mirror of
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/emacs.git
synced 2024-11-24 07:20:37 +00:00
5badc81c1c
Run admin/update-copyright.
1684 lines
63 KiB
Plaintext
1684 lines
63 KiB
Plaintext
@c -*- mode: texinfo; coding: utf-8 -*-
|
||
@c This is part of the GNU Emacs Lisp Reference Manual.
|
||
@c Copyright (C) 1990-1995, 1998-1999, 2001-2017 Free Software
|
||
@c Foundation, Inc.
|
||
@c See the file elisp.texi for copying conditions.
|
||
@node Control Structures
|
||
@chapter Control Structures
|
||
@cindex special forms for control structures
|
||
@cindex control structures
|
||
|
||
A Lisp program consists of a set of @dfn{expressions}, or
|
||
@dfn{forms} (@pxref{Forms}). We control the order of execution of
|
||
these forms by enclosing them in @dfn{control structures}. Control
|
||
structures are special forms which control when, whether, or how many
|
||
times to execute the forms they contain.
|
||
|
||
@cindex textual order
|
||
The simplest order of execution is sequential execution: first form
|
||
@var{a}, then form @var{b}, and so on. This is what happens when you
|
||
write several forms in succession in the body of a function, or at top
|
||
level in a file of Lisp code---the forms are executed in the order
|
||
written. We call this @dfn{textual order}. For example, if a function
|
||
body consists of two forms @var{a} and @var{b}, evaluation of the
|
||
function evaluates first @var{a} and then @var{b}. The result of
|
||
evaluating @var{b} becomes the value of the function.
|
||
|
||
Explicit control structures make possible an order of execution other
|
||
than sequential.
|
||
|
||
Emacs Lisp provides several kinds of control structure, including
|
||
other varieties of sequencing, conditionals, iteration, and (controlled)
|
||
jumps---all discussed below. The built-in control structures are
|
||
special forms since their subforms are not necessarily evaluated or not
|
||
evaluated sequentially. You can use macros to define your own control
|
||
structure constructs (@pxref{Macros}).
|
||
|
||
@menu
|
||
* Sequencing:: Evaluation in textual order.
|
||
* Conditionals:: @code{if}, @code{cond}, @code{when}, @code{unless}.
|
||
* Combining Conditions:: @code{and}, @code{or}, @code{not}.
|
||
* Iteration:: @code{while} loops.
|
||
* Generators:: Generic sequences and coroutines.
|
||
* Nonlocal Exits:: Jumping out of a sequence.
|
||
@end menu
|
||
|
||
@node Sequencing
|
||
@section Sequencing
|
||
@cindex sequencing
|
||
@cindex sequential execution
|
||
|
||
Evaluating forms in the order they appear is the most common way
|
||
control passes from one form to another. In some contexts, such as in a
|
||
function body, this happens automatically. Elsewhere you must use a
|
||
control structure construct to do this: @code{progn}, the simplest
|
||
control construct of Lisp.
|
||
|
||
A @code{progn} special form looks like this:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(progn @var{a} @var{b} @var{c} @dots{})
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
and it says to execute the forms @var{a}, @var{b}, @var{c}, and so on, in
|
||
that order. These forms are called the @dfn{body} of the @code{progn} form.
|
||
The value of the last form in the body becomes the value of the entire
|
||
@code{progn}. @code{(progn)} returns @code{nil}.
|
||
|
||
@cindex implicit @code{progn}
|
||
In the early days of Lisp, @code{progn} was the only way to execute
|
||
two or more forms in succession and use the value of the last of them.
|
||
But programmers found they often needed to use a @code{progn} in the
|
||
body of a function, where (at that time) only one form was allowed. So
|
||
the body of a function was made into an implicit @code{progn}:
|
||
several forms are allowed just as in the body of an actual @code{progn}.
|
||
Many other control structures likewise contain an implicit @code{progn}.
|
||
As a result, @code{progn} is not used as much as it was many years ago.
|
||
It is needed now most often inside an @code{unwind-protect}, @code{and},
|
||
@code{or}, or in the @var{then}-part of an @code{if}.
|
||
|
||
@defspec progn forms@dots{}
|
||
This special form evaluates all of the @var{forms}, in textual
|
||
order, returning the result of the final form.
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(progn (print "The first form")
|
||
(print "The second form")
|
||
(print "The third form"))
|
||
@print{} "The first form"
|
||
@print{} "The second form"
|
||
@print{} "The third form"
|
||
@result{} "The third form"
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
@end defspec
|
||
|
||
Two other constructs likewise evaluate a series of forms but return
|
||
different values:
|
||
|
||
@defspec prog1 form1 forms@dots{}
|
||
This special form evaluates @var{form1} and all of the @var{forms}, in
|
||
textual order, returning the result of @var{form1}.
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(prog1 (print "The first form")
|
||
(print "The second form")
|
||
(print "The third form"))
|
||
@print{} "The first form"
|
||
@print{} "The second form"
|
||
@print{} "The third form"
|
||
@result{} "The first form"
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
Here is a way to remove the first element from a list in the variable
|
||
@code{x}, then return the value of that former element:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(prog1 (car x) (setq x (cdr x)))
|
||
@end example
|
||
@end defspec
|
||
|
||
@defspec prog2 form1 form2 forms@dots{}
|
||
This special form evaluates @var{form1}, @var{form2}, and all of the
|
||
following @var{forms}, in textual order, returning the result of
|
||
@var{form2}.
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(prog2 (print "The first form")
|
||
(print "The second form")
|
||
(print "The third form"))
|
||
@print{} "The first form"
|
||
@print{} "The second form"
|
||
@print{} "The third form"
|
||
@result{} "The second form"
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
@end defspec
|
||
|
||
@node Conditionals
|
||
@section Conditionals
|
||
@cindex conditional evaluation
|
||
|
||
Conditional control structures choose among alternatives. Emacs Lisp
|
||
has four conditional forms: @code{if}, which is much the same as in
|
||
other languages; @code{when} and @code{unless}, which are variants of
|
||
@code{if}; and @code{cond}, which is a generalized case statement.
|
||
|
||
@defspec if condition then-form else-forms@dots{}
|
||
@code{if} chooses between the @var{then-form} and the @var{else-forms}
|
||
based on the value of @var{condition}. If the evaluated @var{condition} is
|
||
non-@code{nil}, @var{then-form} is evaluated and the result returned.
|
||
Otherwise, the @var{else-forms} are evaluated in textual order, and the
|
||
value of the last one is returned. (The @var{else} part of @code{if} is
|
||
an example of an implicit @code{progn}. @xref{Sequencing}.)
|
||
|
||
If @var{condition} has the value @code{nil}, and no @var{else-forms} are
|
||
given, @code{if} returns @code{nil}.
|
||
|
||
@code{if} is a special form because the branch that is not selected is
|
||
never evaluated---it is ignored. Thus, in this example,
|
||
@code{true} is not printed because @code{print} is never called:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(if nil
|
||
(print 'true)
|
||
'very-false)
|
||
@result{} very-false
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
@end defspec
|
||
|
||
@defmac when condition then-forms@dots{}
|
||
This is a variant of @code{if} where there are no @var{else-forms},
|
||
and possibly several @var{then-forms}. In particular,
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(when @var{condition} @var{a} @var{b} @var{c})
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
is entirely equivalent to
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(if @var{condition} (progn @var{a} @var{b} @var{c}) nil)
|
||
@end example
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
@defmac unless condition forms@dots{}
|
||
This is a variant of @code{if} where there is no @var{then-form}:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(unless @var{condition} @var{a} @var{b} @var{c})
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
is entirely equivalent to
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(if @var{condition} nil
|
||
@var{a} @var{b} @var{c})
|
||
@end example
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
@defspec cond clause@dots{}
|
||
@code{cond} chooses among an arbitrary number of alternatives. Each
|
||
@var{clause} in the @code{cond} must be a list. The @sc{car} of this
|
||
list is the @var{condition}; the remaining elements, if any, the
|
||
@var{body-forms}. Thus, a clause looks like this:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(@var{condition} @var{body-forms}@dots{})
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@code{cond} tries the clauses in textual order, by evaluating the
|
||
@var{condition} of each clause. If the value of @var{condition} is
|
||
non-@code{nil}, the clause succeeds; then @code{cond} evaluates its
|
||
@var{body-forms}, and returns the value of the last of @var{body-forms}.
|
||
Any remaining clauses are ignored.
