Mikhail Teterin 4d91afbf2c This package has a controversial history. It was originally "given" to ... the ImageMagick team, where Bob Friesenhahn made it work with IM. Since then, Bob and other developers forked GraphicsMagick. libfpx remained unchanged until January 2005, when ImageMagick released an updated tar-ball with a patch applied. The release was botched (missing a subdirectory) and I changed the port to use the old tar-ball on GraphicsMagick's site and apply the same patch. Since then, GraphicsMagick replaced the old 1.2.0.9 tarball with the new 1.2.0.10, where the patch is applied. On the same date, ImageMagick, not to be outdone, "released" 1.2.0.11, WHICH IS NO DIFFERENT from GraphicsMagick's version, except for libtool/configure soup. I'm now switching the port to ImageMagick's mirrors again, simply because they seem to have better bandwidth. I must add, for the record, that ImageMagick team's behavior appears rather dubious and unscrupulous in this incident. There was no need to "release" their own tarball, especially considering, that some sources are marked as "GraphicsMagick" (an embarassing oversight). I also found, that those of my postings on ImageMagick's support forum, which mentioned GraphicsMagick, were misteriously removed from the board shortly after posting... This update is made neccessary by there being no MASTER_SITES for the original 1.2.0.9 tarball left. While at it, however, I also remove the jpeg-dependency -- libfpx does not, actually, use it. Prompted by: pointyhat (kris)		2005-02-14 20:59:50 +00:00
..
files	This package has a controversial history. It was originally "given" to	2005-02-14 20:59:50 +00:00
distinfo	This package has a controversial history. It was originally "given" to	2005-02-14 20:59:50 +00:00
Makefile	This package has a controversial history. It was originally "given" to	2005-02-14 20:59:50 +00:00
pkg-descr
pkg-plist