||
|
||
@cindex computed documentation string
|
||
@kindex :documentation
|
||
Documentation strings are usually static, but occasionally it can be
|
||
necessary to generate them dynamically. In some cases you can do so
|
||
by writing a macro which generates at compile time the code of the
|
||
function, including the desired documentation string. But you can
|
||
also generate the docstring dynamically by writing
|
||
@code{(:documentation @var{form})} instead of the documentation
|
||
string. This will evaluate @var{form} at run-time when the function
|
||
is defined and use it as the documentation string@footnote{This only
|
||
works in code using @code{lexical-binding}.}. You can also compute
|
||
the documentation string on the fly when it is requested, by setting
|
||
the @code{function-documentation} property of the function's symbol to
|
||
a Lisp form that evaluates to a string.
|
||
|
||
For example:
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(defun adder (x)
|
||
(lambda (y)
|
||
(:documentation (format "Add %S to the argument Y." x))
|
||
(+ x y)))
|
||
(defalias 'adder5 (adder 5))
|
||
(documentation 'adder5)
|
||
@result{} "Add 5 to the argument Y."
|
||
@end group
|
||
|
||
@group
|
||
(put 'adder5 'function-documentation
|
||
'(concat (documentation (symbol-function 'adder5) 'raw)
|
||
" Consulted at " (format-time-string "%H:%M:%S")))
|
||
(documentation 'adder5)
|
||
@result{} "Add 5 to the argument Y. Consulted at 15:52:13"
|
||
(documentation 'adder5)
|
||
@result{} "Add 5 to the argument Y. Consulted at 15:52:18"
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@node Function Names
|
||
@section Naming a Function
|
||
@cindex function definition
|
||
@cindex named function
|
||
@cindex function name
|
||
|
||
A symbol can serve as the name of a function. This happens when the
|
||
symbol's @dfn{function cell} (@pxref{Symbol Components}) contains a
|
||
function object (e.g., a lambda expression). Then the symbol itself
|
||
becomes a valid, callable function, equivalent to the function object
|
||
in its function cell.
|
||
|
||
The contents of the function cell are also called the symbol's
|
||
@dfn{function definition}. The procedure of using a symbol's function
|
||
definition in place of the symbol is called @dfn{symbol function
|
||
indirection}; see @ref{Function Indirection}. If you have not given a
|
||
symbol a function definition, its function cell is said to be
|
||
@dfn{void}, and it cannot be used as a function.
|
||
|
||
In practice, nearly all functions have names, and are referred to by
|
||
their names. You can create a named Lisp function by defining a
|
||
lambda expression and putting it in a function cell (@pxref{Function
|
||
Cells}). However, it is more common to use the @code{defun} macro,
|
||
described in the next section.
|
||
@ifnottex
|
||
@xref{Defining Functions}.
|
||
@end ifnottex
|
||
|
||
We give functions names because it is convenient to refer to them by
|
||
their names in Lisp expressions. Also, a named Lisp function can
|
||
easily refer to itself---it can be recursive. Furthermore, primitives
|
||
can only be referred to textually by their names, since primitive
|
||
function objects (@pxref{Primitive Function Type}) have no read
|
||
syntax.
|
||
|
||
A function need not have a unique name. A given function object
|
||
@emph{usually} appears in the function cell of only one symbol, but
|
||
this is just a convention. It is easy to store it in several symbols
|
||
using @code{fset}; then each of the symbols is a valid name for the
|
||
same function.
|
||
|
||
Note that a symbol used as a function name may also be used as a
|
||
variable; these two uses of a symbol are independent and do not
|
||
conflict. (This is not the case in some dialects of Lisp, like
|
||
Scheme.)
|
||
|
||
By convention, if a function's symbol consists of two names
|
||
separated by @samp{--}, the function is intended for internal use and
|
||
the first part names the file defining the function. For example, a
|
||
function named @code{vc-git--rev-parse} is an internal function
|
||
defined in @file{vc-git.el}. Internal-use functions written in C have
|
||
names ending in @samp{-internal}, e.g., @code{bury-buffer-internal}.
|
||
Emacs code contributed before 2018 may follow other internal-use
|
||
naming conventions, which are being phased out.
|
||
|
||
@node Defining Functions
|
||
@section Defining Functions
|
||
@cindex defining a function
|
||
|
||
We usually give a name to a function when it is first created. This
|
||
is called @dfn{defining a function}, and we usually do it with the
|
||
@code{defun} macro. This section also describes other ways to define
|
||
a function.
|
||
|
||
@defmac defun name args [doc] [declare] [interactive] body@dots{}
|
||
@code{defun} is the usual way to define new Lisp functions. It
|
||
defines the symbol @var{name} as a function with argument list
|
||
@var{args} (@pxref{Argument List}) and body forms given by @var{body}.
|
||
Neither @var{name} nor @var{args} should be quoted.
|
||
|
||
@var{doc}, if present, should be a string specifying the function's
|
||
documentation string (@pxref{Function Documentation}). @var{declare},
|
||
if present, should be a @code{declare} form specifying function
|
||
metadata (@pxref{Declare Form}). @var{interactive}, if present,
|
||
should be an @code{interactive} form specifying how the function is to
|
||
be called interactively (@pxref{Interactive Call}).
|
||
|
||
The return value of @code{defun} is undefined.
|
||
|
||
Here are some examples:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(defun foo () 5)
|
||
(foo)
|
||
@result{} 5
|
||
@end group
|
||
|
||
@group
|
||
(defun bar (a &optional b &rest c)
|
||
(list a b c))
|
||
(bar 1 2 3 4 5)
|
||
@result{} (1 2 (3 4 5))
|
||
@end group
|
||
@group
|
||
(bar 1)
|
||
@result{} (1 nil nil)
|
||
@end group
|
||
@group
|
||
(bar)
|
||
@error{} Wrong number of arguments.
|
||
@end group
|
||
|
||
@group
|
||
(defun capitalize-backwards ()
|
||
"Upcase the last letter of the word at point."
|
||
(interactive)
|
||
(backward-word 1)
|
||
(forward-word 1)
|
||
(backward-char 1)
|
||
(capitalize-word 1))
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@cindex defining functions dynamically
|
||
Most Emacs functions are part of the source code of Lisp programs, and
|
||
are defined when the Emacs Lisp reader reads the program source before
|
||
executing it. However, you can also define functions dynamically at
|
||
run time, e.g., by generating @code{defun} calls when your program's
|
||
code is executed. If you do this, be aware that Emacs's Help
|
||
commands, such as @kbd{C-h f}, which present in the @file{*Help*}
|
||
buffer a button to jump to the function's definition, might be unable
|
||
to find the source code because generating a function dynamically
|
||
usually looks very different from the usual static calls to
|
||
@code{defun}. You can make the job of finding the code which
|
||
generates such functions easier by using the @code{definition-name}
|
||
property, @pxref{Standard Properties}.
|
||
|
||
@cindex override existing functions
|
||
@cindex redefine existing functions
|
||
Be careful not to redefine existing functions unintentionally.
|
||
@code{defun} redefines even primitive functions such as @code{car}
|
||
without any hesitation or notification. Emacs does not prevent you
|
||
from doing this, because redefining a function is sometimes done
|
||
deliberately, and there is no way to distinguish deliberate
|
||
redefinition from unintentional redefinition.
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
@cindex function aliases
|
||
@cindex alias, for functions
|
||
@defun defalias name definition &optional doc
|
||
@anchor{Definition of defalias}
|
||
This function defines the symbol @var{name} as a function, with
|
||
definition @var{definition}. @var{definition} can be any valid Lisp
|
||
function or macro, or a special form (@pxref{Special Forms}), or a
|
||
keymap (@pxref{Keymaps}), or a vector or string (a keyboard macro).
|
||
The return value of @code{defalias} is @emph{undefined}.
|
||
|
||
If @var{doc} is non-@code{nil}, it becomes the function documentation
|
||
of @var{name}. Otherwise, any documentation provided by
|
||
@var{definition} is used.
|
||
|
||
@cindex defalias-fset-function property
|
||
Internally, @code{defalias} normally uses @code{fset} to set the definition.
|
||
If @var{name} has a @code{defalias-fset-function} property, however,
|
||
the associated value is used as a function to call in place of @code{fset}.
|
||
|
||
The proper place to use @code{defalias} is where a specific function
|
||
or macro name is being defined---especially where that name appears
|
||
explicitly in the source file being loaded. This is because
|
||
@code{defalias} records which file defined the function, just like
|
||
@code{defun} (@pxref{Unloading}).
|
||
|
||
By contrast, in programs that manipulate function definitions for other
|
||
purposes, it is better to use @code{fset}, which does not keep such
|
||
records. @xref{Function Cells}.
|
||
|
||
If the resulting function definition chain would be circular, then
|
||
Emacs will signal a @code{cyclic-function-indirection} error.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@defun function-alias-p object
|
||
Checks whether @var{object} is a function alias. If it is, it returns
|
||
a list of symbols representing the function alias chain, else
|
||
@code{nil}. For instance, if @code{a} is an alias for @code{b}, and
|
||
@code{b} is an alias for @code{c}:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(function-alias-p 'a)
|
||
@result{} (b c)
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
There is also a second, optional argument that is obsolete and has no
|
||
effect.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
You cannot create a new primitive function with @code{defun} or
|
||
@code{defalias}, but you can use them to change the function definition of
|
||
any symbol, even one such as @code{car} or @code{x-popup-menu} whose
|
||
normal definition is a primitive. However, this is risky: for
|
||
instance, it is next to impossible to redefine @code{car} without
|
||
breaking Lisp completely. Redefining an obscure function such as
|
||
@code{x-popup-menu} is less dangerous, but it still may not work as
|
||
you expect. If there are calls to the primitive from C code, they
|
||
call the primitive's C definition directly, so changing the symbol's
|
||
definition will have no effect on them.
|
||
|
||
See also @code{defsubst}, which defines a function like @code{defun}
|
||
and tells the Lisp compiler to perform inline expansion on it.
|
||
@xref{Inline Functions}.
|
||
|
||
To undefine a function name, use @code{fmakunbound}.
|
||
@xref{Function Cells}.
|
||
|
||
@node Calling Functions
|
||
@section Calling Functions
|
||
@cindex function invocation
|
||
@cindex calling a function
|
||
|
||
Defining functions is only half the battle. Functions don't do
|
||
anything until you @dfn{call} them, i.e., tell them to run. Calling a
|
||
function is also known as @dfn{invocation}.
|
||
|
||
The most common way of invoking a function is by evaluating a list.
|
||
For example, evaluating the list @code{(concat "a" "b")} calls the
|
||
function @code{concat} with arguments @code{"a"} and @code{"b"}.
|
||
@xref{Evaluation}, for a description of evaluation.
|
||
|
||
When you write a list as an expression in your program, you specify
|
||
which function to call, and how many arguments to give it, in the text
|
||
of the program. Usually that's just what you want. Occasionally you
|
||
need to compute at run time which function to call. To do that, use
|
||
the function @code{funcall}. When you also need to determine at run
|
||
time how many arguments to pass, use @code{apply}.
|
||
|
||
@defun funcall function &rest arguments
|
||
@code{funcall} calls @var{function} with @var{arguments}, and returns
|
||
whatever @var{function} returns.
|
||
|
||
Since @code{funcall} is a function, all of its arguments, including
|
||
@var{function}, are evaluated before @code{funcall} is called. This
|
||
means that you can use any expression to obtain the function to be
|
||
called. It also means that @code{funcall} does not see the
|
||
expressions you write for the @var{arguments}, only their values.
|
||
These values are @emph{not} evaluated a second time in the act of
|
||
calling @var{function}; the operation of @code{funcall} is like the
|
||
normal procedure for calling a function, once its arguments have
|
||
already been evaluated.
|
||
|
||
The argument @var{function} must be either a Lisp function or a
|
||
primitive function. Special forms and macros are not allowed, because
|
||
they make sense only when given the unevaluated argument
|
||
expressions. @code{funcall} cannot provide these because, as we saw
|
||
above, it never knows them in the first place.
|
||
|
||
If you need to use @code{funcall} to call a command and make it behave
|
||
as if invoked interactively, use @code{funcall-interactively}
|
||
(@pxref{Interactive Call}).