|
||
|
||
If the value of @var{condition} is @code{nil}, the clause fails, so
|
||
the @code{cond} moves on to the following clause, trying its @var{condition}.
|
||
|
||
A clause may also look like this:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(@var{condition})
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
Then, if @var{condition} is non-@code{nil} when tested, the @code{cond}
|
||
form returns the value of @var{condition}.
|
||
|
||
If every @var{condition} evaluates to @code{nil}, so that every clause
|
||
fails, @code{cond} returns @code{nil}.
|
||
|
||
The following example has four clauses, which test for the cases where
|
||
the value of @code{x} is a number, string, buffer and symbol,
|
||
respectively:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(cond ((numberp x) x)
|
||
((stringp x) x)
|
||
((bufferp x)
|
||
(setq temporary-hack x) ; @r{multiple body-forms}
|
||
(buffer-name x)) ; @r{in one clause}
|
||
((symbolp x) (symbol-value x)))
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
Often we want to execute the last clause whenever none of the previous
|
||
clauses was successful. To do this, we use @code{t} as the
|
||
@var{condition} of the last clause, like this: @code{(t
|
||
@var{body-forms})}. The form @code{t} evaluates to @code{t}, which is
|
||
never @code{nil}, so this clause never fails, provided the @code{cond}
|
||
gets to it at all. For example:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(setq a 5)
|
||
(cond ((eq a 'hack) 'foo)
|
||
(t "default"))
|
||
@result{} "default"
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
This @code{cond} expression returns @code{foo} if the value of @code{a}
|
||
is @code{hack}, and returns the string @code{"default"} otherwise.
|
||
@end defspec
|
||
|
||
Any conditional construct can be expressed with @code{cond} or with
|
||
@code{if}. Therefore, the choice between them is a matter of style.
|
||
For example:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(if @var{a} @var{b} @var{c})
|
||
@equiv{}
|
||
(cond (@var{a} @var{b}) (t @var{c}))
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@menu
|
||
* Pattern matching case statement::
|
||
@end menu
|
||
|
||
@node Pattern matching case statement
|
||
@subsection Pattern matching case statement
|
||
@cindex pcase
|
||
@cindex pattern matching
|
||
|
||
The @code{cond} form lets you choose between alternatives using
|
||
predicate conditions that compare values of expressions against
|
||
specific values known and written in advance. However, sometimes it
|
||
is useful to select alternatives based on more general conditions that
|
||
distinguish between broad classes of values. The @code{pcase} macro
|
||
allows you to choose between alternatives based on matching the value
|
||
of an expression against a series of patterns. A pattern can be a
|
||
literal value (for comparisons to literal values you'd use
|
||
@code{cond}), or it can be a more general description of the expected
|
||
structure of the expression's value.
|
||
|
||
@defmac pcase expression &rest clauses
|
||
Evaluate @var{expression} and choose among an arbitrary number of
|
||
alternatives based on the value of @var{expression}. The possible
|
||
alternatives are specified by @var{clauses}, each of which must be a
|
||
list of the form @code{(@var{pattern} @var{body-forms}@dots{})}.
|
||
@code{pcase} tries to match the value of @var{expression} to the
|
||
@var{pattern} of each clause, in textual order. If the value matches,
|
||
the clause succeeds; @code{pcase} then evaluates its @var{body-forms},
|
||
and returns the value of the last of @var{body-forms}. Any remaining
|
||
@var{clauses} are ignored.
|
||
|
||
The @var{pattern} part of a clause can be of one of two types:
|
||
@dfn{QPattern}, a pattern quoted with a backquote; or a
|
||
@dfn{UPattern}, which is not quoted. UPatterns are simpler, so we
|
||
describe them first.
|
||
|
||
Note: In the description of the patterns below, we use ``the value
|
||
being matched'' to refer to the value of the @var{expression} that is
|
||
the first argument of @code{pcase}.
|
||
|
||
A UPattern can have the following forms:
|
||
|
||
@table @code
|
||
|
||
@item '@var{val}
|
||
Matches if the value being matched is @code{equal} to @var{val}.
|
||
@item @var{atom}
|
||
Matches any @var{atom}, which can be a keyword, a number, or a string.
|
||
(These are self-quoting, so this kind of UPattern is actually a
|
||
shorthand for @code{'@var{atom}}.) Note that a string or a float
|
||
matches any string or float with the same contents/value.
|
||
@item _
|
||
Matches any value. This is known as @dfn{don't care} or @dfn{wildcard}.
|
||
@item @var{symbol}
|
||
Matches any value, and additionally let-binds @var{symbol} to the
|
||
value it matched, so that you can later refer to it, either in the
|
||
@var{body-forms} or also later in the pattern.
|
||
@item (pred @var{predfun})
|
||
Matches if the predicate function @var{predfun} returns non-@code{nil}
|
||
when called with the value being matched as its argument.
|
||
@var{predfun} can be one of the possible forms described below.
|
||
@item (guard @var{boolean-expression})
|
||
Matches if @var{boolean-expression} evaluates to non-@code{nil}. This
|
||
allows you to include in a UPattern boolean conditions that refer to
|
||
symbols bound to values (including the value being matched) by
|
||
previous UPatterns. Typically used inside an @code{and} UPattern, see
|
||
below. For example, @w{@code{(and x (guard (< x 10)))}} is a pattern
|
||
which matches any number smaller than 10 and let-binds the variable
|
||
@code{x} to that number.
|
||
@item (let @var{upattern} @var{expression})
|
||
Matches if the specified @var{expression} matches the specified
|
||
@var{upattern}. This allows matching a pattern against the value of
|
||
an @emph{arbitrary} expression, not just the expression that is the
|
||
first argument to @code{pcase}. (It is called @code{let} because
|
||
@var{upattern} can bind symbols to values using the @var{symbol}
|
||
UPattern. For example:
|
||
@w{@code{((or `(key . ,val) (let val 5)) val)}}.)
|
||
@item (app @var{function} @var{upattern})
|
||
Matches if @var{function} applied to the value being matched returns a
|
||
value that matches @var{upattern}. This is like the @code{pred}
|
||
UPattern, except that it tests the result against @var{upattern},
|
||
rather than against a boolean truth value. The @var{function} call can
|
||
use one of the forms described below.
|
||
@item (or @var{upattern1} @var{upattern2}@dots{})
|
||
Matches if one the argument UPatterns matches. As soon as the first
|
||
matching UPattern is found, the rest are not tested. For this reason,
|
||
if any of the UPatterns let-bind symbols to the matched value, they
|
||
should all bind the same symbols.
|
||
@item (and @var{upattern1} @var{upattern2}@dots{})
|
||
Matches if all the argument UPatterns match.
|
||
@end table
|
||
|
||
The function calls used in the @code{pred} and @code{app} UPatterns
|
||
can have one of the following forms:
|
||
|
||
@table @asis
|
||
@item function symbol, like @code{integerp}
|
||
In this case, the named function is applied to the value being
|
||
matched.
|
||
@item lambda-function @code{(lambda (@var{arg}) @var{body})}
|
||
In this case, the lambda-function is called with one argument, the
|
||
value being matched.
|
||
@item @code{(@var{func} @var{args}@dots{})}
|
||
This is a function call with @var{n} specified arguments; the function
|
||
is called with these @var{n} arguments and an additional @var{n}+1-th
|
||
argument that is the value being matched.
|
||
@end table
|
||
|
||
Here's an illustrative example of using UPatterns:
|
||
|
||
@c FIXME: This example should use every one of the UPatterns described
|
||
@c above at least once.
|
||
@example
|
||
(pcase (get-return-code x)
|
||
('success (message "Done!"))
|
||
('would-block (message "Sorry, can't do it now"))
|
||
('read-only (message "The shmliblick is read-only"))
|
||
('access-denied (message "You do not have the needed rights"))
|
||
(code (message "Unknown return code %S" code)))
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
In addition, you can use backquoted patterns that are more powerful.
|
||
They allow matching the value of the @var{expression} that is the
|
||
first argument of @code{pcase} against specifications of its
|
||
@emph{structure}. For example, you can specify that the value must be
|
||
a list of 2 elements whose first element is a specific string and the
|
||
second element is any value with a backquoted pattern like
|
||
@code{`("first" ,second-elem)}.
|
||
|
||
Backquoted patterns have the form @code{`@var{qpattern}} where
|
||
@var{qpattern} can have the following forms:
|
||
|
||
@table @code
|
||
@item (@var{qpattern1} . @var{qpattern2})
|
||
Matches if the value being matched is a cons cell whose @code{car}
|
||
matches @var{qpattern1} and whose @code{cdr} matches @var{qpattern2}.
