2005-01-06 23:35:40 +00:00
|
|
|
/*-
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2001 Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>.
|
|
|
|
* All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
|
|
|
|
* modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
|
|
|
|
* are met:
|
|
|
|
* 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
|
|
|
|
* notice(s), this list of conditions and the following disclaimer as
|
2004-01-10 18:34:01 +00:00
|
|
|
* the first lines of this file unmodified other than the possible
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
* addition of one or more copyright notices.
|
|
|
|
* 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
|
|
|
|
* notice(s), this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
|
|
|
|
* documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER(S) ``AS IS'' AND ANY
|
|
|
|
* EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED
|
|
|
|
* WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE
|
|
|
|
* DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER(S) BE LIABLE FOR ANY
|
|
|
|
* DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES
|
|
|
|
* (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR
|
|
|
|
* SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER
|
|
|
|
* CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
|
|
|
|
* LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
|
|
|
|
* OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
|
|
|
|
* DAMAGE.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
2003-06-11 00:56:59 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <sys/cdefs.h>
|
|
|
|
__FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
|
|
|
|
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <sys/param.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/systm.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/kernel.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/lock.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/mutex.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/proc.h>
|
2006-03-14 04:00:21 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <sys/resourcevar.h>
|
2004-06-11 17:48:20 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <sys/smp.h>
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <sys/sysctl.h>
|
2002-11-21 01:22:38 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <sys/sched.h>
|
Switch the sleep/wakeup and condition variable implementations to use the
sleep queue interface:
- Sleep queues attempt to merge some of the benefits of both sleep queues
and condition variables. Having sleep qeueus in a hash table avoids
having to allocate a queue head for each wait channel. Thus, struct cv
has shrunk down to just a single char * pointer now. However, the
hash table does not hold threads directly, but queue heads. This means
that once you have located a queue in the hash bucket, you no longer have
to walk the rest of the hash chain looking for threads. Instead, you have
a list of all the threads sleeping on that wait channel.
- Outside of the sleepq code and the sleep/cv code the kernel no longer
differentiates between cv's and sleep/wakeup. For example, calls to
abortsleep() and cv_abort() are replaced with a call to sleepq_abort().
Thus, the TDF_CVWAITQ flag is removed. Also, calls to unsleep() and
cv_waitq_remove() have been replaced with calls to sleepq_remove().
- The sched_sleep() function no longer accepts a priority argument as
sleep's no longer inherently bump the priority. Instead, this is soley
a propery of msleep() which explicitly calls sched_prio() before
blocking.
- The TDF_ONSLEEPQ flag has been dropped as it was never used. The
associated TDF_SET_ONSLEEPQ and TDF_CLR_ON_SLEEPQ macros have also been
dropped and replaced with a single explicit clearing of td_wchan.
TD_SET_ONSLEEPQ() would really have only made sense if it had taken
the wait channel and message as arguments anyway. Now that that only
happens in one place, a macro would be overkill.
2004-02-27 18:52:44 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <sys/sleepqueue.h>
|
Add an implementation of turnstiles and change the sleep mutex code to use
turnstiles to implement blocking isntead of implementing a thread queue
directly. These turnstiles are somewhat similar to those used in Solaris 7
as described in Solaris Internals but are also different.
Turnstiles do not come out of a fixed-sized pool. Rather, each thread is
assigned a turnstile when it is created that it frees when it is destroyed.
When a thread blocks on a lock, it donates its turnstile to that lock to
serve as queue of blocked threads. The queue associated with a given lock
is found by a lookup in a simple hash table. The turnstile itself is
protected by a lock associated with its entry in the hash table. This
means that sched_lock is no longer needed to contest on a mutex. Instead,
sched_lock is only used when manipulating run queues or thread priorities.
Turnstiles also implement priority propagation inherently.
Currently turnstiles only support mutexes. Eventually, however, turnstiles
may grow two queue's to support a non-sleepable reader/writer lock
implementation. For more details, see the comments in sys/turnstile.h and
kern/subr_turnstile.c.
The two primary advantages from the turnstile code include: 1) the size
of struct mutex shrinks by four pointers as it no longer stores the
thread queue linkages directly, and 2) less contention on sched_lock in
SMP systems including the ability for multiple CPUs to contend on different
locks simultaneously (not that this last detail is necessarily that much of
a big win). Note that 1) means that this commit is a kernel ABI breaker,
so don't mix old modules with a new kernel and vice versa.