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(setq f 'list)
|
||
@result{} list
|
||
@end group
|
||
@group
|
||
(funcall f 'x 'y 'z)
|
||
@result{} (x y z)
|
||
@end group
|
||
@group
|
||
(funcall f 'x 'y '(z))
|
||
@result{} (x y (z))
|
||
@end group
|
||
@group
|
||
(funcall 'and t nil)
|
||
@error{} Invalid function: #<subr and>
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
Compare these examples with the examples of @code{apply}.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@defun apply function &rest arguments
|
||
@code{apply} calls @var{function} with @var{arguments}, just like
|
||
@code{funcall} but with one difference: the last of @var{arguments} is a
|
||
list of objects, which are passed to @var{function} as separate
|
||
arguments, rather than a single list. We say that @code{apply}
|
||
@dfn{spreads} this list so that each individual element becomes an
|
||
argument.
|
||
|
||
@code{apply} with a single argument is special: the first element of
|
||
the argument, which must be a non-empty list, is called as a function
|
||
with the remaining elements as individual arguments. Passing two or
|
||
more arguments will be faster.
|
||
|
||
@code{apply} returns the result of calling @var{function}. As with
|
||
@code{funcall}, @var{function} must either be a Lisp function or a
|
||
primitive function; special forms and macros do not make sense in
|
||
@code{apply}.
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(setq f 'list)
|
||
@result{} list
|
||
@end group
|
||
@group
|
||
(apply f 'x 'y 'z)
|
||
@error{} Wrong type argument: listp, z
|
||
@end group
|
||
@group
|
||
(apply '+ 1 2 '(3 4))
|
||
@result{} 10
|
||
@end group
|
||
@group
|
||
(apply '+ '(1 2 3 4))
|
||
@result{} 10
|
||
@end group
|
||
|
||
@group
|
||
(apply 'append '((a b c) nil (x y z) nil))
|
||
@result{} (a b c x y z)
|
||
@end group
|
||
|
||
@group
|
||
(apply '(+ 3 4))
|
||
@result{} 7
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
For an interesting example of using @code{apply}, see @ref{Definition
|
||
of mapcar}.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@cindex partial application of functions
|
||
@cindex currying
|
||
Sometimes it is useful to fix some of the function's arguments at
|
||
certain values, and leave the rest of arguments for when the function
|
||
is actually called. The act of fixing some of the function's
|
||
arguments is called @dfn{partial application} of the function@footnote{
|
||
This is related to, but different from @dfn{currying}, which
|
||
transforms a function that takes multiple arguments in such a way that
|
||
it can be called as a chain of functions, each one with a single
|
||
argument.}.
|
||
The result is a new function that accepts the rest of
|
||
arguments and calls the original function with all the arguments
|
||
combined.
|
||
|
||
Here's how to do partial application in Emacs Lisp:
|
||
|
||
@defun apply-partially func &rest args
|
||
This function returns a new function which, when called, will call
|
||
@var{func} with the list of arguments composed from @var{args} and
|
||
additional arguments specified at the time of the call. If @var{func}
|
||
accepts @var{n} arguments, then a call to @code{apply-partially} with
|
||
@w{@code{@var{m} <= @var{n}}} arguments will produce a new function of
|
||
@w{@code{@var{n} - @var{m}}} arguments@footnote{
|
||
If the number of arguments that @var{func} can accept is unlimited,
|
||
then the new function will also accept an unlimited number of
|
||
arguments, so in that case @code{apply-partially} doesn't reduce the
|
||
number of arguments that the new function could accept.
|
||
}.
|
||
|
||
Here's how we could define the built-in function @code{1+}, if it
|
||
didn't exist, using @code{apply-partially} and @code{+}, another
|
||
built-in function@footnote{
|
||
Note that unlike the built-in function, this version accepts any
|
||
number of arguments.
|
||
}:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(defalias '1+ (apply-partially '+ 1)
|
||
"Increment argument by one.")
|
||
@end group
|
||
@group
|
||
(1+ 10)
|
||
@result{} 11
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@cindex functionals
|
||
It is common for Lisp functions to accept functions as arguments or
|
||
find them in data structures (especially in hook variables and property
|
||
lists) and call them using @code{funcall} or @code{apply}. Functions
|
||
that accept function arguments are often called @dfn{functionals}.
|
||
|
||
Sometimes, when you call a functional, it is useful to supply a no-op
|
||
function as the argument. Here are three different kinds of no-op
|
||
functions:
|
||
|
||
@defun identity argument
|
||
This function returns @var{argument} and has no side effects.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@defun ignore &rest arguments
|
||
This function ignores any @var{arguments} and returns @code{nil}.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@defun always &rest arguments
|
||
This function ignores any @var{arguments} and returns @code{t}.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
Some functions are user-visible @dfn{commands}, which can be called
|
||
interactively (usually by a key sequence). It is possible to invoke
|
||
such a command exactly as though it was called interactively, by using
|
||
the @code{call-interactively} function. @xref{Interactive Call}.
|
||
|
||
@node Mapping Functions
|
||
@section Mapping Functions
|
||
@cindex mapping functions
|
||
|
||
A @dfn{mapping function} applies a given function (@emph{not} a
|
||
special form or macro) to each element of a list or other collection.
|
||
Emacs Lisp has several such functions; this section describes
|
||
@code{mapcar}, @code{mapc}, @code{mapconcat}, and @code{mapcan}, which
|
||
map over a list. @xref{Definition of mapatoms}, for the function
|
||
@code{mapatoms} which maps over the symbols in an obarray.
|
||
@xref{Definition of maphash}, for the function @code{maphash} which
|
||
maps over key/value associations in a hash table.
|
||
|
||
These mapping functions do not allow char-tables because a char-table
|
||
is a sparse array whose nominal range of indices is very large. To map
|
||
over a char-table in a way that deals properly with its sparse nature,
|
||
use the function @code{map-char-table} (@pxref{Char-Tables}).
|
||
|
||
@defun mapcar function sequence
|
||
@anchor{Definition of mapcar}
|
||
@code{mapcar} applies @var{function} to each element of @var{sequence}
|
||
in turn, and returns a list of the results.
|
||
|
||
The argument @var{sequence} can be any kind of sequence except a
|
||
char-table; that is, a list, a vector, a bool-vector, or a string. The
|
||
result is always a list. The length of the result is the same as the
|
||
length of @var{sequence}. For example:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(mapcar #'car '((a b) (c d) (e f)))
|
||
@result{} (a c e)
|
||
(mapcar #'1+ [1 2 3])
|
||
@result{} (2 3 4)
|
||
(mapcar #'string "abc")
|
||
@result{} ("a" "b" "c")
|
||
@end group
|
||
|
||
@group
|
||
;; @r{Call each function in @code{my-hooks}.}
|
||
(mapcar 'funcall my-hooks)
|
||
@end group
|
||
|
||
@group
|
||
(defun mapcar* (function &rest args)
|
||
"Apply FUNCTION to successive cars of all ARGS.
|
||
Return the list of results."
|
||
;; @r{If no list is exhausted,}
|
||
(if (not (memq nil args))
|
||
;; @r{apply function to @sc{car}s.}
|
||
(cons (apply function (mapcar #'car args))
|
||
(apply #'mapcar* function
|
||
;; @r{Recurse for rest of elements.}
|
||
(mapcar #'cdr args)))))
|
||
@end group
|
||
|
||
@group
|
||
(mapcar* #'cons '(a b c) '(1 2 3 4))
|
||
@result{} ((a . 1) (b . 2) (c . 3))
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@defun mapcan function sequence
|
||
This function applies @var{function} to each element of
|
||
@var{sequence}, like @code{mapcar}, but instead of collecting the
|
||
results into a list, it returns a single list with all the elements of
|
||
the results (which must be lists), by altering the results (using
|
||
@code{nconc}; @pxref{Rearrangement}). Like with @code{mapcar},
|
||
@var{sequence} can be of any type except a char-table.
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
;; @r{Contrast this:}
|
||
(mapcar #'list '(a b c d))
|
||
@result{} ((a) (b) (c) (d))
|
||
;; @r{with this:}
|
||
(mapcan #'list '(a b c d))
|
||
@result{} (a b c d)
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@defun mapc function sequence
|
||
@code{mapc} is like @code{mapcar} except that @var{function} is used for
|
||
side-effects only---the values it returns are ignored, not collected
|
||
into a list. @code{mapc} always returns @var{sequence}.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@defun mapconcat function sequence &optional separator
|
||
@code{mapconcat} applies @var{function} to each element of
|
||
@var{sequence}; the results, which must be sequences of characters
|
||
(strings, vectors, or lists), are concatenated into a single string
|
||
return value. Between each pair of result sequences, @code{mapconcat}
|
||
inserts the characters from @var{separator}, which also must be a
|
||
string, or a vector or list of characters; a @code{nil} value is
|
||
treated as the empty string. @xref{Sequences Arrays Vectors}.
|
||
|
||
The argument @var{function} must be a function that can take one
|
||
argument and returns a sequence of characters: a string, a vector, or
|
||
a list. The argument @var{sequence} can be any kind of sequence
|
||
except a char-table; that is, a list, a vector, a bool-vector, or a
|
||
string.
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(mapconcat #'symbol-name
|
||
'(The cat in the hat)
|
||
" ")
|
||
@result{} "The cat in the hat"
|
||
@end group
|
||
|
||
@group
|
||
(mapconcat (lambda (x) (format "%c" (1+ x)))
|
||
"HAL-8000")
|
||
@result{} "IBM.9111"
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@node Anonymous Functions
|
||
@section Anonymous Functions
|
||
@cindex anonymous function
|
||
|
||
Although functions are usually defined with @code{defun} and given
|
||
names at the same time, it is sometimes convenient to use an explicit
|
||
lambda expression---an @dfn{anonymous function}. Anonymous functions
|
||
are valid wherever function names are. They are often assigned as
|
||
variable values, or as arguments to functions; for instance, you might
|
||
pass one as the @var{function} argument to @code{mapcar}, which
|
||
applies that function to each element of a list (@pxref{Mapping
|
||
Functions}). @xref{describe-symbols example}, for a realistic example
|
||
of this.
|
||
|
||
When defining a lambda expression that is to be used as an anonymous
|
||
function, you can in principle use any method to construct the list.
|
||
But typically you should use the @code{lambda} macro, or the
|
||
@code{function} special form, or the @code{#'} read syntax:
|
||
|
||
@defmac lambda args [doc] [interactive] body@dots{}
|
||
This macro returns an anonymous function with argument list
|
||
@var{args}, documentation string @var{doc} (if any), interactive spec
|
||
@var{interactive} (if any), and body forms given by @var{body}.
|
||
|
||
Under dynamic binding, this macro effectively makes @code{lambda}
|
||
forms self-quoting: evaluating a form whose @sc{car} is @code{lambda}
|
||
yields the form itself:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(lambda (x) (* x x))
|
||
@result{} (lambda (x) (* x x))
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
Note that when evaluating under lexical binding the result is a
|
||
closure object (@pxref{Closures}).
|
||
|
||
The @code{lambda} form has one other effect: it tells the Emacs
|
||
evaluator and byte-compiler that its argument is a function, by using
|
||
@code{function} as a subroutine (see below).
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
@defspec function function-object
|
||
@cindex function quoting
|
||
This special form returns @var{function-object} without evaluating it.
|
||
In this, it is similar to @code{quote} (@pxref{Quoting}). But unlike
|
||
@code{quote}, it also serves as a note to the Emacs evaluator and
|
||
byte-compiler that @var{function-object} is intended to be used as a
|
||
function. Assuming @var{function-object} is a valid lambda
|
||
expression, this has two effects:
|
||
|
||
@itemize
|
||
@item
|
||
When the code is byte-compiled, @var{function-object} is compiled into
|
||
a byte-code function object (@pxref{Byte Compilation}).
|
||
|
||
@item
|
||
When lexical binding is enabled, @var{function-object} is converted
|
||
into a closure. @xref{Closures}.
|
||
@end itemize
|
||
|
||
When @var{function-object} is a symbol and the code is byte compiled,
|
||
the byte-compiler will warn if that function is not defined or might
|
||
not be known at run time.
|
||
@end defspec
|
||
|
||
@cindex @samp{#'} syntax
|
||
The read syntax @code{#'} is a short-hand for using @code{function}.
|
||
The following forms are all equivalent:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(lambda (x) (* x x))
|
||
(function (lambda (x) (* x x)))
|
||
#'(lambda (x) (* x x))
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
In the following example, we define a @code{change-property}
|
||
function that takes a function as its third argument, followed by a
|
||
@code{double-property} function that makes use of
|
||
@code{change-property} by passing it an anonymous function:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(defun change-property (symbol prop function)
|
||
(let ((value (get symbol prop)))
|
||
(put symbol prop (funcall function value))))
|
||
@end group
|
||
|
||
@group
|
||
(defun double-property (symbol prop)
|
||
(change-property symbol prop (lambda (x) (* 2 x))))
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
Note that we do not quote the @code{lambda} form.
|
||
|
||
If you compile the above code, the anonymous function is also
|
||
compiled. This would not happen if, say, you had constructed the
|
||
anonymous function by quoting it as a list:
|
||
|
||
@c Do not unquote this lambda!