|
||
This readily generalizes to backquoted lists as in
|
||
@w{@code{(@var{qpattern1} @var{qpattern2} @dots{})}}.
|
||
@item [@var{qpattern1} @var{qpattern2} @dots{} @var{qpatternm}]
|
||
Matches if the value being matched is a vector of length @var{m} whose
|
||
@code{0}..@code{(@var{m}-1)}th elements match @var{qpattern1},
|
||
@var{qpattern2} @dots{} @var{qpatternm}, respectively.
|
||
@item @var{atom}
|
||
Matches if corresponding element of the value being matched is
|
||
@code{equal} to the specified @var{atom}.
|
||
@item ,@var{upattern}
|
||
Matches if the corresponding element of the value being matched
|
||
matches the specified @var{upattern}.
|
||
@end table
|
||
|
||
Note that uses of QPatterns can be expressed using only UPatterns, as
|
||
QPatterns are implemented on top of UPatterns using
|
||
@code{pcase-defmacro}, described below. However, using QPatterns will
|
||
in many cases lead to a more readable code.
|
||
@c FIXME: There should be an example here showing how a 'pcase' that
|
||
@c uses QPatterns can be rewritten using UPatterns.
|
||
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
Here is an example of using @code{pcase} to implement a simple
|
||
interpreter for a little expression language (note that this example
|
||
requires lexical binding, @pxref{Lexical Binding}):
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(defun evaluate (exp env)
|
||
(pcase exp
|
||
(`(add ,x ,y) (+ (evaluate x env) (evaluate y env)))
|
||
(`(call ,fun ,arg) (funcall (evaluate fun env) (evaluate arg env)))
|
||
(`(fn ,arg ,body) (lambda (val)
|
||
(evaluate body (cons (cons arg val) env))))
|
||
((pred numberp) exp)
|
||
((pred symbolp) (cdr (assq exp env)))
|
||
(_ (error "Unknown expression %S" exp))))
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
Here @code{`(add ,x ,y)} is a pattern that checks that @code{exp} is a
|
||
three-element list starting with the literal symbol @code{add}, then
|
||
extracts the second and third elements and binds them to the variables
|
||
@code{x} and @code{y}. Then it evaluates @code{x} and @code{y} and
|
||
adds the results. The @code{call} and @code{fn} patterns similarly
|
||
implement two flavors of function calls. @code{(pred numberp)} is a
|
||
pattern that simply checks that @code{exp} is a number and if so,
|
||
evaluates it. @code{(pred symbolp)} matches symbols, and returns
|
||
their association. Finally, @code{_} is the catch-all pattern that
|
||
matches anything, so it's suitable for reporting syntax errors.
|
||
|
||
Here are some sample programs in this small language, including their
|
||
evaluation results:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(evaluate '(add 1 2) nil) ;=> 3
|
||
(evaluate '(add x y) '((x . 1) (y . 2))) ;=> 3
|
||
(evaluate '(call (fn x (add 1 x)) 2) nil) ;=> 3
|
||
(evaluate '(sub 1 2) nil) ;=> error
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
Additional UPatterns can be defined using the @code{pcase-defmacro}
|
||
macro.
|
||
|
||
@defmac pcase-defmacro name args &rest body
|
||
Define a new kind of UPattern for @code{pcase}. The new UPattern will
|
||
be invoked as @code{(@var{name} @var{actual-args})}. The @var{body}
|
||
should describe how to rewrite the UPattern @var{name} into some other
|
||
UPattern. The rewriting will be the result of evaluating @var{body}
|
||
in an environment where @var{args} are bound to @var{actual-args}.
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
@node Combining Conditions
|
||
@section Constructs for Combining Conditions
|
||
@cindex combining conditions
|
||
|
||
This section describes three constructs that are often used together
|
||
with @code{if} and @code{cond} to express complicated conditions. The
|
||
constructs @code{and} and @code{or} can also be used individually as
|
||
kinds of multiple conditional constructs.
|
||
|
||
@defun not condition
|
||
This function tests for the falsehood of @var{condition}. It returns
|
||
@code{t} if @var{condition} is @code{nil}, and @code{nil} otherwise.
|
||
The function @code{not} is identical to @code{null}, and we recommend
|
||
using the name @code{null} if you are testing for an empty list.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@defspec and conditions@dots{}
|
||
The @code{and} special form tests whether all the @var{conditions} are
|
||
true. It works by evaluating the @var{conditions} one by one in the
|
||
order written.
|
||
|
||
If any of the @var{conditions} evaluates to @code{nil}, then the result
|
||
of the @code{and} must be @code{nil} regardless of the remaining
|
||
@var{conditions}; so @code{and} returns @code{nil} right away, ignoring
|
||
the remaining @var{conditions}.
|
||
|
||
If all the @var{conditions} turn out non-@code{nil}, then the value of
|
||
the last of them becomes the value of the @code{and} form. Just
|
||
@code{(and)}, with no @var{conditions}, returns @code{t}, appropriate
|
||
because all the @var{conditions} turned out non-@code{nil}. (Think
|
||
about it; which one did not?)
|
||
|
||
Here is an example. The first condition returns the integer 1, which is
|
||
not @code{nil}. Similarly, the second condition returns the integer 2,
|
||
which is not @code{nil}. The third condition is @code{nil}, so the
|
||
remaining condition is never evaluated.
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(and (print 1) (print 2) nil (print 3))
|
||
@print{} 1
|
||
@print{} 2
|
||
@result{} nil
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
Here is a more realistic example of using @code{and}:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(if (and (consp foo) (eq (car foo) 'x))
|
||
(message "foo is a list starting with x"))
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
Note that @code{(car foo)} is not executed if @code{(consp foo)} returns
|
||
@code{nil}, thus avoiding an error.
|
||
|
||
@code{and} expressions can also be written using either @code{if} or
|
||
@code{cond}. Here's how:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(and @var{arg1} @var{arg2} @var{arg3})
|
||
@equiv{}
|
||
(if @var{arg1} (if @var{arg2} @var{arg3}))
|
||
@equiv{}
|
||
(cond (@var{arg1} (cond (@var{arg2} @var{arg3}))))
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
@end defspec
|
||
|
||
@defspec or conditions@dots{}
|
||
The @code{or} special form tests whether at least one of the
|
||
@var{conditions} is true. It works by evaluating all the
|
||
@var{conditions} one by one in the order written.
|
||
|
||
If any of the @var{conditions} evaluates to a non-@code{nil} value, then
|
||
the result of the @code{or} must be non-@code{nil}; so @code{or} returns
|
||
right away, ignoring the remaining @var{conditions}. The value it
|
||
returns is the non-@code{nil} value of the condition just evaluated.
|
||
|
||
If all the @var{conditions} turn out @code{nil}, then the @code{or}
|
||
expression returns @code{nil}. Just @code{(or)}, with no
|
||
@var{conditions}, returns @code{nil}, appropriate because all the
|
||
@var{conditions} turned out @code{nil}. (Think about it; which one
|
||
did not?)
|
||
|
||
For example, this expression tests whether @code{x} is either
|
||
@code{nil} or the integer zero:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(or (eq x nil) (eq x 0))
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
Like the @code{and} construct, @code{or} can be written in terms of
|
||
@code{cond}. For example:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(or @var{arg1} @var{arg2} @var{arg3})
|
||
@equiv{}
|
||
(cond (@var{arg1})
|
||
(@var{arg2})
|
||
(@var{arg3}))
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
You could almost write @code{or} in terms of @code{if}, but not quite:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(if @var{arg1} @var{arg1}
|
||
(if @var{arg2} @var{arg2}
|
||
@var{arg3}))
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
This is not completely equivalent because it can evaluate @var{arg1} or
|
||
@var{arg2} twice. By contrast, @code{(or @var{arg1} @var{arg2}
|
||
@var{arg3})} never evaluates any argument more than once.
|
||
@end defspec
|
||
|
||
@node Iteration
|
||
@section Iteration
|
||
@cindex iteration
|
||
@cindex recursion
|
||
|
||
Iteration means executing part of a program repetitively. For
|
||
example, you might want to repeat some computation once for each element
|
||
of a list, or once for each integer from 0 to @var{n}. You can do this
|
||
in Emacs Lisp with the special form @code{while}:
|
||
|
||
@defspec while condition forms@dots{}
|
||
@code{while} first evaluates @var{condition}. If the result is
|
||
non-@code{nil}, it evaluates @var{forms} in textual order. Then it
|
||
reevaluates @var{condition}, and if the result is non-@code{nil}, it
|
||
evaluates @var{forms} again. This process repeats until @var{condition}
|
||
evaluates to @code{nil}.
|
||
|
||
There is no limit on the number of iterations that may occur. The loop
|
||
will continue until either @var{condition} evaluates to @code{nil} or
|
||
until an error or @code{throw} jumps out of it (@pxref{Nonlocal Exits}).
|
||
|
||
The value of a @code{while} form is always @code{nil}.