Tested on: i386 SMP, sparc64 SMP, alpha SMP
2003-11-11 22:07:29 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <sys/turnstile.h>
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <sys/ktr.h>
|
2005-03-05 09:15:03 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <sys/umtx.h>
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2006-02-02 00:37:05 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <security/audit/audit.h>
|
|
|
|
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <vm/vm.h>
|
2003-06-14 23:23:55 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <vm/vm_extern.h>
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <vm/uma.h>
|
2002-07-17 23:43:55 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2006-10-26 21:42:22 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* thread related storage.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
static uma_zone_t thread_zone;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYSCTL_NODE(_kern, OID_AUTO, threads, CTLFLAG_RW, 0, "thread allocation");
|
2002-11-17 11:47:03 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2004-06-07 19:00:57 +00:00
|
|
|
int max_threads_per_proc = 1500;
|
2002-11-17 11:47:03 +00:00
|
|
|
SYSCTL_INT(_kern_threads, OID_AUTO, max_threads_per_proc, CTLFLAG_RW,
|
2002-09-15 23:52:25 +00:00
|
|
|
&max_threads_per_proc, 0, "Limit on threads per proc");
|
|
|
|
|
2004-06-07 19:00:57 +00:00
|
|
|
int max_threads_hits;
|
2003-02-19 04:01:55 +00:00
|
|
|
SYSCTL_INT(_kern_threads, OID_AUTO, max_threads_hits, CTLFLAG_RD,
|
|
|
|
&max_threads_hits, 0, "");
|
|
|
|
|
2006-10-26 21:42:22 +00:00
|
|
|
#ifdef KSE
|
2004-06-11 17:48:20 +00:00
|
|
|
int virtual_cpu;
|
|
|
|
|
2006-10-26 21:42:22 +00:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
2003-02-17 05:14:26 +00:00
|
|
|
TAILQ_HEAD(, thread) zombie_threads = TAILQ_HEAD_INITIALIZER(zombie_threads);
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
struct mtx zombie_lock;
|
|
|
|
MTX_SYSINIT(zombie_lock, &zombie_lock, "zombie lock", MTX_SPIN);
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2007-06-12 07:24:46 +00:00
|
|
|
static void thread_zombie(struct thread *);
|
|
|
|
|
2006-10-26 21:42:22 +00:00
|
|
|
#ifdef KSE
|
2004-06-11 17:48:20 +00:00
|
|
|
static int
|
|
|
|
sysctl_kse_virtual_cpu(SYSCTL_HANDLER_ARGS)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int error, new_val;
|
|
|
|
int def_val;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def_val = mp_ncpus;
|
|
|
|
if (virtual_cpu == 0)
|
|
|
|
new_val = def_val;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
new_val = virtual_cpu;
|
|
|
|
error = sysctl_handle_int(oidp, &new_val, 0, req);
|
2004-08-14 07:21:20 +00:00
|
|
|
if (error != 0 || req->newptr == NULL)
|
2004-06-11 17:48:20 +00:00
|
|
|
return (error);
|
|
|
|
if (new_val < 0)
|
|
|
|
return (EINVAL);
|
|
|
|
virtual_cpu = new_val;
|
|
|
|
return (0);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* DEBUG ONLY */
|
|
|
|
SYSCTL_PROC(_kern_threads, OID_AUTO, virtual_cpu, CTLTYPE_INT|CTLFLAG_RW,
|
|
|
|
0, sizeof(virtual_cpu), sysctl_kse_virtual_cpu, "I",
|
|
|
|
"debug virtual cpus");
|
2006-10-26 21:42:22 +00:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
2002-10-24 08:46:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2004-04-03 15:59:13 +00:00
|
|
|
struct mtx tid_lock;
|
2005-03-18 12:34:14 +00:00
|
|
|
static struct unrhdr *tid_unrhdr;
|
2004-04-03 15:59:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2002-12-10 02:33:45 +00:00
|
|
|
* Prepare a thread for use.