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(defun double-property (symbol prop)
|
||
(change-property symbol prop '(lambda (x) (* 2 x))))
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
In that case, the anonymous function is kept as a lambda expression in
|
||
the compiled code. The byte-compiler cannot assume this list is a
|
||
function, even though it looks like one, since it does not know that
|
||
@code{change-property} intends to use it as a function.
|
||
|
||
@node Generic Functions
|
||
@section Generic Functions
|
||
@cindex generic functions
|
||
@cindex polymorphism
|
||
|
||
Functions defined using @code{defun} have a hard-coded set of
|
||
assumptions about the types and expected values of their arguments.
|
||
For example, a function that was designed to handle values of its
|
||
argument that are either numbers or lists of numbers will fail or
|
||
signal an error if called with a value of any other type, such as a
|
||
vector or a string. This happens because the implementation of the
|
||
function is not prepared to deal with types other than those assumed
|
||
during the design.
|
||
|
||
By contrast, object-oriented programs use @dfn{polymorphic
|
||
functions}: a set of specialized functions having the same name, each
|
||
one of which was written for a certain specific set of argument types.
|
||
Which of the functions is actually called is decided at run time based
|
||
on the types of the actual arguments.
|
||
|
||
@cindex CLOS
|
||
Emacs provides support for polymorphism. Like other Lisp
|
||
environments, notably Common Lisp and its Common Lisp Object System
|
||
(@acronym{CLOS}), this support is based on @dfn{generic functions}.
|
||
The Emacs generic functions closely follow @acronym{CLOS}, including
|
||
use of similar names, so if you have experience with @acronym{CLOS},
|
||
the rest of this section will sound very familiar.
|
||
|
||
A generic function specifies an abstract operation, by defining its
|
||
name and list of arguments, but (usually) no implementation. The
|
||
actual implementation for several specific classes of arguments is
|
||
provided by @dfn{methods}, which should be defined separately. Each
|
||
method that implements a generic function has the same name as the
|
||
generic function, but the method's definition indicates what kinds of
|
||
arguments it can handle by @dfn{specializing} the arguments defined by
|
||
the generic function. These @dfn{argument specializers} can be more
|
||
or less specific; for example, a @code{string} type is more specific
|
||
than a more general type, such as @code{sequence}.
|
||
|
||
Note that, unlike in message-based OO languages, such as C@t{++} and
|
||
Simula, methods that implement generic functions don't belong to a
|
||
class, they belong to the generic function they implement.
|
||
|
||
When a generic function is invoked, it selects the applicable
|
||
methods by comparing the actual arguments passed by the caller with
|
||
the argument specializers of each method. A method is applicable if
|
||
the actual arguments of the call are compatible with the method's
|
||
specializers. If more than one method is applicable, they are
|
||
combined using certain rules, described below, and the combination
|
||
then handles the call.
|
||
|
||
@defmac cl-defgeneric name arguments [documentation] [options-and-methods@dots{}] &rest body
|
||
This macro defines a generic function with the specified @var{name}
|
||
and @var{arguments}. If @var{body} is present, it provides the
|
||
default implementation. If @var{documentation} is present (it should
|
||
always be), it specifies the documentation string for the generic
|
||
function, in the form @code{(:documentation @var{docstring})}. The
|
||
optional @var{options-and-methods} can be one of the following forms:
|
||
|
||
@table @code
|
||
@item (declare @var{declarations})
|
||
A declare form, as described in @ref{Declare Form}.
|
||
@item (:argument-precedence-order &rest @var{args})
|
||
This form affects the sorting order for combining applicable methods.
|
||
Normally, when two methods are compared during combination, method
|
||
arguments are examined left to right, and the first method whose
|
||
argument specializer is more specific will come before the other one.
|
||
The order defined by this form overrides that, and the arguments are
|
||
examined according to their order in this form, and not left to right.
|
||
@item (:method [@var{qualifiers}@dots{}] args &rest body)
|
||
This form defines a method like @code{cl-defmethod} does.
|
||
@end table
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
@defmac cl-defmethod name [extra] [qualifier] arguments [&context (expr spec)@dots{}] &rest [docstring] body
|
||
This macro defines a particular implementation for the generic
|
||
function called @var{name}. The implementation code is given by
|
||
@var{body}. If present, @var{docstring} is the documentation string
|
||
for the method. The @var{arguments} list, which must be identical in
|
||
all the methods that implement a generic function, and must match the
|
||
argument list of that function, provides argument specializers of the
|
||
form @code{(@var{arg} @var{spec})}, where @var{arg} is the argument
|
||
name as specified in the @code{cl-defgeneric} call, and @var{spec} is
|
||
one of the following specializer forms:
|
||
|
||
@table @code
|
||
@item @var{type}
|
||
This specializer requires the argument to be of the given @var{type},
|
||
one of the types from the type hierarchy described below.
|
||
@item (eql @var{object})
|
||
This specializer requires the argument be @code{eql} to the given
|
||
@var{object}.
|
||
@item (head @var{object})
|
||
The argument must be a cons cell whose @code{car} is @code{eql} to
|
||
@var{object}.
|
||
@item @var{struct-type}
|
||
The argument must be an instance of a class named @var{struct-type}
|
||
defined with @code{cl-defstruct} (@pxref{Structures,,, cl, Common Lisp
|
||
Extensions for GNU Emacs Lisp}), or of one of its child classes.
|
||
@end table
|
||
|
||
Method definitions can make use of a new argument-list keyword,
|
||
@code{&context}, which introduces extra specializers that test the
|
||
environment at the time the method is run. This keyword should appear
|
||
after the list of required arguments, but before any @code{&rest} or
|
||
@code{&optional} keywords. The @code{&context} specializers look much
|
||
like regular argument specializers---(@var{expr} @var{spec})---except
|
||
that @var{expr} is an expression to be evaluated in the current
|
||
context, and the @var{spec} is a value to compare against. For
|
||
example, @code{&context (overwrite-mode (eql t))} will make the method
|
||
applicable only when @code{overwrite-mode} is turned on. The
|
||
@code{&context} keyword can be followed by any number of context
|
||
specializers. Because the context specializers are not part of the
|
||
generic function's argument signature, they may be omitted in methods
|
||
that don't require them.
|
||
|
||
The type specializer, @code{(@var{arg} @var{type})}, can specify one
|
||
of the @dfn{system types} in the following list. When a parent type
|
||
is specified, an argument whose type is any of its more specific child
|
||
types, as well as grand-children, grand-grand-children, etc. will also
|
||
be compatible.
|
||
|
||
@table @code
|
||
@item integer
|
||
Parent type: @code{number}.
|
||
@item number
|
||
@item null
|
||
Parent type: @code{symbol}
|
||
@item symbol
|
||
@item string
|
||
Parent type: @code{array}.
|
||
@item array
|
||
Parent type: @code{sequence}.
|
||
@item cons
|
||
Parent type: @code{list}.
|
||
@item list
|
||
Parent type: @code{sequence}.
|
||
@item marker
|
||
@item overlay
|
||
@item float
|
||
Parent type: @code{number}.
|
||
@item window-configuration
|
||
@item process
|
||
@item window
|
||
@item subr
|
||
@item compiled-function
|
||
@item buffer
|
||
@item char-table
|
||
Parent type: @code{array}.
|
||
@item bool-vector
|
||
Parent type: @code{array}.
|
||
@item vector
|
||
Parent type: @code{array}.
|
||
@item frame
|
||
@item hash-table
|
||
@item font-spec
|
||
@item font-entity
|
||
@item font-object
|
||
@end table
|
||
|
||
The optional @var{extra} element, expressed as @samp{:extra
|
||
@var{string}}, allows you to add more methods, distinguished by
|
||
@var{string}, for the same specializers and qualifiers.
|
||
|
||
The optional @var{qualifier} allows combining several applicable
|
||
methods. If it is not present, the defined method is a @dfn{primary}
|
||
method, responsible for providing the primary implementation of the
|
||
generic function for the specialized arguments. You can also define
|
||
@dfn{auxiliary methods}, by using one of the following values as
|
||
@var{qualifier}:
|
||
|
||
@table @code
|
||
@item :before
|
||
This auxiliary method will run before the primary method. More
|
||
accurately, all the @code{:before} methods will run before the
|
||
primary, in the most-specific-first order.
|
||
@item :after
|
||
This auxiliary method will run after the primary method. More
|
||
accurately, all such methods will run after the primary, in the
|
||
most-specific-last order.
|
||
@item :around
|
||
This auxiliary method will run @emph{instead} of the primary method.
|
||
The most specific of such methods will be run before any other method.
|
||
Such methods normally use @code{cl-call-next-method}, described below,
|
||
to invoke the other auxiliary or primary methods.
|
||
@end table
|
||
|
||
Functions defined using @code{cl-defmethod} cannot be made
|
||
interactive, i.e.@: commands (@pxref{Defining Commands}), by adding
|
||
the @code{interactive} form to them. If you need a polymorphic
|
||
command, we recommend defining a normal command that calls a
|
||
polymorphic function defined via @code{cl-defgeneric} and
|
||
@code{cl-defmethod}.
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
@cindex dispatch of methods for generic function
|
||
@cindex multiple-dispatch methods
|
||
Each time a generic function is called, it builds the @dfn{effective
|
||
method} which will handle this invocation by combining the applicable
|
||
methods defined for the function. The process of finding the
|
||
applicable methods and producing the effective method is called
|
||
@dfn{dispatch}. The applicable methods are those all of whose
|
||
specializers are compatible with the actual arguments of the call.
|
||
Since all of the arguments must be compatible with the specializers,
|
||
they all determine whether a method is applicable. Methods that
|
||
explicitly specialize more than one argument are called
|
||
@dfn{multiple-dispatch methods}.
|
||
|
||
The applicable methods are sorted into the order in which they will be
|
||
combined. The method whose left-most argument specializer is the most
|
||
specific one will come first in the order. (Specifying
|
||
@code{:argument-precedence-order} as part of @code{cl-defmethod}
|
||
overrides that, as described above.) If the method body calls
|
||
@code{cl-call-next-method}, the next most-specific method will run.
|
||
If there are applicable @code{:around} methods, the most-specific of
|
||
them will run first; it should call @code{cl-call-next-method} to run
|
||
any of the less specific @code{:around} methods. Next, the
|
||
@code{:before} methods run in the order of their specificity, followed
|
||
by the primary method, and lastly the @code{:after} methods in the
|
||
reverse order of their specificity.
|
||
|
||
@defun cl-call-next-method &rest args
|
||
When invoked from within the lexical body of a primary or an
|
||
@code{:around} auxiliary method, call the next applicable method for
|
||
the same generic function. Normally, it is called with no arguments,
|
||
which means to call the next applicable method with the same arguments
|
||
that the calling method was invoked. Otherwise, the specified
|
||
arguments are used instead.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@defun cl-next-method-p
|
||
This function, when called from within the lexical body of a primary
|
||
or an @code{:around} auxiliary method, returns non-@code{nil} if there
|
||
is a next method to call.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
|
||
@node Function Cells
|
||
@section Accessing Function Cell Contents
|
||
|
||
The @dfn{function definition} of a symbol is the object stored in the
|
||
function cell of the symbol. The functions described here access, test,
|
||
and set the function cell of symbols.
|
||
|
||
See also the function @code{indirect-function}. @xref{Definition of
|
||
indirect-function}.
|
||
|
||
@defun symbol-function symbol
|
||
@kindex void-function
|
||
This returns the object in the function cell of @var{symbol}. It does
|
||
not check that the returned object is a legitimate function.
|
||
|
||
If the function cell is void, the return value is @code{nil}. To
|
||
distinguish between a function cell that is void and one set to
|
||
@code{nil}, use @code{fboundp} (see below).