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(setq num 0)
|
||
@result{} 0
|
||
@end group
|
||
@group
|
||
(while (< num 4)
|
||
(princ (format "Iteration %d." num))
|
||
(setq num (1+ num)))
|
||
@print{} Iteration 0.
|
||
@print{} Iteration 1.
|
||
@print{} Iteration 2.
|
||
@print{} Iteration 3.
|
||
@result{} nil
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
To write a repeat-until loop, which will execute something on each
|
||
iteration and then do the end-test, put the body followed by the
|
||
end-test in a @code{progn} as the first argument of @code{while}, as
|
||
shown here:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(while (progn
|
||
(forward-line 1)
|
||
(not (looking-at "^$"))))
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
This moves forward one line and continues moving by lines until it
|
||
reaches an empty line. It is peculiar in that the @code{while} has no
|
||
body, just the end test (which also does the real work of moving point).
|
||
@end defspec
|
||
|
||
The @code{dolist} and @code{dotimes} macros provide convenient ways to
|
||
write two common kinds of loops.
|
||
|
||
@defmac dolist (var list [result]) body@dots{}
|
||
This construct executes @var{body} once for each element of
|
||
@var{list}, binding the variable @var{var} locally to hold the current
|
||
element. Then it returns the value of evaluating @var{result}, or
|
||
@code{nil} if @var{result} is omitted. For example, here is how you
|
||
could use @code{dolist} to define the @code{reverse} function:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(defun reverse (list)
|
||
(let (value)
|
||
(dolist (elt list value)
|
||
(setq value (cons elt value)))))
|
||
@end example
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
@defmac dotimes (var count [result]) body@dots{}
|
||
This construct executes @var{body} once for each integer from 0
|
||
(inclusive) to @var{count} (exclusive), binding the variable @var{var}
|
||
to the integer for the current iteration. Then it returns the value
|
||
of evaluating @var{result}, or @code{nil} if @var{result} is omitted.
|
||
Here is an example of using @code{dotimes} to do something 100 times:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(dotimes (i 100)
|
||
(insert "I will not obey absurd orders\n"))
|
||
@end example
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
@node Generators
|
||
@section Generators
|
||
@cindex generators
|
||
|
||
A @dfn{generator} is a function that produces a potentially-infinite
|
||
stream of values. Each time the function produces a value, it
|
||
suspends itself and waits for a caller to request the next value.
|
||
|
||
@defmac iter-defun name args [doc] [declare] [interactive] body@dots{}
|
||
@code{iter-defun} defines a generator function. A generator function
|
||
has the same signature as a normal function, but works differently.
|
||
Instead of executing @var{body} when called, a generator function
|
||
returns an iterator object. That iterator runs @var{body} to generate
|
||
values, emitting a value and pausing where @code{iter-yield} or
|
||
@code{iter-yield-from} appears. When @var{body} returns normally,
|
||
@code{iter-next} signals @code{iter-end-of-sequence} with @var{body}'s
|
||
result as its condition data.
|
||
|
||
Any kind of Lisp code is valid inside @var{body}, but
|
||
@code{iter-yield} and @code{iter-yield-from} cannot appear inside
|
||
@code{unwind-protect} forms.
|
||
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
@defmac iter-lambda args [doc] [interactive] body@dots{}
|
||
@code{iter-lambda} produces an unnamed generator function that works
|
||
just like a generator function produced with @code{iter-defun}.
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
@defmac iter-yield value
|
||
When it appears inside a generator function, @code{iter-yield}
|
||
indicates that the current iterator should pause and return
|
||
@var{value} from @code{iter-next}. @code{iter-yield} evaluates to the
|
||
@code{value} parameter of next call to @code{iter-next}.
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
@defmac iter-yield-from iterator
|
||
@code{iter-yield-from} yields all the values that @var{iterator}
|
||
produces and evaluates to the value that @var{iterator}'s generator
|
||
function returns normally. While it has control, @var{iterator}
|
||
receives values sent to the iterator using @code{iter-next}.
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
To use a generator function, first call it normally, producing a
|
||
@dfn{iterator} object. An iterator is a specific instance of a
|
||
generator. Then use @code{iter-next} to retrieve values from this
|
||
iterator. When there are no more values to pull from an iterator,
|
||
@code{iter-next} raises an @code{iter-end-of-sequence} condition with
|
||
the iterator's final value.
|
||
|
||
It's important to note that generator function bodies only execute
|
||
inside calls to @code{iter-next}. A call to a function defined with
|
||
@code{iter-defun} produces an iterator; you must drive this
|
||
iterator with @code{iter-next} for anything interesting to happen.
|
||
Each call to a generator function produces a @emph{different}
|
||
iterator, each with its own state.
|
||
|
||
@defun iter-next iterator value
|
||
Retrieve the next value from @var{iterator}. If there are no more
|
||
values to be generated (because @var{iterator}'s generator function
|
||
returned), @code{iter-next} signals the @code{iter-end-of-sequence}
|
||
condition; the data value associated with this condition is the value
|
||
with which @var{iterator}'s generator function returned.
|
||
|
||
@var{value} is sent into the iterator and becomes the value to which
|
||
@code{iter-yield} evaluates. @var{value} is ignored for the first
|
||
@code{iter-next} call to a given iterator, since at the start of
|
||
@var{iterator}'s generator function, the generator function is not
|
||
evaluating any @code{iter-yield} form.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@defun iter-close iterator
|
||
If @var{iterator} is suspended inside an @code{unwind-protect}'s
|
||
@code{bodyform} and becomes unreachable, Emacs will eventually run
|
||
unwind handlers after a garbage collection pass. (Note that
|
||
@code{iter-yield} is illegal inside an @code{unwind-protect}'s
|
||
@code{unwindforms}.) To ensure that these handlers are run before
|
||
then, use @code{iter-close}.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
Some convenience functions are provided to make working with
|
||
iterators easier:
|
||
|
||
@defmac iter-do (var iterator) body @dots{}
|
||
Run @var{body} with @var{var} bound to each value that
|
||
@var{iterator} produces.
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
The Common Lisp loop facility also contains features for working with
|
||
iterators. See @xref{Loop Facility,,,cl,Common Lisp Extensions}.
|
||
|
||
The following piece of code demonstrates some important principles of
|
||
working with iterators.
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(require 'generator)
|
||
(iter-defun my-iter (x)
|
||
(iter-yield (1+ (iter-yield (1+ x))))
|
||
;; Return normally
|
||
-1)
|
||
|
||
(let* ((iter (my-iter 5))
|
||
(iter2 (my-iter 0)))
|
||
;; Prints 6
|
||
(print (iter-next iter))
|
||
;; Prints 9
|
||
(print (iter-next iter 8))
|
||
;; Prints 1; iter and iter2 have distinct states
|
||
(print (iter-next iter2 nil))
|
||
|
||
;; We expect the iter sequence to end now
|
||
(condition-case x
|
||
(iter-next iter)
|
||
(iter-end-of-sequence
|
||
;; Prints -1, which my-iter returned normally
|
||
(print (cdr x)))))
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@node Nonlocal Exits
|
||
@section Nonlocal Exits
|
||
@cindex nonlocal exits
|
||
|
||
A @dfn{nonlocal exit} is a transfer of control from one point in a
|
||
program to another remote point. Nonlocal exits can occur in Emacs Lisp
|
||
as a result of errors; you can also use them under explicit control.
|
||
Nonlocal exits unbind all variable bindings made by the constructs being
|
||
exited.
|
||
|
||
@menu
|
||
* Catch and Throw:: Nonlocal exits for the program's own purposes.
|
||
* Examples of Catch:: Showing how such nonlocal exits can be written.
|
||
* Errors:: How errors are signaled and handled.
|
||
* Cleanups:: Arranging to run a cleanup form if an error happens.