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2004-08-02 00:18:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static int
|
|
|
|
thread_ctor(void *mem, int size, void *arg, int flags)
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct thread *td;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
td = (struct thread *)mem;
|
2002-09-11 08:13:56 +00:00
|
|
|
td->td_state = TDS_INACTIVE;
|
2004-09-22 15:24:33 +00:00
|
|
|
td->td_oncpu = NOCPU;
|
2004-06-09 14:06:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-03-19 08:22:13 +00:00
|
|
|
td->td_tid = alloc_unr(tid_unrhdr);
|
2007-03-09 04:02:38 +00:00
|
|
|
td->td_syscalls = 0;
|
2005-03-19 08:22:13 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2004-06-09 14:06:44 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Note that td_critnest begins life as 1 because the thread is not
|
|
|
|
* running and is thereby implicitly waiting to be on the receiving
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
* end of a context switch.
|
2004-06-09 14:06:44 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2003-08-04 20:28:20 +00:00
|
|
|
td->td_critnest = 1;
|
2006-02-02 00:37:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef AUDIT
|
|
|
|
audit_thread_alloc(td);
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
This is initial version of POSIX priority mutex support, a new userland
mutex structure is added as following:
struct umutex {
__lwpid_t m_owner;
uint32_t m_flags;
uint32_t m_ceilings[2];
uint32_t m_spare[4];
};
The m_owner represents owner thread, it is a thread id, in non-contested
case, userland can simply use atomic_cmpset_int to lock the mutex, if the
mutex is contested, high order bit will be set, and userland should do locking
and unlocking via kernel syscall. Flag UMUTEX_PRIO_INHERIT represents
pthread's PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT mutex, which when contention happens, kernel
should do priority propagating. Flag UMUTEX_PRIO_PROTECT indicates it is
pthread's PTHREAD_PRIO_PROTECT mutex, userland should initialize m_owner
to contested state UMUTEX_CONTESTED, then atomic_cmpset_int will be failure
and kernel syscall should be invoked to do locking, this becauses
for such a mutex, kernel should always boost the thread's priority before
it can lock the mutex, m_ceilings is used by PTHREAD_PRIO_PROTECT mutex,
the first element is used to boost thread's priority when it locked the mutex,
second element is used when the mutex is unlocked, the PTHREAD_PRIO_PROTECT
mutex's link list is kept in userland, the m_ceiling[1] is managed by thread
library so kernel needn't allocate memory to keep the link list, when such
a mutex is unlocked, kernel reset m_owner to UMUTEX_CONTESTED.
Flag USYNC_PROCESS_SHARED indicate if the synchronization object is process
shared, if the flag is not set, it saves a vm_map_lookup() call.
The umtx chain is still used as a sleep queue, when a thread is blocked on
PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT mutex, a umtx_pi is allocated to support priority
propagating, it is dynamically allocated and reference count is used,
it is not optimized but works well in my tests, while the umtx chain has
its own locking protocol, the priority propagating protocol are all protected
by sched_lock because priority propagating function is called with sched_lock
held from scheduler.
No visible performance degradation is found which these changes. Some parameter
names in _umtx_op syscall are renamed.
2006-08-28 04:24:51 +00:00
|
|
|
umtx_thread_alloc(td);
|
2004-08-02 00:18:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return (0);
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Reclaim a thread after use.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
thread_dtor(void *mem, int size, void *arg)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2004-04-03 15:59:13 +00:00
|
|
|
struct thread *td;
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
td = (struct thread *)mem;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef INVARIANTS
|
|
|
|
/* Verify that this thread is in a safe state to free. */
|
|
|
|
switch (td->td_state) {
|
2002-09-11 08:13:56 +00:00
|
|
|
case TDS_INHIBITED:
|
|
|
|
case TDS_RUNNING:
|
|
|
|
case TDS_CAN_RUN:
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
case TDS_RUNQ:
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* We must never unlink a thread that is in one of
|
|
|
|
* these states, because it is currently active.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
panic("bad state for thread unlinking");
|
|
|
|
/* NOTREACHED */
|
2002-09-11 08:13:56 +00:00
|
|
|
case TDS_INACTIVE:
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
panic("bad thread state");
|
|
|
|
/* NOTREACHED */
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
2006-02-05 21:06:09 +00:00
|
|
|
#ifdef AUDIT
|
|
|
|
audit_thread_free(td);
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
2005-03-19 08:22:13 +00:00
|
|
|
free_unr(tid_unrhdr, td->td_tid);
|
2004-09-05 02:09:54 +00:00
|
|
|
sched_newthread(td);
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Initialize type-stable parts of a thread (when newly created).