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(defun bar (n) (+ n 2))
|
||
(symbol-function 'bar)
|
||
@result{} (lambda (n) (+ n 2))
|
||
@end group
|
||
@group
|
||
(fset 'baz 'bar)
|
||
@result{} bar
|
||
@end group
|
||
@group
|
||
(symbol-function 'baz)
|
||
@result{} bar
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@cindex void function cell
|
||
If you have never given a symbol any function definition, we say
|
||
that that symbol's function cell is @dfn{void}. In other words, the
|
||
function cell does not have any Lisp object in it. If you try to call
|
||
the symbol as a function, Emacs signals a @code{void-function} error.
|
||
|
||
Note that void is not the same as @code{nil} or the symbol
|
||
@code{void}. The symbols @code{nil} and @code{void} are Lisp objects,
|
||
and can be stored into a function cell just as any other object can be
|
||
(and @code{void} can be a valid function if you define it with
|
||
@code{defun}). A void function cell contains no object whatsoever.
|
||
|
||
You can test the voidness of a symbol's function definition with
|
||
@code{fboundp}. After you have given a symbol a function definition, you
|
||
can make it void once more using @code{fmakunbound}.
|
||
|
||
@defun fboundp symbol
|
||
This function returns @code{t} if the symbol has an object in its
|
||
function cell, @code{nil} otherwise. It does not check that the object
|
||
is a legitimate function.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@defun fmakunbound symbol
|
||
This function makes @var{symbol}'s function cell void, so that a
|
||
subsequent attempt to access this cell will cause a
|
||
@code{void-function} error. It returns @var{symbol}. (See also
|
||
@code{makunbound}, in @ref{Void Variables}.)
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(defun foo (x) x)
|
||
(foo 1)
|
||
@result{}1
|
||
@end group
|
||
@group
|
||
(fmakunbound 'foo)
|
||
@result{} foo
|
||
@end group
|
||
@group
|
||
(foo 1)
|
||
@error{} Symbol's function definition is void: foo
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@defun fset symbol definition
|
||
This function stores @var{definition} in the function cell of
|
||
@var{symbol}. The result is @var{definition}. Normally
|
||
@var{definition} should be a function or the name of a function, but
|
||
this is not checked. The argument @var{symbol} is an ordinary evaluated
|
||
argument.
|
||
|
||
The primary use of this function is as a subroutine by constructs that define
|
||
or alter functions, like @code{defun} or @code{advice-add} (@pxref{Advising
|
||
Functions}). You can also use it to give a symbol a function definition that
|
||
is not a function, e.g., a keyboard macro (@pxref{Keyboard Macros}):
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
;; @r{Define a named keyboard macro.}
|
||
(fset 'kill-two-lines "\^u2\^k")
|
||
@result{} "\^u2\^k"
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
If you wish to use @code{fset} to make an alternate name for a
|
||
function, consider using @code{defalias} instead. @xref{Definition of
|
||
defalias}.
|
||
|
||
If the resulting function definition chain would be circular, then
|
||
Emacs will signal a @code{cyclic-function-indirection} error.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@node Closures
|
||
@section Closures
|
||
|
||
As explained in @ref{Variable Scoping}, Emacs can optionally enable
|
||
lexical binding of variables. When lexical binding is enabled, any
|
||
named function that you create (e.g., with @code{defun}), as well as
|
||
any anonymous function that you create using the @code{lambda} macro
|
||
or the @code{function} special form or the @code{#'} syntax
|
||
(@pxref{Anonymous Functions}), is automatically converted into a
|
||
@dfn{closure}.
|
||
|
||
@cindex closure
|
||
A closure is a function that also carries a record of the lexical
|
||
environment that existed when the function was defined. When it is
|
||
invoked, any lexical variable references within its definition use the
|
||
retained lexical environment. In all other respects, closures behave
|
||
much like ordinary functions; in particular, they can be called in the
|
||
same way as ordinary functions.
|
||
|
||
@xref{Lexical Binding}, for an example of using a closure.
|
||
|
||
Currently, an Emacs Lisp closure object is represented by a list
|
||
with the symbol @code{closure} as the first element, a list
|
||
representing the lexical environment as the second element, and the
|
||
argument list and body forms as the remaining elements:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
;; @r{lexical binding is enabled.}
|
||
(lambda (x) (* x x))
|
||
@result{} (closure (t) (x) (* x x))
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
However, the fact that the internal structure of a closure is
|
||
exposed to the rest of the Lisp world is considered an internal
|
||
implementation detail. For this reason, we recommend against directly
|
||
examining or altering the structure of closure objects.
|
||
|
||
@node OClosures
|
||
@section Open Closures
|
||
@cindex oclosures
|
||
@cindex open closures
|
||
|
||
Traditionally, functions are opaque objects which offer no other
|
||
functionality but to call them. (Emacs Lisp functions aren't fully
|
||
opaque since you can extract some info out of them such as their
|
||
docstring, their arglist, or their interactive spec, but they are
|
||
still mostly opaque.) This is usually what we want, but occasionally
|
||
we need functions to expose a bit more information about themselves.
|
||
|
||
@dfn{Open closures}, or @dfn{OClosures} for short, are function
|
||
objects which carry additional type information and expose some
|
||
information about themselves in the form of slots which you can access
|
||
via accessor functions.
|
||
|
||
OClosures are defined in two steps: first you use
|
||
@code{oclosure-define} to define a new OClosure type by specifying the
|
||
slots carried by the OClosures of this type, and then you use
|
||
@code{oclosure-lambda} to create an OClosure object of a given type.
|
||
|
||
Let's say we want to define keyboard macros, i.e.@: interactive
|
||
functions which re-execute a sequence of key events (@pxref{Keyboard
|
||
Macros}). You could do it with a plain function as follows:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(defun kbd-macro (key-sequence)
|
||
(lambda (&optional arg)
|
||
(interactive "P")
|
||
(execute-kbd-macro key-sequence arg)))
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
But with such a definition there is no easy way to extract the
|
||
@var{key-sequence} from that function, for example to print it.
|
||
|
||
We can solve this problem using OClosures as follows. First we define
|
||
the type of our keyboard macros (to which we decided to add
|
||
a @code{counter} slot while at it):
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(oclosure-define kbd-macro
|
||
"Keyboard macro."
|
||
keys (counter :mutable t))
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
After which we can rewrite our @code{kbd-macro} function:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(defun kbd-macro (key-sequence)
|
||
(oclosure-lambda (kbd-macro (keys key-sequence) (counter 0))
|
||
(&optional arg)
|
||
(interactive "P")
|
||
(execute-kbd-macro keys arg)
|
||
(setq counter (1+ counter))))
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
As you can see, the @code{keys} and @code{counter} slots of the
|
||
OClosure can be accessed as local variables from within the body
|
||
of the OClosure. But we can now also access them from outside of the
|
||
body of the OClosure, for example to describe a keyboard macro:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(defun describe-kbd-macro (km)
|
||
(if (not (eq 'kbd-macro (oclosure-type km)))
|
||
(message "Not a keyboard macro")
|
||
(let ((keys (kbd-macro--keys km))
|
||
(counter (kbd-macro--counter km)))
|
||
(message "Keys=%S, called %d times" keys counter))))
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
Where @code{kbd-macro--keys} and @code{kbd-macro--counter} are
|
||
accessor functions generated by the @code{oclosure-define} macro for
|
||
oclosures whose type is @code{kbd-macro}.
|
||
|
||
@defmac oclosure-define oname &optional docstring &rest slots
|
||
This macro defines a new OClosure type along with accessor functions
|
||
for its @var{slots}. @var{oname} can be a symbol (the name of the new
|
||
type), or a list of the form
|
||
@w{@code{(@var{oname} . @var{type-props})}}, in which case
|
||
@var{type-props} is a list of additional properties of this oclosure
|
||
type. @var{slots} is a list of slot descriptions where each slot can
|
||
be either a symbol (the name of the slot) or it can be of the form
|
||
@w{@code{(@var{slot-name} . @var{slot-props})}}, where
|
||
@var{slot-props} is a property list of the corresponding slot
|
||
@var{slot-name}.
|
||
The OClosure type's properties specified by @var{type-props} can
|
||
include the following:
|
||
|
||
@table @code
|
||
@item (:predicate @var{pred-name})
|
||
This requests creation of a predicate function named @var{pred-name}.
|
||
This function will be used to recognize OClosures of the type
|
||
@var{oname}. If this type property is not specified,
|
||
@code{oclosure-define} will generate a default name for the
|
||
predicate.
|
||
@item (:parent @var{otype})
|
||
This makes type @var{otype} of OClosures be the parent of the type
|
||
@var{oname}. The OClosures of type @var{oname} inherit the
|
||
@var{slots} defined by their parent type.
|
||
@c FIXME: Is the above description of :parent correct?
|
||
@item (:copier @var{copier-name} @var{copier-args})
|
||
This causes the definition of a functional update function, knows as
|
||
the @dfn{copier}, which takes an OClosure of type @var{oname} as its
|
||
first argument and returns a copy of it with the slots named in
|
||
@var{copier-args} modified to contain the value passed in the
|
||
corresponding argument in the actual call to @var{copier-name}.
|
||
@end table
|
||
|
||
For each slot in @var{slots}, the @code{oclosure-define} macro creates
|
||
an accessor function named @code{@var{oname}--@var{slot-name}}; these
|
||
can be used to access the values of the slots. The slot definitions
|
||
in @var{slots} can specify the following properties of the slots:
|
||
|
||
@table @code
|
||
@item :mutable @var{val}
|
||
By default, slots are immutable, but if you specify the
|
||
@code{:mutable} property with a non-@code{nil} value, the slot can be
|
||
mutated, for example with @code{setf} (@pxref{Setting Generalized
|
||
Variables}).
|
||
@c FIXME: Some rationale and meaning of immutable slot is probably in
|
||
@c order here.
|
||
@item :type @var{val-type}
|
||
This specifies the type of the values expected to appear in the slot.
|
||
@c FIXME: What will happen if the value is of a different type? error?
|
||
@end table
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
@defmac oclosure-lambda (type . slots) arglist &rest body
|
||
This macro creates an anonymous OClosure of type @var{type}, which
|
||
should have been defined with @code{oclosure-define}. @var{slots}
|
||
should be a list of elements of the form
|
||
@w{@code{(@var{slot-name} @var{expr})}}. At run time, each @var{expr}
|
||
is evaluated, in order, after which the OClosure is created with its
|
||
slots initialized with the resulting values.
|
||
|
||
When called as a function (@pxref{Calling Functions}), the OClosure
|
||
created by this macro will accept arguments according to @var{arglist}
|
||
and will execute the code in @var{body}. @var{body} can refer to the
|
||
value of any of its slot directly as if it were a local variable that
|
||
had been captured by static scoping.