|
||
@end menu
|
||
|
||
@node Catch and Throw
|
||
@subsection Explicit Nonlocal Exits: @code{catch} and @code{throw}
|
||
|
||
Most control constructs affect only the flow of control within the
|
||
construct itself. The function @code{throw} is the exception to this
|
||
rule of normal program execution: it performs a nonlocal exit on
|
||
request. (There are other exceptions, but they are for error handling
|
||
only.) @code{throw} is used inside a @code{catch}, and jumps back to
|
||
that @code{catch}. For example:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(defun foo-outer ()
|
||
(catch 'foo
|
||
(foo-inner)))
|
||
|
||
(defun foo-inner ()
|
||
@dots{}
|
||
(if x
|
||
(throw 'foo t))
|
||
@dots{})
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
The @code{throw} form, if executed, transfers control straight back to
|
||
the corresponding @code{catch}, which returns immediately. The code
|
||
following the @code{throw} is not executed. The second argument of
|
||
@code{throw} is used as the return value of the @code{catch}.
|
||
|
||
The function @code{throw} finds the matching @code{catch} based on the
|
||
first argument: it searches for a @code{catch} whose first argument is
|
||
@code{eq} to the one specified in the @code{throw}. If there is more
|
||
than one applicable @code{catch}, the innermost one takes precedence.
|
||
Thus, in the above example, the @code{throw} specifies @code{foo}, and
|
||
the @code{catch} in @code{foo-outer} specifies the same symbol, so that
|
||
@code{catch} is the applicable one (assuming there is no other matching
|
||
@code{catch} in between).
|
||
|
||
Executing @code{throw} exits all Lisp constructs up to the matching
|
||
@code{catch}, including function calls. When binding constructs such
|
||
as @code{let} or function calls are exited in this way, the bindings
|
||
are unbound, just as they are when these constructs exit normally
|
||
(@pxref{Local Variables}). Likewise, @code{throw} restores the buffer
|
||
and position saved by @code{save-excursion} (@pxref{Excursions}), and
|
||
the narrowing status saved by @code{save-restriction}. It also runs
|
||
any cleanups established with the @code{unwind-protect} special form
|
||
when it exits that form (@pxref{Cleanups}).
|
||
|
||
The @code{throw} need not appear lexically within the @code{catch}
|
||
that it jumps to. It can equally well be called from another function
|
||
called within the @code{catch}. As long as the @code{throw} takes place
|
||
chronologically after entry to the @code{catch}, and chronologically
|
||
before exit from it, it has access to that @code{catch}. This is why
|
||
@code{throw} can be used in commands such as @code{exit-recursive-edit}
|
||
that throw back to the editor command loop (@pxref{Recursive Editing}).
|
||
|
||
@cindex CL note---only @code{throw} in Emacs
|
||
@quotation
|
||
@b{Common Lisp note:} Most other versions of Lisp, including Common Lisp,
|
||
have several ways of transferring control nonsequentially: @code{return},
|
||
@code{return-from}, and @code{go}, for example. Emacs Lisp has only
|
||
@code{throw}. The @file{cl-lib} library provides versions of some of
|
||
these. @xref{Blocks and Exits,,,cl,Common Lisp Extensions}.
|
||
@end quotation
|
||
|
||
@defspec catch tag body@dots{}
|
||
@cindex tag on run time stack
|
||
@code{catch} establishes a return point for the @code{throw} function.
|
||
The return point is distinguished from other such return points by
|
||
@var{tag}, which may be any Lisp object except @code{nil}. The argument
|
||
@var{tag} is evaluated normally before the return point is established.
|
||
|
||
With the return point in effect, @code{catch} evaluates the forms of the
|
||
@var{body} in textual order. If the forms execute normally (without
|
||
error or nonlocal exit) the value of the last body form is returned from
|
||
the @code{catch}.
|
||
|
||
If a @code{throw} is executed during the execution of @var{body},
|
||
specifying the same value @var{tag}, the @code{catch} form exits
|
||
immediately; the value it returns is whatever was specified as the
|
||
second argument of @code{throw}.
|
||
@end defspec
|
||
|
||
@defun throw tag value
|
||
The purpose of @code{throw} is to return from a return point previously
|
||
established with @code{catch}. The argument @var{tag} is used to choose
|
||
among the various existing return points; it must be @code{eq} to the value
|
||
specified in the @code{catch}. If multiple return points match @var{tag},
|
||
the innermost one is used.
|
||
|
||
The argument @var{value} is used as the value to return from that
|
||
@code{catch}.
|
||
|
||
@kindex no-catch
|
||
If no return point is in effect with tag @var{tag}, then a @code{no-catch}
|
||
error is signaled with data @code{(@var{tag} @var{value})}.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@node Examples of Catch
|
||
@subsection Examples of @code{catch} and @code{throw}
|
||
|
||
One way to use @code{catch} and @code{throw} is to exit from a doubly
|
||
nested loop. (In most languages, this would be done with a @code{goto}.)
|
||
Here we compute @code{(foo @var{i} @var{j})} for @var{i} and @var{j}
|
||
varying from 0 to 9:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(defun search-foo ()
|
||
(catch 'loop
|
||
(let ((i 0))
|
||
(while (< i 10)
|
||
(let ((j 0))
|
||
(while (< j 10)
|
||
(if (foo i j)
|
||
(throw 'loop (list i j)))
|
||
(setq j (1+ j))))
|
||
(setq i (1+ i))))))
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
If @code{foo} ever returns non-@code{nil}, we stop immediately and return a
|
||
list of @var{i} and @var{j}. If @code{foo} always returns @code{nil}, the
|
||
@code{catch} returns normally, and the value is @code{nil}, since that
|
||
is the result of the @code{while}.
|
||
|
||
Here are two tricky examples, slightly different, showing two
|
||
return points at once. First, two return points with the same tag,
|
||
@code{hack}:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(defun catch2 (tag)
|
||
(catch tag
|
||
(throw 'hack 'yes)))
|
||
@result{} catch2
|
||
@end group
|
||
|
||
@group
|
||
(catch 'hack
|
||
(print (catch2 'hack))
|
||
'no)
|
||
@print{} yes
|
||
@result{} no
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
Since both return points have tags that match the @code{throw}, it goes to
|
||
the inner one, the one established in @code{catch2}. Therefore,
|
||
@code{catch2} returns normally with value @code{yes}, and this value is
|
||
printed. Finally the second body form in the outer @code{catch}, which is
|
||
@code{'no}, is evaluated and returned from the outer @code{catch}.
|
||
|
||
Now let's change the argument given to @code{catch2}:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(catch 'hack
|
||
(print (catch2 'quux))
|
||
'no)
|
||
@result{} yes
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
We still have two return points, but this time only the outer one has
|
||
the tag @code{hack}; the inner one has the tag @code{quux} instead.
|
||
Therefore, @code{throw} makes the outer @code{catch} return the value
|
||
@code{yes}. The function @code{print} is never called, and the
|
||
body-form @code{'no} is never evaluated.
|
||
|
||
@node Errors
|
||
@subsection Errors
|
||
@cindex errors
|
||
|
||
When Emacs Lisp attempts to evaluate a form that, for some reason,
|
||
cannot be evaluated, it @dfn{signals} an @dfn{error}.
|
||
|
||
When an error is signaled, Emacs's default reaction is to print an
|
||
error message and terminate execution of the current command. This is
|
||
the right thing to do in most cases, such as if you type @kbd{C-f} at
|
||
the end of the buffer.
|
||
|
||
In complicated programs, simple termination may not be what you want.
|
||
For example, the program may have made temporary changes in data
|
||
structures, or created temporary buffers that should be deleted before
|
||
the program is finished. In such cases, you would use
|
||
@code{unwind-protect} to establish @dfn{cleanup expressions} to be
|
||
evaluated in case of error. (@xref{Cleanups}.) Occasionally, you may
|
||
wish the program to continue execution despite an error in a subroutine.
|
||
In these cases, you would use @code{condition-case} to establish
|
||
@dfn{error handlers} to recover control in case of error.
|
||
|
||
Resist the temptation to use error handling to transfer control from
|
||
one part of the program to another; use @code{catch} and @code{throw}
|
||
instead. @xref{Catch and Throw}.
|
||
|
||
@menu
|
||
* Signaling Errors:: How to report an error.
|
||
* Processing of Errors:: What Emacs does when you report an error.
|
||
* Handling Errors:: How you can trap errors and continue execution.
|
||
* Error Symbols:: How errors are classified for trapping them.
