1
0
mirror of https://git.FreeBSD.org/ports.git synced 2024-11-04 22:33:27 +00:00
Commit Graph

13 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Bill Fumerola
8ad44f8e27 Upgrade to ethereal 0.7.7 from 0.7.5
The skip of 0.7.6 was not due to my usual lazyness, we found it didn't
work with bmake, and the authors actually _care_ about interplatform
building (and most of them use FreeBSD as a development platform) so
we worked out some problems with that and some autoconf "smarts" with
SNMP.
1999-10-29 00:35:16 +00:00
Bill Fumerola
c4bd783b24 Upgrade from 0.7.3 to 0.7.5, 0.7.4 had some serious errors with BSD
allegedly, so I'm glad I'm lazy.
1999-09-24 22:03:36 +00:00
Bill Fumerola
ff5623def3 Upgrade to 0.7.3 1999-09-01 20:18:59 +00:00
Bill Fumerola
cb30786ef1 Upgrade to 0.7.2, which fixes several large memory leaks. 1999-08-12 13:43:45 +00:00
Bill Fumerola
d7bc899542 Upgrade to 0.7.1, they actually released 0.7.1 before I could even
upgrade our tree to 0.7.0! It's good, however, because this version
fixes some significant bugs.
1999-08-05 20:14:21 +00:00
David E. O'Brien
263d6a8e9f Upgrade to version 0.6.3.
Don't use offical master sites for now.  Both webservers are down and one
returns a message that they don't know for how long.
1999-07-15 12:13:44 +00:00
Michael Haro
eb8a9a8461 Update to 0.6.2
Submitted by: Oyvind Moll  oyvindmo@initio.no
PR Number: 11882
1999-05-25 18:24:40 +00:00
Vanilla I. Shu
f56ea1a531 Upgrade to 0.5.1, and change LIBDEPEND to glib11-devel. 1999-01-05 13:50:00 +00:00
Vanilla I. Shu
3e218bf034 Upgrade to 0.5.0, it can works with gtk11 still :( 1998-11-23 18:22:53 +00:00
Vanilla I. Shu
2c92c9bad1 Upgrade to 0.4.1, remove the TAG of USE_AUTOCONF,
add GNU_CONFIGURE.
Remind by:	Ollivier Robert
1998-10-20 18:10:47 +00:00
Vanilla I. Shu
ccc87294f6 Upgrade to 0.4.0
PR:		ports/8291
Submitted by:	maintainer
1998-10-19 15:51:25 +00:00
Joseph Koshy
5cd1788fa1 Upgrade to v0.3.17.
Submitted by: Bill Fumerola <billf@jade.chc-chimes.com> (maintainer)
1998-09-29 01:32:42 +00:00
Vanilla I. Shu
1ceb2a08d2 a network sniffer a la NetXray. With a little work and development this could
rival NetXray (which is approx $4,000).
PR:		ports/7581
Submitted by:	Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com>
1998-09-18 21:53:24 +00:00