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
@defun oclosure-type object
|
||
This function returns the OClosure type (a symbol) of @var{object} if
|
||
it is an OClosure, and @code{nil} otherwise.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
One other function related to OClosures is
|
||
@code{oclosure-interactive-form}, which allows some types of OClosures
|
||
to compute their interactive forms dynamically. @xref{Using
|
||
Interactive, oclosure-interactive-form}.
|
||
|
||
|
||
@node Advising Functions
|
||
@section Advising Emacs Lisp Functions
|
||
@cindex advising functions
|
||
@cindex piece of advice
|
||
|
||
When you need to modify a function defined in another library, or when you need
|
||
to modify a hook like @code{@var{foo}-function}, a process filter, or basically
|
||
any variable or object field which holds a function value, you can use the
|
||
appropriate setter function, such as @code{fset} or @code{defun} for named
|
||
functions, @code{setq} for hook variables, or @code{set-process-filter} for
|
||
process filters, but those are often too blunt, completely throwing away the
|
||
previous value.
|
||
|
||
The @dfn{advice} feature lets you add to the existing definition of
|
||
a function, by @dfn{advising the function}. This is a cleaner method
|
||
than redefining the whole function.
|
||
|
||
Emacs's advice system provides two sets of primitives for that: the core set,
|
||
for function values held in variables and object fields (with the corresponding
|
||
primitives being @code{add-function} and @code{remove-function}) and another
|
||
set layered on top of it for named functions (with the main primitives being
|
||
@code{advice-add} and @code{advice-remove}).
|
||
|
||
As a trivial example, here's how to add advice that'll modify the
|
||
return value of a function every time it's called:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(defun my-double (x)
|
||
(* x 2))
|
||
(defun my-increase (x)
|
||
(+ x 1))
|
||
(advice-add 'my-double :filter-return #'my-increase)
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
After adding this advice, if you call @code{my-double} with @samp{3},
|
||
the return value will be @samp{7}. To remove this advice, say
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(advice-remove 'my-double #'my-increase)
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
A more advanced example would be to trace the calls to the process
|
||
filter of a process @var{proc}:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(defun my-tracing-function (proc string)
|
||
(message "Proc %S received %S" proc string))
|
||
|
||
(add-function :before (process-filter @var{proc}) #'my-tracing-function)
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
This will cause the process's output to be passed to @code{my-tracing-function}
|
||
before being passed to the original process filter. @code{my-tracing-function}
|
||
receives the same arguments as the original function. When you're done with
|
||
it, you can revert to the untraced behavior with:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(remove-function (process-filter @var{proc}) #'my-tracing-function)
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
Similarly, if you want to trace the execution of the function named
|
||
@code{display-buffer}, you could use:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(defun his-tracing-function (orig-fun &rest args)
|
||
(message "display-buffer called with args %S" args)
|
||
(let ((res (apply orig-fun args)))
|
||
(message "display-buffer returned %S" res)
|
||
res))
|
||
|
||
(advice-add 'display-buffer :around #'his-tracing-function)
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
Here, @code{his-tracing-function} is called instead of the original function
|
||
and receives the original function (additionally to that function's arguments)
|
||
as argument, so it can call it if and when it needs to.
|
||
When you're tired of seeing this output, you can revert to the untraced
|
||
behavior with:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(advice-remove 'display-buffer #'his-tracing-function)
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
The arguments @code{:before} and @code{:around} used in the above examples
|
||
specify how the two functions are composed, since there are many different
|
||
ways to do it. The added function is also called a piece of @emph{advice}.
|
||
|
||
@menu
|
||
* Core Advising Primitives:: Primitives to manipulate advice.
|
||
* Advising Named Functions:: Advising named functions.
|
||
* Advice Combinators:: Ways to compose advice.
|
||
* Porting Old Advice:: Adapting code using the old defadvice.
|
||
* Advice and Byte Code:: Not all functions can be advised.
|
||
@end menu
|
||
|
||
@node Core Advising Primitives
|
||
@subsection Primitives to manipulate advices
|
||
@cindex advice, add and remove
|
||
|
||
@defmac add-function where place function &optional props
|
||
This macro is the handy way to add the advice @var{function} to the function
|
||
stored in @var{place} (@pxref{Generalized Variables}).
|
||
|
||
@var{where} determines how @var{function} is composed with the
|
||
existing function, e.g., whether @var{function} should be called before, or
|
||
after the original function. @xref{Advice Combinators}, for the list of
|
||
available ways to compose the two functions.
|
||
|
||
When modifying a variable (whose name will usually end with @code{-function}),
|
||
you can choose whether @var{function} is used globally or only in the current
|
||
buffer: if @var{place} is just a symbol, then @var{function} is added to the
|
||
global value of @var{place}. Whereas if @var{place} is of the form
|
||
@code{(local @var{symbol})}, where @var{symbol} is an expression which returns
|
||
the variable name, then @var{function} will only be added in the
|
||
current buffer. Finally, if you want to modify a lexical variable, you will
|
||
have to use @code{(var @var{variable})}.
|
||
|
||
Every function added with @code{add-function} can be accompanied by an
|
||
association list of properties @var{props}. Currently only two of those
|
||
properties have a special meaning:
|
||
|
||
@table @code
|
||
@item name
|
||
This gives a name to the advice, which @code{remove-function} can use to
|
||
identify which function to remove. Typically used when @var{function} is an
|
||
anonymous function.
|
||
|
||
@item depth
|
||
This specifies how to order the advice, should several pieces of
|
||
advice be present. By default, the depth is 0. A depth of 100
|
||
indicates that this piece of advice should be kept as deep as
|
||
possible, whereas a depth of @minus{}100 indicates that it should stay as the
|
||
outermost piece. When two pieces of advice specify the same depth,
|
||
the most recently added one will be outermost.
|
||
|
||
For @code{:before} advice, being outermost means that this advice will
|
||
be run first, before any other advice, whereas being innermost means
|
||
that it will run right before the original function, with no other
|
||
advice run between itself and the original function. Similarly, for
|
||
@code{:after} advice innermost means that it will run right after the
|
||
original function, with no other advice run in between, whereas
|
||
outermost means that it will be run right at the end after all other
|
||
advice. An innermost @code{:override} piece of advice will only
|
||
override the original function and other pieces of advice will apply
|
||
to it, whereas an outermost @code{:override} piece of advice will
|
||
override not only the original function but all other advice applied
|
||
to it as well.
|
||
@end table
|
||
|
||
If @var{function} is not interactive, then the combined function will inherit
|
||
the interactive spec, if any, of the original function. Else, the combined
|
||
function will be interactive and will use the interactive spec of
|
||
@var{function}. One exception: if the interactive spec of @var{function}
|
||
is a function (i.e., a @code{lambda} expression or an @code{fbound}
|
||
symbol rather than an expression or a string), then the interactive
|
||
spec of the combined function will be a call to that function with
|
||
the interactive spec of the original function as sole argument. To
|
||
interpret the spec received as argument, use
|
||
@code{advice-eval-interactive-spec}.
|
||
|
||
Note: The interactive spec of @var{function} will apply to the combined
|
||
function and should hence obey the calling convention of the combined function
|
||
rather than that of @var{function}. In many cases, it makes no difference
|
||
since they are identical, but it does matter for @code{:around},
|
||
@code{:filter-args}, and @code{:filter-return}, where @var{function}
|
||
receives different arguments than the original function stored in
|
||
@var{place}.
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
@defmac remove-function place function
|
||
This macro removes @var{function} from the function stored in
|
||
@var{place}. This only works if @var{function} was added to @var{place}
|
||
using @code{add-function}.
|
||
|
||
@var{function} is compared with functions added to @var{place} using
|
||
@code{equal}, to try and make it work also with lambda expressions. It is
|
||
additionally compared also with the @code{name} property of the functions added
|
||
to @var{place}, which can be more reliable than comparing lambda expressions
|
||
using @code{equal}.
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
@defun advice-function-member-p advice function-def
|
||
Return non-@code{nil} if @var{advice} is already in @var{function-def}.
|
||
Like for @code{remove-function} above, instead of @var{advice} being the actual
|
||
function, it can also be the @code{name} of the piece of advice.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@defun advice-function-mapc f function-def
|
||
Call the function @var{f} for every piece of advice that was added to
|
||
@var{function-def}. @var{f} is called with two arguments: the advice function
|
||
and its properties.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@defun advice-eval-interactive-spec spec
|
||
Evaluate the interactive @var{spec} just like an interactive call to a function
|
||
with such a spec would, and then return the corresponding list of arguments
|
||
that was built. E.g., @code{(advice-eval-interactive-spec "r\nP")} will
|
||
return a list of three elements, containing the boundaries of the region and
|
||
the current prefix argument.
|
||
|
||
For instance, if you want to make the @kbd{C-x m}
|
||
(@code{compose-mail}) command prompt for a @samp{From:} header, you
|
||
could say something like this:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(defun my-compose-mail-advice (orig &rest args)
|
||
"Read From: address interactively."
|
||
(interactive
|
||
(lambda (spec)
|
||
(let* ((user-mail-address
|
||
(completing-read "From: "
|
||
'("one.address@@example.net"
|
||
"alternative.address@@example.net")))
|
||
(from (message-make-from user-full-name
|
||
user-mail-address))
|
||
(spec (advice-eval-interactive-spec spec)))
|
||
;; Put the From header into the OTHER-HEADERS argument.
|
||
(push (cons 'From from) (nth 2 spec))
|
||
spec)))
|
||
(apply orig args))
|
||
|
||
(advice-add 'compose-mail :around #'my-compose-mail-advice)
|
||
@end example
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@node Advising Named Functions
|
||
@subsection Advising Named Functions
|
||
@cindex advising named functions
|
||
|
||
A common use of advice is for named functions and macros.
|
||
You could just use @code{add-function} as in:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(add-function :around (symbol-function '@var{fun}) #'his-tracing-function)
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
But you should use @code{advice-add} and @code{advice-remove} for that
|
||
instead. This separate set of functions to manipulate pieces of advice applied
|
||
to named functions, offers the following extra features compared to
|
||
@code{add-function}: they know how to deal with macros and autoloaded
|
||
functions, they let @code{describe-function} preserve the original docstring as
|
||
well as document the added advice, and they let you add and remove advice
|
||
before a function is even defined.
|
||
|
||
@code{advice-add} can be useful for altering the behavior of existing calls
|
||
to an existing function without having to redefine the whole function.
|
||
However, it can be a source of bugs, since existing callers to the function may
|
||
assume the old behavior, and work incorrectly when the behavior is changed by
|
||
advice. Advice can also cause confusion in debugging, if the person doing the
|
||
debugging does not notice or remember that the function has been modified
|
||
by advice.
|
||
|
||
Note that the problems are not due to advice per se, but to the act
|
||
of modifying a named function. It is even more problematic to modify
|
||
a named function via lower-level primitives like @code{fset},
|
||
@code{defalias}, or @code{cl-letf}. From that point of view, advice
|
||
is the better way to modify a named function because it keeps track of
|
||
the modifications, so they can be listed and undone.
|
||
|
||
Modifying a named function should be reserved for
|
||
the cases where you cannot modify Emacs' behavior in any other way.
|
||
If it is possible to do the same thing via a hook, that is preferable
|
||
(@pxref{Hooks}). If you simply want to change what a particular key
|
||
does, it may be better to write a new command, and remap the old
|
||
command's key bindings to the new one (@pxref{Remapping Commands}).
|
||
|
||
If you are writing code for release, for others to use, try to avoid
|
||
including advice in it. If the function you want to advise has no
|
||
hook to do the job, please talk with the Emacs developers about adding
|
||
a suitable hook. Especially, Emacs's own source files should not put
|
||
advice on functions in Emacs. (There are currently a few exceptions
|
||
to this convention, but we aim to correct them.) It is generally
|
||
cleaner to create a new hook in @code{foo}, and make @code{bar} use
|
||
the hook, than to have @code{bar} put advice in @code{foo}.
|
||
|
||
Special forms (@pxref{Special Forms}) cannot be advised, however macros can
|
||
be advised, in much the same way as functions. Of course, this will not affect
|
||
code that has already been macro-expanded, so you need to make sure the advice
|
||
is installed before the macro is expanded.
|
||
|
||
It is possible to advise a primitive (@pxref{What Is a Function}),
|
||
but one should typically @emph{not} do so, for two reasons. Firstly,
|
||
some primitives are used by the advice mechanism, and advising them
|
||
could cause an infinite recursion. Secondly, many primitives are
|
||
called directly from C, and such calls ignore advice; hence, one ends
|
||
up in a confusing situation where some calls (occurring from Lisp
|
||
code) obey the advice and other calls (from C code) do not.
|
||
|
||
@defmac define-advice symbol (where lambda-list &optional name depth) &rest body
|
||
This macro defines a piece of advice and adds it to the function named
|
||
@var{symbol}. If @var{name} is non-nil, the advice is named
|
||
@code{@var{symbol}@@@var{name}} and installed with the name @var{name}; otherwise,
|
||
the advice is anonymous. See @code{advice-add} for explanation of
|
||
other arguments.
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
@defun advice-add symbol where function &optional props
|
||
Add the advice @var{function} to the named function @var{symbol}.
|
||
@var{where} and @var{props} have the same meaning as for @code{add-function}
|
||
(@pxref{Core Advising Primitives}).