|
||
@end menu
|
||
|
||
@node Signaling Errors
|
||
@subsubsection How to Signal an Error
|
||
@cindex signaling errors
|
||
|
||
@dfn{Signaling} an error means beginning error processing. Error
|
||
processing normally aborts all or part of the running program and
|
||
returns to a point that is set up to handle the error
|
||
(@pxref{Processing of Errors}). Here we describe how to signal an
|
||
error.
|
||
|
||
Most errors are signaled automatically within Lisp primitives
|
||
which you call for other purposes, such as if you try to take the
|
||
@sc{car} of an integer or move forward a character at the end of the
|
||
buffer. You can also signal errors explicitly with the functions
|
||
@code{error} and @code{signal}.
|
||
|
||
Quitting, which happens when the user types @kbd{C-g}, is not
|
||
considered an error, but it is handled almost like an error.
|
||
@xref{Quitting}.
|
||
|
||
Every error specifies an error message, one way or another. The
|
||
message should state what is wrong (``File does not exist''), not how
|
||
things ought to be (``File must exist''). The convention in Emacs
|
||
Lisp is that error messages should start with a capital letter, but
|
||
should not end with any sort of punctuation.
|
||
|
||
@defun error format-string &rest args
|
||
This function signals an error with an error message constructed by
|
||
applying @code{format-message} (@pxref{Formatting Strings}) to
|
||
@var{format-string} and @var{args}.
|
||
|
||
These examples show typical uses of @code{error}:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(error "That is an error -- try something else")
|
||
@error{} That is an error -- try something else
|
||
@end group
|
||
|
||
@group
|
||
(error "Invalid name `%s'" "A%%B")
|
||
@error{} Invalid name ‘A%%B’
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@code{error} works by calling @code{signal} with two arguments: the
|
||
error symbol @code{error}, and a list containing the string returned by
|
||
@code{format-message}.
|
||
|
||
The @code{text-quoting-style} variable controls what quotes are
|
||
generated; @xref{Keys in Documentation}. A call using a format like
|
||
@t{"Missing `%s'"} with grave accents and apostrophes typically
|
||
generates a message like @t{"Missing ‘foo’"} with matching curved
|
||
quotes. In contrast, a call using a format like @t{"Missing '%s'"}
|
||
with only apostrophes typically generates a message like @t{"Missing
|
||
’foo’"} with only closing curved quotes, an unusual style in English.
|
||
|
||
@strong{Warning:} If you want to use your own string as an error message
|
||
verbatim, don't just write @code{(error @var{string})}. If @var{string}
|
||
@var{string} contains @samp{%}, @samp{`}, or @samp{'} it may be
|
||
reformatted, with undesirable results. Instead, use @code{(error "%s"
|
||
@var{string})}.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@defun signal error-symbol data
|
||
@anchor{Definition of signal}
|
||
This function signals an error named by @var{error-symbol}. The
|
||
argument @var{data} is a list of additional Lisp objects relevant to
|
||
the circumstances of the error.
|
||
|
||
The argument @var{error-symbol} must be an @dfn{error symbol}---a symbol
|
||
defined with @code{define-error}. This is how Emacs Lisp classifies different
|
||
sorts of errors. @xref{Error Symbols}, for a description of error symbols,
|
||
error conditions and condition names.
|
||
|
||
If the error is not handled, the two arguments are used in printing
|
||
the error message. Normally, this error message is provided by the
|
||
@code{error-message} property of @var{error-symbol}. If @var{data} is
|
||
non-@code{nil}, this is followed by a colon and a comma separated list
|
||
of the unevaluated elements of @var{data}. For @code{error}, the
|
||
error message is the @sc{car} of @var{data} (that must be a string).
|
||
Subcategories of @code{file-error} are handled specially.
|
||
|
||
The number and significance of the objects in @var{data} depends on
|
||
@var{error-symbol}. For example, with a @code{wrong-type-argument} error,
|
||
there should be two objects in the list: a predicate that describes the type
|
||
that was expected, and the object that failed to fit that type.
|
||
|
||
Both @var{error-symbol} and @var{data} are available to any error
|
||
handlers that handle the error: @code{condition-case} binds a local
|
||
variable to a list of the form @code{(@var{error-symbol} .@:
|
||
@var{data})} (@pxref{Handling Errors}).
|
||
|
||
The function @code{signal} never returns.
|
||
@c (though in older Emacs versions it sometimes could).
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(signal 'wrong-number-of-arguments '(x y))
|
||
@error{} Wrong number of arguments: x, y
|
||
@end group
|
||
|
||
@group
|
||
(signal 'no-such-error '("My unknown error condition"))
|
||
@error{} peculiar error: "My unknown error condition"
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@cindex user errors, signaling
|
||
@defun user-error format-string &rest args
|
||
This function behaves exactly like @code{error}, except that it uses
|
||
the error symbol @code{user-error} rather than @code{error}. As the
|
||
name suggests, this is intended to report errors on the part of the
|
||
user, rather than errors in the code itself. For example,
|
||
if you try to use the command @code{Info-history-back} (@kbd{l}) to
|
||
move back beyond the start of your Info browsing history, Emacs
|
||
signals a @code{user-error}. Such errors do not cause entry to the
|
||
debugger, even when @code{debug-on-error} is non-@code{nil}.
|
||
@xref{Error Debugging}.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@cindex CL note---no continuable errors
|
||
@quotation
|
||
@b{Common Lisp note:} Emacs Lisp has nothing like the Common Lisp
|
||
concept of continuable errors.
|
||
@end quotation
|
||
|
||
@node Processing of Errors
|
||
@subsubsection How Emacs Processes Errors
|
||
@cindex processing of errors
|
||
|
||
When an error is signaled, @code{signal} searches for an active
|
||
@dfn{handler} for the error. A handler is a sequence of Lisp
|
||
expressions designated to be executed if an error happens in part of the
|
||
Lisp program. If the error has an applicable handler, the handler is
|
||
executed, and control resumes following the handler. The handler
|
||
executes in the environment of the @code{condition-case} that
|
||
established it; all functions called within that @code{condition-case}
|
||
have already been exited, and the handler cannot return to them.
|
||
|
||
If there is no applicable handler for the error, it terminates the
|
||
current command and returns control to the editor command loop. (The
|
||
command loop has an implicit handler for all kinds of errors.) The
|
||
command loop's handler uses the error symbol and associated data to
|
||
print an error message. You can use the variable
|
||
@code{command-error-function} to control how this is done:
|
||
|
||
@defvar command-error-function
|
||
This variable, if non-@code{nil}, specifies a function to use to
|
||
handle errors that return control to the Emacs command loop. The
|
||
function should take three arguments: @var{data}, a list of the same
|
||
form that @code{condition-case} would bind to its variable;
|
||
@var{context}, a string describing the situation in which the error
|
||
occurred, or (more often) @code{nil}; and @var{caller}, the Lisp
|
||
function which called the primitive that signaled the error.
|
||
@end defvar
|
||
|
||
@cindex @code{debug-on-error} use
|
||
An error that has no explicit handler may call the Lisp debugger. The
|
||
debugger is enabled if the variable @code{debug-on-error} (@pxref{Error
|
||
Debugging}) is non-@code{nil}. Unlike error handlers, the debugger runs
|
||
in the environment of the error, so that you can examine values of
|
||
variables precisely as they were at the time of the error.
|
||
|
||
@node Handling Errors
|
||
@subsubsection Writing Code to Handle Errors
|
||
@cindex error handler
|
||
@cindex handling errors
|
||
|
||
The usual effect of signaling an error is to terminate the command
|
||
that is running and return immediately to the Emacs editor command loop.
|
||
You can arrange to trap errors occurring in a part of your program by
|
||
establishing an error handler, with the special form
|
||
@code{condition-case}. A simple example looks like this:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(condition-case nil
|
||
(delete-file filename)
|
||
(error nil))
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
This deletes the file named @var{filename}, catching any error and
|
||
returning @code{nil} if an error occurs. (You can use the macro
|
||
@code{ignore-errors} for a simple case like this; see below.)
|
||
|
||
The @code{condition-case} construct is often used to trap errors that
|
||
are predictable, such as failure to open a file in a call to
|
||
@code{insert-file-contents}. It is also used to trap errors that are
|
||
totally unpredictable, such as when the program evaluates an expression
|
||
read from the user.
|
||
|
||
The second argument of @code{condition-case} is called the
|
||
@dfn{protected form}. (In the example above, the protected form is a
|
||
call to @code{delete-file}.) The error handlers go into effect when
|
||
this form begins execution and are deactivated when this form returns.