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2004-08-02 00:18:36 +00:00
|
|
|
static int
|
|
|
|
thread_init(void *mem, int size, int flags)
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2004-06-26 18:58:22 +00:00
|
|
|
struct thread *td;
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
td = (struct thread *)mem;
|
2004-06-26 18:58:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2003-06-14 23:23:55 +00:00
|
|
|
vm_thread_new(td, 0);
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
cpu_thread_setup(td);
|
Switch the sleep/wakeup and condition variable implementations to use the
sleep queue interface:
- Sleep queues attempt to merge some of the benefits of both sleep queues
and condition variables. Having sleep qeueus in a hash table avoids
having to allocate a queue head for each wait channel. Thus, struct cv
has shrunk down to just a single char * pointer now. However, the
hash table does not hold threads directly, but queue heads. This means
that once you have located a queue in the hash bucket, you no longer have
to walk the rest of the hash chain looking for threads. Instead, you have
a list of all the threads sleeping on that wait channel.
- Outside of the sleepq code and the sleep/cv code the kernel no longer
differentiates between cv's and sleep/wakeup. For example, calls to
abortsleep() and cv_abort() are replaced with a call to sleepq_abort().
Thus, the TDF_CVWAITQ flag is removed. Also, calls to unsleep() and
cv_waitq_remove() have been replaced with calls to sleepq_remove().
- The sched_sleep() function no longer accepts a priority argument as
sleep's no longer inherently bump the priority. Instead, this is soley
a propery of msleep() which explicitly calls sched_prio() before
blocking.
- The TDF_ONSLEEPQ flag has been dropped as it was never used. The
associated TDF_SET_ONSLEEPQ and TDF_CLR_ON_SLEEPQ macros have also been
dropped and replaced with a single explicit clearing of td_wchan.
TD_SET_ONSLEEPQ() would really have only made sense if it had taken
the wait channel and message as arguments anyway. Now that that only
happens in one place, a macro would be overkill.
2004-02-27 18:52:44 +00:00
|
|
|
td->td_sleepqueue = sleepq_alloc();
|
Add an implementation of turnstiles and change the sleep mutex code to use
turnstiles to implement blocking isntead of implementing a thread queue
directly. These turnstiles are somewhat similar to those used in Solaris 7
as described in Solaris Internals but are also different.
Turnstiles do not come out of a fixed-sized pool. Rather, each thread is
assigned a turnstile when it is created that it frees when it is destroyed.
When a thread blocks on a lock, it donates its turnstile to that lock to
serve as queue of blocked threads. The queue associated with a given lock
is found by a lookup in a simple hash table. The turnstile itself is
protected by a lock associated with its entry in the hash table. This
means that sched_lock is no longer needed to contest on a mutex. Instead,
sched_lock is only used when manipulating run queues or thread priorities.
Turnstiles also implement priority propagation inherently.
Currently turnstiles only support mutexes. Eventually, however, turnstiles
may grow two queue's to support a non-sleepable reader/writer lock
implementation. For more details, see the comments in sys/turnstile.h and
kern/subr_turnstile.c.
The two primary advantages from the turnstile code include: 1) the size
of struct mutex shrinks by four pointers as it no longer stores the
thread queue linkages directly, and 2) less contention on sched_lock in
SMP systems including the ability for multiple CPUs to contend on different
locks simultaneously (not that this last detail is necessarily that much of
a big win). Note that 1) means that this commit is a kernel ABI breaker,
so don't mix old modules with a new kernel and vice versa.
