the latter has been removed, it's time to remove this port, too. Moreover,
a thourough look revealed that Linux::Pid has actually never been invoked
from Apache::SizeLimit.
Image zoom gives you complete control of the size of most images displayed in
mozilla based software. Both individual images or whole pages of images can be
zoomed.
WWW: http://imagezoom.yellowgorilla.net/
russian/xpi-imagezoom is obsolete now that www/xpi-imagezoom comes with russian
locale bundled.
PR: ports/101584
Submitted by: Alexander V. Ribchansky <triosoft@triosoft.com.ua>
- Add entry about viewcvs->viewvc
- Fix last entry. s|ports/sysutils/e17-module|sysutils/e17-module| [1]
Pointy hat to: itectu [1]
* devel/viewcvs
- Remove port
* net-mgmt/rancid
- Change to devel/viewvc in pkg-message
- Update to version 0.9.4
- Remove OpenSSL knob as the port requires it now
- Register CONFLICTS with net-im/simicq and net-im/sim-im-devel
- Update WWW
Repocopied by: marcus
and Catalyst::Devel, and Catalyst::Plugin::Static::Simple, and
Catalyst::Plugin::ConfigLoader is no longer included in distribution.
Catalyst.pm is in the Catalyst::Runtime distribution, so p5-Catalyst will
point at p5-Catalyst-Runtime in MOVED.
- audio/py-shellac -> audio/shellac because it's application not a library. [1]
PR: ports/99165 [1]
Submitted by: Alexander Botero-Lowry <alex@foxybanana.com> [1]
Repocopy by: marcus [1]
- Update to 2.0.2 [2]
- Take maintainership [2]
PR: ports/98686 [1], ports/98732 [2]
Submitted by: Jose Alonso Cardenas Marquez <acardenas@bsd.org.pe>
Repocopied by: marcus
- Update to 0.8.1
- Enable full exif support by default
- Update COMMENT and pkg-descr
PR: ports/96821
Submitted by: sat
Approved by: krion (then mentor)
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for other ports, chase the rename.
x11-toolkits/gtk--2-reference -> x11-toolkits/gtkmm20-reference
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for other ports, chase the rename.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for other ports, chase the rename.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for other ports, chase the rename.
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for other ports, chase the rename.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for other ports, chase the rename.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
x11/gnomepanel-reference -> x11/gnome-panel-reference
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for japanese/gnomelibs, chase the rename.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for x11/gnome2-fifth-toe, chase the rename.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
x11/gnomedesktop-reference -> x11/gnome-desktop-reference
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for other ports, chase the rename.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for other ports, chase the rename.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcu
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for x11-toolkits/py-gnome2, chase the rename.
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for other ports, chase the rename.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for other ports, chase the rename.
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for x11/gnome2 chase the rename.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for editors/abiword-plugins, x11/gnome2 and x11/gnome2-lite chase the rename.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for audio/goobox, audio/rhythmbox, audio/sound-juicer, x11/gnome2,
x11/gnome2-lite and x11-toolkits/py-gnome-desktop chase the rename.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
Rename this ports to use the real vendor package name. The advantage of this
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for deskutils/timer-applet, x11/gnome2 and x11/gnome2-lite chase the rename.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for x11/gcursor, x11/gnome2 and x11/gnome2-lite chase the rename.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for deskutils/superswitcher, devel/configgen and devel/gnome2-hacker-tools,
chase the rename.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for x11/gnome2-power-tools, chase the rename.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
is to allow our users' keyword search works and easier for users to file the
Bugzilla report when they use our name of ports. Debian, Gentoo, NetBSD and
other OSs have the correct package name, but not in our ports tree.
My team, FreeBSD GNOME Team, have agreed with it.
As for accessibility/gnopernicus, chase the rename.
PR: ports/97985
Repocopy by: marcus
- remove all slave ports
- add the ability to build all SAPIs concurrently
- update php5 to 5.1.4
*Read* the UPDATING file *before* trying to update PHP
(or at least before mailing me).
sysutils/sge53.
The dependency check in ports/Tools/scripts/rmport missed
sysutils/sgeee53/Makefile:MASTERDIR= ${.CURDIR}/../sge53
when I removed sysutils/sge53.
I will update the script to catch such "dependencies" ASAP.
The EULA says:
You may not use the Software on ... (D) any operating system that
is not an Authorized Operating System.
and FreeBSD is not an Authorized Operating System which it defines.
Discussed with: maintainer (jamie at bishopston dot net),
portmgr (kris and krion)
functionality of textproc/p5-JSON-Syck, retire the latter and note this
in the MOVED.
This commit is partially based on the PR mentioned below.
PR: 95412
Submitted by: Paul Dlug <paul@aps.org>
ve is a tiny editor, about 60K. It's woju's favorite UNIX editor.
The most obvious weakness of ve is changing TABs into Spaces. So
please don't use ve to edit TAB-important files, such as Makefile,
sendmail.cf, syslog.conf... etc.
PR: ports/92248
Submitted by: chinsan <chinsan.tw@gmail.com>
o Integrated to mail/squirrelmail
o Corresponding to vulnerability is late
PR: ports/94040
Submitted by: Masafumi Otsune <info@otsune.com> (maintainer)
Approved by: portmgr (linimon)
pointing to devel/libtool15, given the reworking that has been carried
out, and that devel/libtool13 is to all intents and purposes, a build-time
dependency.
Approved by: portmgr (implicit)
These changes apply to all ports, unless mentioned otherwise:
- Move jakarta-tomcat55 to tomcat55 (it is no longer a Jakarta project). [6]
- Improve the tomcat55 rc script. Fix PID handling. Improve the
shutdown process. Use USE_RC_SUBR to its full potential. [2]
- Backport tomcat55 rc script to the other tomcat ports. This allows
us to pass command line arguments to the JVM. Noted in UPDATING.
[1], [3], [4]
- Change ownership of installed files. All files are now installed
with default uid/gid (root:wheel) except for those in the conf/, logs/,
temp/ and work/ directories. [5]
- No longer install tomcatXXctl binary. rc scripts are more flexible
and can be reconfigured without recompiling.
- Remove AUTO_START and STOP_TIMEOUT (replaced with rc tomcatXX_stop_timeout).
- Remove a long list of sed expressions in favour of SUB_LIST.
- Move pkg_{,de}install to files/pkg_{,de}install.in. Add them to
SUB_FILES. Tidy up substitutions and remove hardcoded values.
- Some nonfunctional tidying and removal of Makefile cruft.
PR: ports/38018 [1], ports/38020 [2], ports/74344 [3],
ports/75143 [4], ports/83434 [5], ports/92692 [6]
Submitted by: Ari Suutari <ari.suutari@syncrontech.com> [1] [2],
SimpleRezo Team <freebsd@simplerezo.com> [3],
Anton Yudin <toha@toha.org.ua> [4],
Jan Grant <jan.grant@bristol.ac.uk> [5],
lawrance [6]
Approved by: Kang Liu <liukang@cn.freebsd.org> (maintainer) [6]
Maintainer timeouts on [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]
Big thanks to: hq for the initial tomcat55 script
jasonb on FreeNode #tomcat for packaging advice