|
||
They remain in effect for all the intervening time. In particular, they
|
||
are in effect during the execution of functions called by this form, in
|
||
their subroutines, and so on. This is a good thing, since, strictly
|
||
speaking, errors can be signaled only by Lisp primitives (including
|
||
@code{signal} and @code{error}) called by the protected form, not by the
|
||
protected form itself.
|
||
|
||
The arguments after the protected form are handlers. Each handler
|
||
lists one or more @dfn{condition names} (which are symbols) to specify
|
||
which errors it will handle. The error symbol specified when an error
|
||
is signaled also defines a list of condition names. A handler applies
|
||
to an error if they have any condition names in common. In the example
|
||
above, there is one handler, and it specifies one condition name,
|
||
@code{error}, which covers all errors.
|
||
|
||
The search for an applicable handler checks all the established handlers
|
||
starting with the most recently established one. Thus, if two nested
|
||
@code{condition-case} forms offer to handle the same error, the inner of
|
||
the two gets to handle it.
|
||
|
||
If an error is handled by some @code{condition-case} form, this
|
||
ordinarily prevents the debugger from being run, even if
|
||
@code{debug-on-error} says this error should invoke the debugger.
|
||
|
||
If you want to be able to debug errors that are caught by a
|
||
@code{condition-case}, set the variable @code{debug-on-signal} to a
|
||
non-@code{nil} value. You can also specify that a particular handler
|
||
should let the debugger run first, by writing @code{debug} among the
|
||
conditions, like this:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(condition-case nil
|
||
(delete-file filename)
|
||
((debug error) nil))
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
The effect of @code{debug} here is only to prevent
|
||
@code{condition-case} from suppressing the call to the debugger. Any
|
||
given error will invoke the debugger only if @code{debug-on-error} and
|
||
the other usual filtering mechanisms say it should. @xref{Error Debugging}.
|
||
|
||
@defmac condition-case-unless-debug var protected-form handlers@dots{}
|
||
The macro @code{condition-case-unless-debug} provides another way to
|
||
handle debugging of such forms. It behaves exactly like
|
||
@code{condition-case}, unless the variable @code{debug-on-error} is
|
||
non-@code{nil}, in which case it does not handle any errors at all.
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
Once Emacs decides that a certain handler handles the error, it
|
||
returns control to that handler. To do so, Emacs unbinds all variable
|
||
bindings made by binding constructs that are being exited, and
|
||
executes the cleanups of all @code{unwind-protect} forms that are
|
||
being exited. Once control arrives at the handler, the body of the
|
||
handler executes normally.
|
||
|
||
After execution of the handler body, execution returns from the
|
||
@code{condition-case} form. Because the protected form is exited
|
||
completely before execution of the handler, the handler cannot resume
|
||
execution at the point of the error, nor can it examine variable
|
||
bindings that were made within the protected form. All it can do is
|
||
clean up and proceed.
|
||
|
||
Error signaling and handling have some resemblance to @code{throw} and
|
||
@code{catch} (@pxref{Catch and Throw}), but they are entirely separate
|
||
facilities. An error cannot be caught by a @code{catch}, and a
|
||
@code{throw} cannot be handled by an error handler (though using
|
||
@code{throw} when there is no suitable @code{catch} signals an error
|
||
that can be handled).
|
||
|
||
@defspec condition-case var protected-form handlers@dots{}
|
||
This special form establishes the error handlers @var{handlers} around
|
||
the execution of @var{protected-form}. If @var{protected-form} executes
|
||
without error, the value it returns becomes the value of the
|
||
@code{condition-case} form; in this case, the @code{condition-case} has
|
||
no effect. The @code{condition-case} form makes a difference when an
|
||
error occurs during @var{protected-form}.
|
||
|
||
Each of the @var{handlers} is a list of the form @code{(@var{conditions}
|
||
@var{body}@dots{})}. Here @var{conditions} is an error condition name
|
||
to be handled, or a list of condition names (which can include @code{debug}
|
||
to allow the debugger to run before the handler); @var{body} is one or more
|
||
Lisp expressions to be executed when this handler handles an error.
|
||
Here are examples of handlers:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(error nil)
|
||
|
||
(arith-error (message "Division by zero"))
|
||
|
||
((arith-error file-error)
|
||
(message
|
||
"Either division by zero or failure to open a file"))
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
Each error that occurs has an @dfn{error symbol} that describes what
|
||
kind of error it is, and which describes also a list of condition names
|
||
(@pxref{Error Symbols}). Emacs
|
||
searches all the active @code{condition-case} forms for a handler that
|
||
specifies one or more of these condition names; the innermost matching
|
||
@code{condition-case} handles the error. Within this
|
||
@code{condition-case}, the first applicable handler handles the error.
|
||
|
||
After executing the body of the handler, the @code{condition-case}
|
||
returns normally, using the value of the last form in the handler body
|
||
as the overall value.
|
||
|
||
@cindex error description
|
||
The argument @var{var} is a variable. @code{condition-case} does not
|
||
bind this variable when executing the @var{protected-form}, only when it
|
||
handles an error. At that time, it binds @var{var} locally to an
|
||
@dfn{error description}, which is a list giving the particulars of the
|
||
error. The error description has the form @code{(@var{error-symbol}
|
||
. @var{data})}. The handler can refer to this list to decide what to
|
||
do. For example, if the error is for failure opening a file, the file
|
||
name is the second element of @var{data}---the third element of the
|
||
error description.
|
||
|
||
If @var{var} is @code{nil}, that means no variable is bound. Then the
|
||
error symbol and associated data are not available to the handler.
|
||
|
||
@cindex rethrow a signal
|
||
Sometimes it is necessary to re-throw a signal caught by
|
||
@code{condition-case}, for some outer-level handler to catch. Here's
|
||
how to do that:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
(signal (car err) (cdr err))
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
where @code{err} is the error description variable, the first argument
|
||
to @code{condition-case} whose error condition you want to re-throw.
|
||
@xref{Definition of signal}.
|
||
@end defspec
|
||
|
||
@defun error-message-string error-descriptor
|
||
This function returns the error message string for a given error
|
||
descriptor. It is useful if you want to handle an error by printing the
|
||
usual error message for that error. @xref{Definition of signal}.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@cindex @code{arith-error} example
|
||
Here is an example of using @code{condition-case} to handle the error
|
||
that results from dividing by zero. The handler displays the error
|
||
message (but without a beep), then returns a very large number.
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(defun safe-divide (dividend divisor)
|
||
(condition-case err
|
||
;; @r{Protected form.}
|
||
(/ dividend divisor)
|
||
@end group
|
||
@group
|
||
;; @r{The handler.}
|
||
(arith-error ; @r{Condition.}
|
||
;; @r{Display the usual message for this error.}
|
||
(message "%s" (error-message-string err))
|
||
1000000)))
|
||
@result{} safe-divide
|
||
@end group
|
||
|
||
@group
|
||
(safe-divide 5 0)
|
||
@print{} Arithmetic error: (arith-error)
|
||
@result{} 1000000
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
The handler specifies condition name @code{arith-error} so that it
|
||
will handle only division-by-zero errors. Other kinds of errors will
|
||
not be handled (by this @code{condition-case}). Thus:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(safe-divide nil 3)
|
||
@error{} Wrong type argument: number-or-marker-p, nil
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
Here is a @code{condition-case} that catches all kinds of errors,
|
||
including those from @code{error}:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(setq baz 34)
|
||
@result{} 34
|
||
@end group
|
||
|
||
@group
|
||
(condition-case err
|
||
(if (eq baz 35)
|
||
t
|
||
;; @r{This is a call to the function @code{error}.}
|
||
(error "Rats! The variable %s was %s, not 35" 'baz baz))
|
||
;; @r{This is the handler; it is not a form.}
|
||
(error (princ (format "The error was: %s" err))
|
||
2))
|
||
@print{} The error was: (error "Rats! The variable baz was 34, not 35")
|
||
@result{} 2
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@defmac ignore-errors body@dots{}
|
||
This construct executes @var{body}, ignoring any errors that occur
|
||
during its execution. If the execution is without error,
|
||
@code{ignore-errors} returns the value of the last form in @var{body};
|
||
otherwise, it returns @code{nil}.
|
||
|
||
Here's the example at the beginning of this subsection rewritten using
|
||
@code{ignore-errors}:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(ignore-errors
|
||
(delete-file filename))
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
@defmac with-demoted-errors format body@dots{}
|
||
This macro is like a milder version of @code{ignore-errors}. Rather
|
||
than suppressing errors altogether, it converts them into messages.