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@deffn Command advice-remove symbol function
|
||
Remove the advice @var{function} from the named function @var{symbol}.
|
||
@var{function} can also be the @code{name} of a piece of advice. When
|
||
called interactively, prompt for both an advised @var{function} and
|
||
the advice to remove.
|
||
@end deffn
|
||
|
||
@defun advice-member-p function symbol
|
||
Return non-@code{nil} if the advice @var{function} is already in the named
|
||
function @var{symbol}. @var{function} can also be the @code{name} of
|
||
a piece of advice.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@defun advice-mapc function symbol
|
||
Call @var{function} for every piece of advice that was added to the
|
||
named function @var{symbol}. @var{function} is called with two
|
||
arguments: the advice function and its properties.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@node Advice Combinators
|
||
@subsection Ways to compose advice
|
||
|
||
Here are the different possible values for the @var{where} argument of
|
||
@code{add-function} and @code{advice-add}, specifying how the advice
|
||
@var{function} and the original function should be composed.
|
||
|
||
@table @code
|
||
@item :before
|
||
Call @var{function} before the old function. Both functions receive the
|
||
same arguments, and the return value of the composition is the return value of
|
||
the old function. More specifically, the composition of the two functions
|
||
behaves like:
|
||
@example
|
||
(lambda (&rest r) (apply @var{function} r) (apply @var{oldfun} r))
|
||
@end example
|
||
@code{(add-function :before @var{funvar} @var{function})} is comparable for
|
||
single-function hooks to @code{(add-hook '@var{hookvar} @var{function})} for
|
||
normal hooks.
|
||
|
||
@item :after
|
||
Call @var{function} after the old function. Both functions receive the
|
||
same arguments, and the return value of the composition is the return value of
|
||
the old function. More specifically, the composition of the two functions
|
||
behaves like:
|
||
@example
|
||
(lambda (&rest r) (prog1 (apply @var{oldfun} r) (apply @var{function} r)))
|
||
@end example
|
||
@code{(add-function :after @var{funvar} @var{function})} is comparable for
|
||
single-function hooks to @code{(add-hook '@var{hookvar} @var{function}
|
||
'append)} for normal hooks.
|
||
|
||
@item :override
|
||
This completely replaces the old function with the new one. The old function
|
||
can of course be recovered if you later call @code{remove-function}.
|
||
|
||
@item :around
|
||
Call @var{function} instead of the old function, but provide the old function
|
||
as an extra argument to @var{function}. This is the most flexible composition.
|
||
For example, it lets you call the old function with different arguments, or
|
||
many times, or within a let-binding, or you can sometimes delegate the work to
|
||
the old function and sometimes override it completely. More specifically, the
|
||
composition of the two functions behaves like:
|
||
@example
|
||
(lambda (&rest r) (apply @var{function} @var{oldfun} r))
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@item :before-while
|
||
Call @var{function} before the old function and don't call the old
|
||
function if @var{function} returns @code{nil}. Both functions receive the
|
||
same arguments, and the return value of the composition is the return value of
|
||
the old function. More specifically, the composition of the two functions
|
||
behaves like:
|
||
@example
|
||
(lambda (&rest r) (and (apply @var{function} r) (apply @var{oldfun} r)))
|
||
@end example
|
||
@code{(add-function :before-while @var{funvar} @var{function})} is comparable
|
||
for single-function hooks to @code{(add-hook '@var{hookvar} @var{function})}
|
||
when @var{hookvar} is run via @code{run-hook-with-args-until-failure}.
|
||
|
||
@item :before-until
|
||
Call @var{function} before the old function and only call the old function if
|
||
@var{function} returns @code{nil}. More specifically, the composition of the
|
||
two functions behaves like:
|
||
@example
|
||
(lambda (&rest r) (or (apply @var{function} r) (apply @var{oldfun} r)))
|
||
@end example
|
||
@code{(add-function :before-until @var{funvar} @var{function})} is comparable
|
||
for single-function hooks to @code{(add-hook '@var{hookvar} @var{function})}
|
||
when @var{hookvar} is run via @code{run-hook-with-args-until-success}.
|
||
|
||
@item :after-while
|
||
Call @var{function} after the old function and only if the old function
|
||
returned non-@code{nil}. Both functions receive the same arguments, and the
|
||
return value of the composition is the return value of @var{function}.
|
||
More specifically, the composition of the two functions behaves like:
|
||
@example
|
||
(lambda (&rest r) (and (apply @var{oldfun} r) (apply @var{function} r)))
|
||
@end example
|
||
@code{(add-function :after-while @var{funvar} @var{function})} is comparable
|
||
for single-function hooks to @code{(add-hook '@var{hookvar} @var{function}
|
||
'append)} when @var{hookvar} is run via
|
||
@code{run-hook-with-args-until-failure}.
|
||
|
||
@item :after-until
|
||
Call @var{function} after the old function and only if the old function
|
||
returned @code{nil}. More specifically, the composition of the two functions
|
||
behaves like:
|
||
@example
|
||
(lambda (&rest r) (or (apply @var{oldfun} r) (apply @var{function} r)))
|
||
@end example
|
||
@code{(add-function :after-until @var{funvar} @var{function})} is comparable
|
||
for single-function hooks to @code{(add-hook '@var{hookvar} @var{function}
|
||
'append)} when @var{hookvar} is run via
|
||
@code{run-hook-with-args-until-success}.
|
||
|
||
@item :filter-args
|
||
Call @var{function} first and use the result (which should be a list) as the
|
||
new arguments to pass to the old function. More specifically, the composition
|
||
of the two functions behaves like:
|
||
@example
|
||
(lambda (&rest r) (apply @var{oldfun} (funcall @var{function} r)))
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@item :filter-return
|
||
Call the old function first and pass the result to @var{function}.
|
||
More specifically, the composition of the two functions behaves like:
|
||
@example
|
||
(lambda (&rest r) (funcall @var{function} (apply @var{oldfun} r)))
|
||
@end example
|
||
@end table
|
||
|
||
|
||
@node Porting Old Advice
|
||
@subsection Adapting code using the old defadvice
|
||
@cindex old advices, porting
|
||
@c NB: The following index entries deliberately avoid ``old'',
|
||
@c an adjective that does not come to mind for those who grew up
|
||
@c on ‘defadvice’ et al. For those folks, that way is ``current''.
|
||
@c They discover its oldness reading this node.
|
||
@cindex advices, porting from @code{defadvice}
|
||
@findex defadvice
|
||
@findex ad-activate
|
||
|
||
A lot of code uses the old @code{defadvice} mechanism, which has been made
|
||
obsolete by the new @code{advice-add}, whose implementation and semantics is
|
||
significantly simpler.
|
||
|
||
An old piece of advice such as:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(defadvice previous-line (before next-line-at-end
|
||
(&optional arg try-vscroll))
|
||
"Insert an empty line when moving up from the top line."
|
||
(if (and next-line-add-newlines (= arg 1)
|
||
(save-excursion (beginning-of-line) (bobp)))
|
||
(progn
|
||
(beginning-of-line)
|
||
(newline))))
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
could be translated in the new advice mechanism into a plain function:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(defun previous-line--next-line-at-end (&optional arg try-vscroll)
|
||
"Insert an empty line when moving up from the top line."
|
||
(if (and next-line-add-newlines (= arg 1)
|
||
(save-excursion (beginning-of-line) (bobp)))
|
||
(progn
|
||
(beginning-of-line)
|
||
(newline))))
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
Obviously, this does not actually modify @code{previous-line}. For that the
|
||
old advice needed:
|
||
@example
|
||
(ad-activate 'previous-line)
|
||
@end example
|
||
whereas the new advice mechanism needs:
|
||
@example
|
||
(advice-add 'previous-line :before #'previous-line--next-line-at-end)
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
Note that @code{ad-activate} had a global effect: it activated all pieces of
|
||
advice enabled for that specified function. If you wanted to only activate or
|
||
deactivate a particular piece, you needed to @emph{enable} or @emph{disable}
|
||
it with @code{ad-enable-advice} and @code{ad-disable-advice}.
|
||
The new mechanism does away with this distinction.
|
||
|
||
Around advice such as:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(defadvice foo (around foo-around)
|
||
"Ignore case in `foo'."
|
||
(let ((case-fold-search t))
|
||
ad-do-it))
|
||
(ad-activate 'foo)
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
could translate into:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(defun foo--foo-around (orig-fun &rest args)
|
||
"Ignore case in `foo'."
|
||
(let ((case-fold-search t))
|
||
(apply orig-fun args)))
|
||
(advice-add 'foo :around #'foo--foo-around)
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
Regarding the advice's @emph{class}, note that the new @code{:before} is not
|
||
quite equivalent to the old @code{before}, because in the old advice you could
|
||
modify the function's arguments (e.g., with @code{ad-set-arg}), and that would
|
||
affect the argument values seen by the original function, whereas in the new
|
||
@code{:before}, modifying an argument via @code{setq} in the advice has no
|
||
effect on the arguments seen by the original function.
|
||
When porting @code{before} advice which relied on this behavior, you'll need
|
||
to turn it into new @code{:around} or @code{:filter-args} advice instead.
|
||
|
||
Similarly old @code{after} advice could modify the returned value by
|
||
changing @code{ad-return-value}, whereas new @code{:after} advice cannot, so
|
||
when porting such old @code{after} advice, you'll need to turn it into new
|
||
@code{:around} or @code{:filter-return} advice instead.
|
||
|
||
@c This is its own node because we link to it from *Help* buffers.
|
||
@node Advice and Byte Code
|
||
@subsection Advice and Byte Code
|
||
@cindex compiler macros, advising
|
||
@cindex @code{byte-compile} and @code{byte-optimize}, advising
|
||
|
||
Not all functions can be reliably advised. The byte compiler may
|
||
choose to replace a call to a function with a sequence of instructions
|
||
that doesn't call the function you were interested in altering.
|
||
|
||
This usually happens due to one of the three following mechanisms:
|
||
|
||
@table @asis
|
||
@item @code{byte-compile} properties
|
||
If a function's symbol has a @code{byte-compile} property, that
|
||
property will be used instead of the symbol's function definition.
|
||
@xref{Compilation Functions}.
|
||
|
||
@item @code{byte-optimize} properties
|
||
If a function's symbol has a @code{byte-optimize} property, the byte
|
||
compiler may rewrite the function arguments, or decide to use a
|
||
different function altogether.
|
||
|
||
@item @code{compiler-macro} declare forms
|
||
A function can have a special @code{compiler-macro} @code{declare}
|
||
form in its definition (@pxref{Declare Form}) that defines an
|
||
@dfn{expander} to call when compiling the function. The expander
|
||
could then cause the produced byte-code not to call the original
|
||
function.
|
||
@end table
|
||
|
||
@node Obsolete Functions
|
||
@section Declaring Functions Obsolete
|
||
@cindex obsolete functions
|
||
|
||
You can mark a named function as @dfn{obsolete}, meaning that it may
|
||
be removed at some point in the future. This causes Emacs to warn
|
||
that the function is obsolete whenever it byte-compiles code
|
||
containing that function, and whenever it displays the documentation
|
||
for that function. In all other respects, an obsolete function
|
||
behaves like any other function.
|
||
|
||
The easiest way to mark a function as obsolete is to put a
|
||
@code{(declare (obsolete @dots{}))} form in the function's
|
||
@code{defun} definition. @xref{Declare Form}. Alternatively, you can
|
||
use the @code{make-obsolete} function, described below.
|
||
|
||
A macro (@pxref{Macros}) can also be marked obsolete with
|
||
@code{make-obsolete}; this has the same effects as for a function. An
|
||
alias for a function or macro can also be marked as obsolete; this
|
||
makes the alias itself obsolete, not the function or macro which it
|
||
resolves to.
|
||
|
||
@defun make-obsolete obsolete-name current-name when
|
||
This function marks @var{obsolete-name} as obsolete.
|
||
@var{obsolete-name} should be a symbol naming a function or macro, or
|
||
an alias for a function or macro.
|
||
|
||
If @var{current-name} is a symbol, the warning message says to use
|
||
@var{current-name} instead of @var{obsolete-name}. @var{current-name}
|
||
does not need to be an alias for @var{obsolete-name}; it can be a
|
||
different function with similar functionality. @var{current-name} can
|
||
also be a string, which serves as the warning message. The message
|
||
should begin in lower case, and end with a period. It can also be
|
||
@code{nil}, in which case the warning message provides no additional
|
||
details.
