mirror/freebsd-ports
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.FreeBSD.org/ports.git synced 2024-11-28 01:06:17 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Activity
285,239 Commits 45 Branches 100 Tags 3.3 GiB
0cffb26844
Commit Graph

15 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Baptiste Daroussin
0c48cd20b0 Mark as broken: it overwrites files owned by one of its dependencies 
pkgng says:
hugelatex-1.0_5 conflicts with teTeX-base-3.0_22 (installs files into the same place).  Problematic file: /usr/local/share/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf

Reported by:	pointyhat (pkgng exp-run)
Feature safe:	yes
 2012-04-02 10:20:06 +00:00
Max Brazhnikov
630ca2285f Bump PORTREVISION after open-mofit update 2011-05-02 12:44:53 +00:00
Dirk Meyer
de78af3ac5 - update to 1.4.1 
Reviewed by:	exp8 run on pointyhat
Supported by:	miwi
 2010-03-28 06:47:48 +00:00
Dirk Meyer
ca9c60461c - update to jpeg-8 2010-02-05 11:46:55 +00:00
Dirk Meyer
eca78ec61b - bump all port that indirectly depends on libjpeg and have not yet been bumped or updated 
Requested by:	edwin
 2009-07-31 13:57:52 +00:00
Florent Thoumie
d4f0d0048a - Welcome X.org 7.2 \o/. 
- Set X11BASE to ${LOCALBASE} for recent ${OSVERSION}.
- Bump PORTREVISION for ports intalling files in ${X11BASE}.
 2007-05-19 20:36:56 +00:00
Edwin Groothuis
d8e816e1a2 In post-install, remove log files[*] generated during the installation phase. 
[*] after discussions on irc about what the .fmt files are.
 2005-11-04 00:55:50 +00:00
Mark Linimon
f27235b06d Reset maintainer at his request. From the email: 
It is not clear to me if it is a needed port anyway, so I'd be skeptical
  of patches that "fix it".  It may be obviated completely by more recent
  teTeX distributions.
 2005-09-19 15:27:13 +00:00
Kris Kennaway
0d8f47d8f7 This port is scheduled for deletion on 2005-09-22 if it is still broken 
at that time and no PRs have been submitted to fix it.
 2005-07-23 02:53:43 +00:00
Kris Kennaway
ff4f59306e BROKEN: Incomplete pkg-plist 
Approved by:    portmgr (self)
 2005-03-26 19:51:38 +00:00
Mark Linimon
028b345bc3 Fix PLIST and unbreak. Note, however, Murray's email to me: 
I'm not sure that my original goals for hugelatex even make sense any
  more, and that the port is still needed. Does it properly work with
  larger documents that the default won't work with? [If not,] the port
  should simply be removed.

I don't know enough about LaTeX to know that answer to that one.  Could
LaTeX users weigh in on this?

PR:		ports/50094, ports/51837
Submitted by:	Volker Stolz, Alex Dupre
Approved by:	murray (maintainer)
 2003-10-16 21:59:50 +00:00
Kris Kennaway
87e38510be BROKEN: Bad pkg-plist 2003-05-06 07:18:02 +00:00
Ade Lovett
7e52725f2a Clear moonlight beckons. 
Requiem mors pacem pkg-comment,
And be calm ports tree.

E Nomini Patri, E Fili, E Spiritu Sancti.
 2003-03-07 06:14:21 +00:00
Akinori MUSHA
897d06aa97 Use ${ECHO_CMD} instead of ${ECHO} where you mean the echo command; 
the ECHO macro is set to "echo" by default, but it is set to "true" if
make(1) is invoked with the -s option while ECHO_CMD is always set to
the echo command.
 2002-01-29 11:48:57 +00:00
Murray Stokely
cc453cdb5c Add hugelatex, a meta-port for teTeX that builds a version of latex 
with higher default limits.

Obtained from:	NetBSD
 2001-09-08 01:06:06 +00:00