|
||
It uses the string @var{format} to format the message.
|
||
@var{format} should contain a single @samp{%}-sequence; e.g.,
|
||
@code{"Error: %S"}. Use @code{with-demoted-errors} around code
|
||
that is not expected to signal errors, but
|
||
should be robust if one does occur. Note that this macro uses
|
||
@code{condition-case-unless-debug} rather than @code{condition-case}.
|
||
@end defmac
|
||
|
||
@node Error Symbols
|
||
@subsubsection Error Symbols and Condition Names
|
||
@cindex error symbol
|
||
@cindex error name
|
||
@cindex condition name
|
||
@cindex user-defined error
|
||
@kindex error-conditions
|
||
@kindex define-error
|
||
|
||
When you signal an error, you specify an @dfn{error symbol} to specify
|
||
the kind of error you have in mind. Each error has one and only one
|
||
error symbol to categorize it. This is the finest classification of
|
||
errors defined by the Emacs Lisp language.
|
||
|
||
These narrow classifications are grouped into a hierarchy of wider
|
||
classes called @dfn{error conditions}, identified by @dfn{condition
|
||
names}. The narrowest such classes belong to the error symbols
|
||
themselves: each error symbol is also a condition name. There are also
|
||
condition names for more extensive classes, up to the condition name
|
||
@code{error} which takes in all kinds of errors (but not @code{quit}).
|
||
Thus, each error has one or more condition names: @code{error}, the
|
||
error symbol if that is distinct from @code{error}, and perhaps some
|
||
intermediate classifications.
|
||
|
||
@defun define-error name message &optional parent
|
||
In order for a symbol to be an error symbol, it must be defined with
|
||
@code{define-error} which takes a parent condition (defaults to @code{error}).
|
||
This parent defines the conditions that this kind of error belongs to.
|
||
The transitive set of parents always includes the error symbol itself, and the
|
||
symbol @code{error}. Because quitting is not considered an error, the set of
|
||
parents of @code{quit} is just @code{(quit)}.
|
||
@end defun
|
||
|
||
@cindex peculiar error
|
||
In addition to its parents, the error symbol has a @var{message} which
|
||
is a string to be printed when that error is signaled but not handled. If that
|
||
message is not valid, the error message @samp{peculiar error} is used.
|
||
@xref{Definition of signal}.
|
||
|
||
Internally, the set of parents is stored in the @code{error-conditions}
|
||
property of the error symbol and the message is stored in the
|
||
@code{error-message} property of the error symbol.
|
||
|
||
Here is how we define a new error symbol, @code{new-error}:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(define-error 'new-error "A new error" 'my-own-errors)
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
This error has several condition names: @code{new-error}, the narrowest
|
||
classification; @code{my-own-errors}, which we imagine is a wider
|
||
classification; and all the conditions of @code{my-own-errors} which should
|
||
include @code{error}, which is the widest of all.
|
||
|
||
The error string should start with a capital letter but it should
|
||
not end with a period. This is for consistency with the rest of Emacs.
|
||
|
||
Naturally, Emacs will never signal @code{new-error} on its own; only
|
||
an explicit call to @code{signal} (@pxref{Definition of signal}) in
|
||
your code can do this:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(signal 'new-error '(x y))
|
||
@error{} A new error: x, y
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
This error can be handled through any of its condition names.
|
||
This example handles @code{new-error} and any other errors in the class
|
||
@code{my-own-errors}:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(condition-case foo
|
||
(bar nil t)
|
||
(my-own-errors nil))
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
The significant way that errors are classified is by their condition
|
||
names---the names used to match errors with handlers. An error symbol
|
||
serves only as a convenient way to specify the intended error message
|
||
and list of condition names. It would be cumbersome to give
|
||
@code{signal} a list of condition names rather than one error symbol.
|
||
|
||
By contrast, using only error symbols without condition names would
|
||
seriously decrease the power of @code{condition-case}. Condition names
|
||
make it possible to categorize errors at various levels of generality
|
||
when you write an error handler. Using error symbols alone would
|
||
eliminate all but the narrowest level of classification.
|
||
|
||
@xref{Standard Errors}, for a list of the main error symbols
|
||
and their conditions.
|
||
|
||
@node Cleanups
|
||
@subsection Cleaning Up from Nonlocal Exits
|
||
@cindex nonlocal exits, cleaning up
|
||
|
||
The @code{unwind-protect} construct is essential whenever you
|
||
temporarily put a data structure in an inconsistent state; it permits
|
||
you to make the data consistent again in the event of an error or
|
||
throw. (Another more specific cleanup construct that is used only for
|
||
changes in buffer contents is the atomic change group; @ref{Atomic
|
||
Changes}.)
|
||
|
||
@defspec unwind-protect body-form cleanup-forms@dots{}
|
||
@cindex cleanup forms
|
||
@cindex protected forms
|
||
@cindex error cleanup
|
||
@cindex unwinding
|
||
@code{unwind-protect} executes @var{body-form} with a guarantee that
|
||
the @var{cleanup-forms} will be evaluated if control leaves
|
||
@var{body-form}, no matter how that happens. @var{body-form} may
|
||
complete normally, or execute a @code{throw} out of the
|
||
@code{unwind-protect}, or cause an error; in all cases, the
|
||
@var{cleanup-forms} will be evaluated.
|
||
|
||
If @var{body-form} finishes normally, @code{unwind-protect} returns the
|
||
value of @var{body-form}, after it evaluates the @var{cleanup-forms}.
|
||
If @var{body-form} does not finish, @code{unwind-protect} does not
|
||
return any value in the normal sense.
|
||
|
||
Only @var{body-form} is protected by the @code{unwind-protect}. If any
|
||
of the @var{cleanup-forms} themselves exits nonlocally (via a
|
||
@code{throw} or an error), @code{unwind-protect} is @emph{not}
|
||
guaranteed to evaluate the rest of them. If the failure of one of the
|
||
@var{cleanup-forms} has the potential to cause trouble, then protect
|
||
it with another @code{unwind-protect} around that form.
|
||
|
||
The number of currently active @code{unwind-protect} forms counts,
|
||
together with the number of local variable bindings, against the limit
|
||
@code{max-specpdl-size} (@pxref{Definition of max-specpdl-size,, Local
|
||
Variables}).
|
||
@end defspec
|
||
|
||
For example, here we make an invisible buffer for temporary use, and
|
||
make sure to kill it before finishing:
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(let ((buffer (get-buffer-create " *temp*")))
|
||
(with-current-buffer buffer
|
||
(unwind-protect
|
||
@var{body-form}
|
||
(kill-buffer buffer))))
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
@noindent
|
||
You might think that we could just as well write @code{(kill-buffer
|
||
(current-buffer))} and dispense with the variable @code{buffer}.
|
||
However, the way shown above is safer, if @var{body-form} happens to
|
||
get an error after switching to a different buffer! (Alternatively,
|
||
you could write a @code{save-current-buffer} around @var{body-form},
|
||
to ensure that the temporary buffer becomes current again in time to
|
||
kill it.)
|
||
|
||
Emacs includes a standard macro called @code{with-temp-buffer} which
|
||
expands into more or less the code shown above (@pxref{Definition of
|
||
with-temp-buffer,, Current Buffer}). Several of the macros defined in
|
||
this manual use @code{unwind-protect} in this way.
|
||
|
||
@findex ftp-login
|
||
Here is an actual example derived from an FTP package. It creates a
|
||
process (@pxref{Processes}) to try to establish a connection to a remote
|
||
machine. As the function @code{ftp-login} is highly susceptible to
|
||
numerous problems that the writer of the function cannot anticipate, it
|
||
is protected with a form that guarantees deletion of the process in the
|
||
event of failure. Otherwise, Emacs might fill up with useless
|
||
subprocesses.
|
||
|
||
@example
|
||
@group
|
||
(let ((win nil))
|
||
(unwind-protect
|
||
(progn
|
||
(setq process (ftp-setup-buffer host file))
|
||
(if (setq win (ftp-login process host user password))
|
||
(message "Logged in")
|
||
(error "Ftp login failed")))
|
||
(or win (and process (delete-process process)))))
|
||
@end group
|
||
@end example
|
||
|
||
This example has a small bug: if the user types @kbd{C-g} to
|
||
quit, and the quit happens immediately after the function
|
||
@code{ftp-setup-buffer} returns but before the variable @code{process} is
|
||
set, the process will not be killed. There is no easy way to fix this bug,
|
||
but at least it is very unlikely.
|