Tested on: i386 SMP, sparc64 SMP, alpha SMP
2003-11-11 22:07:29 +00:00
|
|
|
td->td_turnstile = turnstile_alloc();
|
2002-11-21 01:22:38 +00:00
|
|
|
td->td_sched = (struct td_sched *)&td[1];
|
2004-09-05 02:09:54 +00:00
|
|
|
sched_newthread(td);
|
This is initial version of POSIX priority mutex support, a new userland
mutex structure is added as following:
struct umutex {
__lwpid_t m_owner;
uint32_t m_flags;
uint32_t m_ceilings[2];
uint32_t m_spare[4];
};
The m_owner represents owner thread, it is a thread id, in non-contested
case, userland can simply use atomic_cmpset_int to lock the mutex, if the
mutex is contested, high order bit will be set, and userland should do locking
and unlocking via kernel syscall. Flag UMUTEX_PRIO_INHERIT represents
pthread's PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT mutex, which when contention happens, kernel
should do priority propagating. Flag UMUTEX_PRIO_PROTECT indicates it is
pthread's PTHREAD_PRIO_PROTECT mutex, userland should initialize m_owner
to contested state UMUTEX_CONTESTED, then atomic_cmpset_int will be failure
and kernel syscall should be invoked to do locking, this becauses
for such a mutex, kernel should always boost the thread's priority before
it can lock the mutex, m_ceilings is used by PTHREAD_PRIO_PROTECT mutex,
the first element is used to boost thread's priority when it locked the mutex,
second element is used when the mutex is unlocked, the PTHREAD_PRIO_PROTECT
mutex's link list is kept in userland, the m_ceiling[1] is managed by thread
library so kernel needn't allocate memory to keep the link list, when such
a mutex is unlocked, kernel reset m_owner to UMUTEX_CONTESTED.
Flag USYNC_PROCESS_SHARED indicate if the synchronization object is process
shared, if the flag is not set, it saves a vm_map_lookup() call.
The umtx chain is still used as a sleep queue, when a thread is blocked on
PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT mutex, a umtx_pi is allocated to support priority
propagating, it is dynamically allocated and reference count is used,
it is not optimized but works well in my tests, while the umtx chain has
its own locking protocol, the priority propagating protocol are all protected
by sched_lock because priority propagating function is called with sched_lock
held from scheduler.
No visible performance degradation is found which these changes. Some parameter
names in _umtx_op syscall are renamed.
2006-08-28 04:24:51 +00:00
|
|
|
umtx_thread_init(td);
|
2004-08-02 00:18:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return (0);
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Tear down type-stable parts of a thread (just before being discarded).
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
thread_fini(void *mem, int size)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2004-06-26 18:58:22 +00:00
|
|
|
struct thread *td;
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
td = (struct thread *)mem;
|
Add an implementation of turnstiles and change the sleep mutex code to use
turnstiles to implement blocking isntead of implementing a thread queue
directly. These turnstiles are somewhat similar to those used in Solaris 7
as described in Solaris Internals but are also different.
Turnstiles do not come out of a fixed-sized pool. Rather, each thread is
assigned a turnstile when it is created that it frees when it is destroyed.
When a thread blocks on a lock, it donates its turnstile to that lock to
serve as queue of blocked threads. The queue associated with a given lock
is found by a lookup in a simple hash table. The turnstile itself is
protected by a lock associated with its entry in the hash table. This
means that sched_lock is no longer needed to contest on a mutex. Instead,
sched_lock is only used when manipulating run queues or thread priorities.
Turnstiles also implement priority propagation inherently.
Currently turnstiles only support mutexes. Eventually, however, turnstiles
may grow two queue's to support a non-sleepable reader/writer lock
implementation. For more details, see the comments in sys/turnstile.h and
kern/subr_turnstile.c.
The two primary advantages from the turnstile code include: 1) the size
of struct mutex shrinks by four pointers as it no longer stores the
thread queue linkages directly, and 2) less contention on sched_lock in
SMP systems including the ability for multiple CPUs to contend on different
locks simultaneously (not that this last detail is necessarily that much of
a big win). Note that 1) means that this commit is a kernel ABI breaker,
so don't mix old modules with a new kernel and vice versa.
Tested on: i386 SMP, sparc64 SMP, alpha SMP
2003-11-11 22:07:29 +00:00
|
|
|
turnstile_free(td->td_turnstile);
|
Switch the sleep/wakeup and condition variable implementations to use the
sleep queue interface:
- Sleep queues attempt to merge some of the benefits of both sleep queues
and condition variables. Having sleep qeueus in a hash table avoids
having to allocate a queue head for each wait channel. Thus, struct cv
has shrunk down to just a single char * pointer now. However, the
hash table does not hold threads directly, but queue heads. This means
that once you have located a queue in the hash bucket, you no longer have
to walk the rest of the hash chain looking for threads. Instead, you have
a list of all the threads sleeping on that wait channel.