|
||
|
||
The argument @var{when} should be a string indicating when the function
|
||
was first made obsolete---for example, a date or a release number.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@defmac define-obsolete-function-alias obsolete-name current-name when &optional doc
|
||
This convenience macro marks the function @var{obsolete-name} obsolete
|
||
and also defines it as an alias for the function @var{current-name}.
|
||
It is equivalent to the following:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(defalias @var{obsolete-name} @var{current-name} @var{doc})
|
||
(make-obsolete @var{obsolete-name} @var{current-name} @var{when})
|
||
@end example
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
In addition, you can mark a particular calling convention for a
|
||
function as obsolete:
|
||
|
||
@defun set-advertised-calling-convention function signature when
|
||
This function specifies the argument list @var{signature} as the
|
||
correct way to call @var{function}. This causes the Emacs byte
|
||
compiler to issue a warning whenever it comes across an Emacs Lisp
|
||
program that calls @var{function} any other way (however, it will
|
||
still allow the code to be byte compiled). @var{when} should be a
|
||
string indicating when the variable was first made obsolete (usually a
|
||
version number string).
|
||
|
||
For instance, in old versions of Emacs the @code{sit-for} function
|
||
accepted three arguments, like this
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(sit-for seconds milliseconds nodisp)
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
During a transition period, the function accepted those three
|
||
arguments, but declared this old calling convention as deprecated like
|
||
this:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(set-advertised-calling-convention
|
||
'sit-for '(seconds &optional nodisp) "22.1")
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
The alternative to using this function is the
|
||
@code{advertised-calling-convention} @code{declare} spec, see
|
||
@ref{Declare Form}.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@node Inline Functions
|
||
@section Inline Functions
|
||
@cindex inline functions
|
||
|
||
An @dfn{inline function} is a function that works just like an
|
||
ordinary function, except for one thing: when you byte-compile a call
|
||
to the function (@pxref{Byte Compilation}), the function's definition
|
||
is expanded into the caller.
|
||
|
||
The simple way to define an inline function, is to write
|
||
@code{defsubst} instead of @code{defun}. The rest of the definition
|
||
looks just the same, but using @code{defsubst} says to make it inline
|
||
for byte compilation.
|
||
|
||
@defmac defsubst name args [doc] [declare] [interactive] body@dots{}
|
||
This macro defines an inline function. Its syntax is exactly the same
|
||
as @code{defun} (@pxref{Defining Functions}).
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
Making a function inline often makes its function calls run faster.
|
||
But it also has disadvantages. For one thing, it reduces flexibility;
|
||
if you change the definition of the function, calls already inlined
|
||
still use the old definition until you recompile them.
|
||
|
||
Another disadvantage is that making a large function inline can
|
||
increase the size of compiled code both in files and in memory. Since
|
||
the speed advantage of inline functions is greatest for small
|
||
functions, you generally should not make large functions inline.
|
||
|
||
Also, inline functions do not behave well with respect to debugging,
|
||
tracing, and advising (@pxref{Advising Functions}). Since ease of
|
||
debugging and the flexibility of redefining functions are important
|
||
features of Emacs, you should not make a function inline, even if it's
|
||
small, unless its speed is really crucial, and you've timed the code
|
||
to verify that using @code{defun} actually has performance problems.
|
||
|
||
After an inline function is defined, its inline expansion can be
|
||
performed later on in the same file, just like macros.
|
||
|
||
It's possible to use @code{defmacro} to define a macro to expand
|
||
into the same code that an inline function would execute
|
||
(@pxref{Macros}). But the macro would be limited to direct use in
|
||
expressions---a macro cannot be called with @code{apply},
|
||
@code{mapcar} and so on. Also, it takes some work to convert an
|
||
ordinary function into a macro. To convert it into an inline function
|
||
is easy; just replace @code{defun} with @code{defsubst}. Since each
|
||
argument of an inline function is evaluated exactly once, you needn't
|
||
worry about how many times the body uses the arguments, as you do for
|
||
macros.
|
||
|
||
Alternatively, you can define a function by providing the code which
|
||
will inline it as a compiler macro (@pxref{Declare Form}). The
|
||
following macros make this possible.
|
||
|
||
@c FIXME: Can define-inline use the interactive spec?
|
||
@defmac define-inline name args [doc] [declare] body@dots{}
|
||
Define a function @var{name} by providing code that does its inlining,
|
||
as a compiler macro. The function will accept the argument list
|
||
@var{args} and will have the specified @var{body}.
|
||
|
||
If present, @var{doc} should be the function's documentation string
|
||
(@pxref{Function Documentation}); @var{declare}, if present, should be
|
||
a @code{declare} form (@pxref{Declare Form}) specifying the function's
|
||
metadata.
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
Functions defined via @code{define-inline} have several advantages
|
||
with respect to macros defined by @code{defsubst} or @code{defmacro}:
|
||
|
||
@itemize @minus
|
||
@item
|
||
They can be passed to @code{mapcar} (@pxref{Mapping Functions}).
|
||
|
||
@item
|
||
They are more efficient.
|
||
|
||
@item
|
||
They can be used as @dfn{place forms} to store values
|
||
(@pxref{Generalized Variables}).
|
||
|
||
@item
|
||
They behave in a more predictable way than @code{cl-defsubst}
|
||
(@pxref{Argument Lists,,, cl, Common Lisp Extensions for GNU Emacs
|
||
Lisp}).
|
||
@end itemize
|
||
|
||
Like @code{defmacro}, a function inlined with @code{define-inline}
|
||
inherits the scoping rules, either dynamic or lexical, from the call
|
||
site. @xref{Variable Scoping}.
|
||
|
||
The following macros should be used in the body of a function defined
|
||
by @code{define-inline}.
|
||
|
||
@defmac inline-quote expression
|
||
Quote @var{expression} for @code{define-inline}. This is similar to
|
||
the backquote (@pxref{Backquote}), but quotes code and accepts only
|
||
@code{,}, not @code{,@@}.
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
@defmac inline-letevals (bindings@dots{}) body@dots{}
|
||
This provides a convenient way to ensure that the arguments to an
|
||
inlined function are evaluated exactly once, as well as to create
|
||
local variables.
|
||
|
||
It's similar to @code{let} (@pxref{Local Variables}): It sets up local
|
||
variables as specified by @var{bindings}, and then evaluates
|
||
@var{body} with those bindings in effect.
|
||
|
||
Each element of @var{bindings} should be either a symbol or a list of
|
||
the form @w{@code{(@var{var} @var{expr})}}; the result is to evaluate
|
||
@var{expr} and bind @var{var} to the result. However, when an element
|
||
of @var{bindings} is just a symbol @var{var}, the result of evaluating
|
||
@var{var} is re-bound to @var{var} (which is quite different from the
|
||
way @code{let} works).
|
||
|
||
The tail of @var{bindings} can be either @code{nil} or a symbol which
|
||
should hold a list of arguments, in which case each argument is
|
||
evaluated, and the symbol is bound to the resulting list.
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
@defmac inline-const-p expression
|
||
Return non-@code{nil} if the value of @var{expression} is already
|
||
known.
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
@defmac inline-const-val expression
|
||
Return the value of @var{expression}.
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
@defmac inline-error format &rest args
|
||
Signal an error, formatting @var{args} according to @var{format}.
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
Here's an example of using @code{define-inline}:
|
||
|
||
@lisp
|
||
(define-inline myaccessor (obj)
|
||
(inline-letevals (obj)
|
||
(inline-quote (if (foo-p ,obj) (aref (cdr ,obj) 3) (aref ,obj 2)))))
|
||
@end lisp
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
This is equivalent to
|
||
|
||
@lisp
|
||
(defsubst myaccessor (obj)
|
||
(if (foo-p obj) (aref (cdr obj) 3) (aref obj 2)))
|
||
@end lisp
|
||
|
||
@node Declare Form
|
||
@section The @code{declare} Form
|
||
@findex declare
|
||
|
||
@code{declare} is a special macro which can be used to add meta
|
||
properties to a function or macro: for example, marking it as
|
||
obsolete, or giving its forms a special @key{TAB} indentation
|
||
convention in Emacs Lisp mode.
|
||
|
||
@anchor{Definition of declare}
|
||
@defmac declare specs@dots{}
|
||
This macro ignores its arguments and evaluates to @code{nil}; it has
|
||
no run-time effect. However, when a @code{declare} form occurs in the
|
||
@var{declare} argument of a @code{defun} or @code{defsubst} function
|
||
definition (@pxref{Defining Functions}) or a @code{defmacro} macro
|
||
definition (@pxref{Defining Macros}), it appends the properties
|
||
specified by @var{specs} to the function or macro. This work is
|
||
specially performed by @code{defun}, @code{defsubst}, and
|
||
@code{defmacro}.
|
||
|
||
Each element in @var{specs} should have the form @code{(@var{property}
|
||
@var{args}@dots{})}, which should not be quoted. These have the
|
||
following effects:
|
||
|
||
@table @code
|
||
@cindex @code{advertised-calling-convention} (@code{declare} spec)
|
||
@item (advertised-calling-convention @var{signature} @var{when})
|
||
This acts like a call to @code{set-advertised-calling-convention}
|
||
(@pxref{Obsolete Functions}); @var{signature} specifies the correct
|
||
argument list for calling the function or macro, and @var{when} should
|
||
be a string indicating when the old argument list was first made obsolete.
|
||
|
||
@item (debug @var{edebug-form-spec})
|
||
This is valid for macros only. When stepping through the macro with
|
||
Edebug, use @var{edebug-form-spec}. @xref{Instrumenting Macro Calls}.
|
||
|
||
@item (doc-string @var{n})
|
||
This is used when defining a function or macro which itself will be used to
|
||
define entities like functions, macros, or variables. It indicates that
|
||
the @var{n}th argument, if any, should be considered
|
||
as a documentation string.
|
||
|
||
@item (indent @var{indent-spec})
|
||
Indent calls to this function or macro according to @var{indent-spec}.
|
||
This is typically used for macros, though it works for functions too.
|
||
@xref{Indenting Macros}.
|
||
|
||
@item (interactive-only @var{value})
|
||
Set the function's @code{interactive-only} property to @var{value}.
|
||
@xref{The interactive-only property}.
|
||
|
||
@cindex @code{obsolete} (@code{declare} spec)
|
||
@item (obsolete @var{current-name} @var{when})
|
||
Mark the function or macro as obsolete, similar to a call to
|
||
@code{make-obsolete} (@pxref{Obsolete Functions}). @var{current-name}
|
||
should be a symbol (in which case the warning message says to use that
|
||
instead), a string (specifying the warning message), or @code{nil} (in
|
||
which case the warning message gives no extra details). @var{when}
|
||
should be a string indicating when the function or macro was first
|
||
made obsolete.
|
||
|
||
@cindex compiler macro
|
||
@item (compiler-macro @var{expander})
|
||
This can only be used for functions, and tells the compiler to use
|
||
@var{expander} as an optimization function. When encountering a call to the
|
||
function, of the form @code{(@var{function} @var{args}@dots{})}, the macro
|
||
expander will call @var{expander} with that form as well as with
|
||
@var{args}@dots{}, and @var{expander} can either return a new expression to use
|
||
instead of the function call, or it can return just the form unchanged,
|
||
to indicate that the function call should be left alone.
|
||
|
||
When @var{expander} is a lambda form it should be written with
|
||
a single argument (i.e., be of the form @code{(lambda (@var{arg})
|
||
@var{body})}) because the function's formal arguments are
|
||
automatically added to the lambda's list of arguments for you.
|
||
|
||
@item (gv-expander @var{expander})
|
||
Declare @var{expander} to be the function to handle calls to the macro (or
|
||
function) as a generalized variable, similarly to @code{gv-define-expander}.
|
||
@var{expander} can be a symbol or it can be of the form @code{(lambda
|
||
(@var{arg}) @var{body})} in which case that function will additionally have
|
||
access to the macro (or function)'s arguments.
|
||
|
||
@item (gv-setter @var{setter})
|
||
Declare @var{setter} to be the function to handle calls to the macro (or
|
||
function) as a generalized variable. @var{setter} can be a symbol in which
|
||
case it will be passed to @code{gv-define-simple-setter}, or it can be of the
|
||
form @code{(lambda (@var{arg}) @var{body})} in which case that function will
|
||
additionally have access to the macro (or function)'s arguments and it will
|
||
be passed to @code{gv-define-setter}.
|
||
|
||
@item (completion @var{completion-predicate})
|
||
Declare @var{completion-predicate} as a function to determine whether
|
||
to include a function's symbol in the list of functions when asking
|
||
for completions in @kbd{M-x}. This predicate function will only be
|
||
called when @code{read-extended-command-predicate} is customized to
|
||
@code{command-completion-default-include-p}; by default the value of
|
||
@code{read-extended-command-predicate} is nil (@pxref{Interactive
|
||
Call, execute-extended-command}). The predicate
|
||
@var{completion-predicate} is called with two arguments: the
|
||
function's symbol and the current buffer.
|
||
|
||
@item (modes @var{modes})
|
||
Specify that this command is meant to be applicable only to specified
|
||
@var{modes}. @xref{Command Modes}.
|
||
|
||
@item (interactive-args @var{arg} ...)
|
||
Specify the arguments that should be stored for @code{repeat-command}.
|
||
Each @var{arg} is on the form @code{@var{argument-name} @var{form}}.
|
||
|
||
@item (pure @var{val})
|
||
If @var{val} is non-@code{nil}, this function is @dfn{pure}
|
||
(@pxref{What Is a Function}). This is the same as the @code{pure}
|
||
property of the function's symbol (@pxref{Standard Properties}).
|
||
|
||
@item (side-effect-free @var{val})
|
||
If @var{val} is non-@code{nil}, this function is free of side effects,
|
||
so the byte compiler can ignore calls whose value is ignored. This is
|
||
the same as the @code{side-effect-free} property of the function's
|
||
symbol, @pxref{Standard Properties}.
|
||
|
||
@item (important-return-value @var{val})
|
||
If @var{val} is non-@code{nil}, the byte compiler will warn about
|
||
calls to this function that do not use the returned value. This is the
|
||
same as the @code{important-return-value} property of the function's
|
||
symbol, @pxref{Standard Properties}.
|
||
|
||
@item (speed @var{n})
|
||
Specify the value of @code{native-comp-speed} in effect for native
|
||
compilation of this function (@pxref{Native-Compilation Variables}).
|
||
This allows function-level control of the optimization level used for
|
||
native code emitted for the function. In particular, if @var{n} is
|
||
@minus{}1, native compilation of the function will emit bytecode
|
||
instead of native code for the function.
|
||
|
||
@item no-font-lock-keyword
|
||
This is valid for macros only. Macros with this declaration are
|
||
highlighted by font-lock (@pxref{Font Lock Mode}) as normal functions,
|
||
not specially as macros.
|
||
@end table
|
||
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
@node Declaring Functions
|
||
@section Telling the Compiler that a Function is Defined
|
||
@cindex function declaration
|
||
@cindex declaring functions
|
||
@findex declare-function
|
||
|
||
Byte-compiling a file often produces warnings about functions that the
|
||
compiler doesn't know about (@pxref{Compiler Errors}). Sometimes this
|
||
indicates a real problem, but usually the functions in question are
|
||
defined in other files which would be loaded if that code is run. For
|
||
example, byte-compiling @file{simple.el} used to warn:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
simple.el:8727:1:Warning: the function ‘shell-mode’ is not known to be
|
||
defined.
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
In fact, @code{shell-mode} is used only in a function that executes
|
||
@code{(require 'shell)} before calling @code{shell-mode}, so
|
||
@code{shell-mode} will be defined properly at run-time. When you know
|
||
that such a warning does not indicate a real problem, it is good to
|
||
suppress the warning. That makes new warnings which might mean real
|
||
problems more visible. You do that with @code{declare-function}.
|
||
|
||
All you need to do is add a @code{declare-function} statement before the
|
||
first use of the function in question:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(declare-function shell-mode "shell" ())
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
This says that @code{shell-mode} is defined in @file{shell.el} (the
|
||
@samp{.el} can be omitted). The compiler takes for granted that that file
|
||
really defines the function, and does not check.
|
||
|
||
The optional third argument specifies the argument list of
|
||
@code{shell-mode}. In this case, it takes no arguments
|
||
(@code{nil} is different from not specifying a value). In other
|
||
cases, this might be something like @code{(file &optional overwrite)}.
|
||
You don't have to specify the argument list, but if you do the
|
||
byte compiler can check that the calls match the declaration.
|
||
|
||
@defmac declare-function function file &optional arglist fileonly
|
||
Tell the byte compiler to assume that @var{function} is defined in the
|
||
file @var{file}. The optional third argument @var{arglist} is either
|
||
@code{t}, meaning the argument list is unspecified, or a list of
|
||
formal parameters in the same style as @code{defun} (including the
|
||
parentheses). An omitted @var{arglist} defaults to @code{t}, not
|
||
@code{nil}; this is atypical behavior for omitted arguments, and it
|
||
means that to supply a fourth but not third argument one must specify
|
||
@code{t} for the third-argument placeholder instead of the usual
|
||
@code{nil}. The optional fourth argument @var{fileonly}
|
||
non-@code{nil} means check only that @var{file} exists, not that it
|
||
actually defines @var{function}.
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
@findex check-declare-file
|
||
@findex check-declare-directory
|
||
To verify that these functions really are declared where
|
||
@code{declare-function} says they are, use @code{check-declare-file}
|
||
to check all @code{declare-function} calls in one source file, or use
|
||
@code{check-declare-directory} check all the files in and under a
|
||
certain directory.
|
||
|
||
These commands find the file that ought to contain a function's
|
||
definition using @code{locate-library}; if that finds no file, they
|
||
expand the definition file name relative to the directory of the file
|
||
that contains the @code{declare-function} call.
|
||
|
||
You can also say that a function is a primitive by specifying a file
|
||
name ending in @samp{.c} or @samp{.m}. This is useful only when you
|
||
call a primitive that is defined only on certain systems. Most
|
||
primitives are always defined, so they will never give you a warning.
|
||
|
||
Sometimes a file will optionally use functions from an external package.
|
||
If you prefix the filename in the @code{declare-function} statement with
|
||
@samp{ext:}, then it will be checked if it is found, otherwise skipped
|
||
without error.
|
||
|
||
There are some function definitions that @samp{check-declare} does not
|
||
understand (e.g., @code{defstruct} and some other macros). In such cases,
|
||
you can pass a non-@code{nil} @var{fileonly} argument to
|
||
@code{declare-function}, meaning to only check that the file exists, not
|
||
that it actually defines the function. Note that to do this without
|
||
having to specify an argument list, you should set the @var{arglist}
|
||
argument to @code{t} (because @code{nil} means an empty argument list, as
|
||
opposed to an unspecified one).
|
||
|
||
@node Function Safety
|
||
@section Determining whether a Function is Safe to Call
|
||
@cindex function safety
|
||
@cindex safety of functions
|
||
|
||
Some major modes, such as SES, call functions that are stored in user
|
||
files. (@xref{Top, Simple Emacs Spreadsheet,,ses}, for more
|
||
information on SES@.) User files sometimes have poor pedigrees---you
|
||
can get a spreadsheet from someone you've just met, or you can get one
|
||
through email from someone you've never met. So it is risky to call a
|
||
function whose source code is stored in a user file until you have
|
||
determined that it is safe.
|
||
|
||
@defun unsafep form &optional unsafep-vars
|
||
Returns @code{nil} if @var{form} is a @dfn{safe} Lisp expression, or
|
||
returns a list that describes why it might be unsafe. The argument
|
||
@var{unsafep-vars} is a list of symbols known to have temporary
|
||
bindings at this point; it is mainly used for internal recursive
|
||
calls. The current buffer is an implicit argument, which provides a
|
||
list of buffer-local bindings.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
Being quick and simple, @code{unsafep} does a very light analysis and
|
||
rejects many Lisp expressions that are actually safe. There are no
|
||
known cases where @code{unsafep} returns @code{nil} for an unsafe
|
||
expression. However, a safe Lisp expression can return a string
|
||
with a @code{display} property, containing an associated Lisp
|
||
expression to be executed after the string is inserted into a buffer.
|
||
This associated expression can be a virus. In order to be safe, you
|
||
must delete properties from all strings calculated by user code before
|
||
inserting them into buffers.
|
||
|
||
@ignore
|
||
What is a safe Lisp expression? Basically, it's an expression that
|
||
calls only built-in functions with no side effects (or only innocuous
|
||
ones). Innocuous side effects include displaying messages and
|
||
altering non-risky buffer-local variables (but not global variables).
|
||
|
||
@table @dfn
|
||
@item Safe expression
|
||
@itemize
|
||
@item
|
||
An atom or quoted thing.
|
||
@item
|
||
A call to a safe function (see below), if all its arguments are
|
||
safe expressions.
|
||
@item
|
||
One of the special forms @code{and}, @code{catch}, @code{cond},
|
||
@code{if}, @code{or}, @code{prog1}, @code{prog2}, @code{progn},
|
||
@code{while}, and @code{unwind-protect}], if all its arguments are
|
||
safe.
|
||
@item
|
||
A form that creates temporary bindings (@code{condition-case},
|
||
@code{dolist}, @code{dotimes}, @code{lambda}, @code{let}, or
|
||
@code{let*}), if all args are safe and the symbols to be bound are not
|
||
explicitly risky (@pxref{File Local Variables}).
|
||
@item
|
||
An assignment using @code{add-to-list}, @code{setq}, @code{push}, or
|
||
@code{pop}, if all args are safe and the symbols to be assigned are
|
||
not explicitly risky and they already have temporary or buffer-local
|
||
bindings.
|
||
@item
|
||
One of [apply, mapc, mapcar, mapconcat] if the first argument is a
|
||
safe explicit lambda and the other args are safe expressions.
|
||
@end itemize
|
||
|
||
@item Safe function
|
||
@itemize
|
||
@item
|
||
A lambda containing safe expressions.
|
||
@item
|
||
A symbol on the list @code{safe-functions}, so the user says it's safe.
|
||
@item
|
||
A symbol with a non-@code{nil} @code{side-effect-free} property.
|
||
@item
|
||
A symbol with a non-@code{nil} @code{safe-function} property. The
|
||
value @code{t} indicates a function that is safe but has innocuous
|
||
side effects. Other values will someday indicate functions with
|
||
classes of side effects that are not always safe.
|
||
@end itemize
|
||
|
||
The @code{side-effect-free} and @code{safe-function} properties are
|
||
provided for built-in functions and for low-level functions and macros
|
||
defined in @file{subr.el}. You can assign these properties for the
|
||
functions you write.
|
||
@end table
|
||
@end ignore
|
||
|
||
@node Related Topics
|
||
@section Other Topics Related to Functions
|
||
|
||
Here is a table of several functions that do things related to
|
||
function calling and function definitions. They are documented
|
||
elsewhere, but we provide cross references here.
|
||
|
||
@table @code
|
||
@item apply
|
||
See @ref{Calling Functions}.
|
||
|
||
@item autoload
|
||
See @ref{Autoload}.
|
||
|
||
@item call-interactively
|
||
See @ref{Interactive Call}.
|
||
|
||
@item called-interactively-p
|
||
See @ref{Distinguish Interactive}.
|
||
|
||
@item commandp
|
||
See @ref{Interactive Call}.
|
||
|
||
@item documentation
|
||
See @ref{Accessing Documentation}.
|
||
|
||
@item eval
|
||
See @ref{Eval}.
|
||
|
||
@item funcall
|
||
See @ref{Calling Functions}.
|
||
|
||
@item function
|
||
See @ref{Anonymous Functions}.
|
||
|
||
@item ignore
|
||
See @ref{Calling Functions}.
|
||
|
||
@item indirect-function
|
||
See @ref{Function Indirection}.
|
||
|
||
@item interactive
|
||
See @ref{Using Interactive}.
|
||
|
||
@item interactive-p
|
||
See @ref{Distinguish Interactive}.
|
||
|
||
@item mapatoms
|
||
See @ref{Creating Symbols}.
|
||
|
||
@item mapcar
|
||
See @ref{Mapping Functions}.
|
||
|
||
@item map-char-table
|
||
See @ref{Char-Tables}.
|
||
|
||
@item mapconcat
|
||
See @ref{Mapping Functions}.
|
||
|
||
@item undefined
|
||
See @ref{Functions for Key Lookup}.
|
||
@end table
|