- Outside of the sleepq code and the sleep/cv code the kernel no longer
differentiates between cv's and sleep/wakeup. For example, calls to
abortsleep() and cv_abort() are replaced with a call to sleepq_abort().
Thus, the TDF_CVWAITQ flag is removed. Also, calls to unsleep() and
cv_waitq_remove() have been replaced with calls to sleepq_remove().
- The sched_sleep() function no longer accepts a priority argument as
sleep's no longer inherently bump the priority. Instead, this is soley
a propery of msleep() which explicitly calls sched_prio() before
blocking.
- The TDF_ONSLEEPQ flag has been dropped as it was never used. The
associated TDF_SET_ONSLEEPQ and TDF_CLR_ON_SLEEPQ macros have also been
dropped and replaced with a single explicit clearing of td_wchan.
TD_SET_ONSLEEPQ() would really have only made sense if it had taken
the wait channel and message as arguments anyway. Now that that only
happens in one place, a macro would be overkill.
2004-02-27 18:52:44 +00:00
|
|
|
sleepq_free(td->td_sleepqueue);
|
This is initial version of POSIX priority mutex support, a new userland
mutex structure is added as following:
struct umutex {
__lwpid_t m_owner;
uint32_t m_flags;
uint32_t m_ceilings[2];
uint32_t m_spare[4];
};
The m_owner represents owner thread, it is a thread id, in non-contested
case, userland can simply use atomic_cmpset_int to lock the mutex, if the
mutex is contested, high order bit will be set, and userland should do locking
and unlocking via kernel syscall. Flag UMUTEX_PRIO_INHERIT represents
pthread's PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT mutex, which when contention happens, kernel
should do priority propagating. Flag UMUTEX_PRIO_PROTECT indicates it is
pthread's PTHREAD_PRIO_PROTECT mutex, userland should initialize m_owner
to contested state UMUTEX_CONTESTED, then atomic_cmpset_int will be failure
and kernel syscall should be invoked to do locking, this becauses
for such a mutex, kernel should always boost the thread's priority before
it can lock the mutex, m_ceilings is used by PTHREAD_PRIO_PROTECT mutex,
the first element is used to boost thread's priority when it locked the mutex,
second element is used when the mutex is unlocked, the PTHREAD_PRIO_PROTECT
mutex's link list is kept in userland, the m_ceiling[1] is managed by thread
library so kernel needn't allocate memory to keep the link list, when such
a mutex is unlocked, kernel reset m_owner to UMUTEX_CONTESTED.
Flag USYNC_PROCESS_SHARED indicate if the synchronization object is process
shared, if the flag is not set, it saves a vm_map_lookup() call.
The umtx chain is still used as a sleep queue, when a thread is blocked on
PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT mutex, a umtx_pi is allocated to support priority
propagating, it is dynamically allocated and reference count is used,
it is not optimized but works well in my tests, while the umtx chain has
its own locking protocol, the priority propagating protocol are all protected
by sched_lock because priority propagating function is called with sched_lock
held from scheduler.
No visible performance degradation is found which these changes. Some parameter
names in _umtx_op syscall are renamed.
2006-08-28 04:24:51 +00:00
|
|
|
umtx_thread_fini(td);
|
2003-06-14 23:23:55 +00:00
|
|
|
vm_thread_dispose(td);
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2003-02-17 05:14:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2002-10-24 08:46:34 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2003-02-17 05:14:26 +00:00
|
|
|
* For a newly created process,
|
|
|
|
* link up all the structures and its initial threads etc.
|
2004-09-05 02:09:54 +00:00
|
|
|
* called from:
|
|
|
|
* {arch}/{arch}/machdep.c ia64_init(), init386() etc.
|
|
|
|
* proc_dtor() (should go away)
|
|
|
|
* proc_init()
|
2002-10-24 08:46:34 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void
|
2006-10-26 21:42:22 +00:00
|
|
|
proc_linkup(struct proc *p, struct thread *td)
|
2002-10-24 08:46:34 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2002-10-24 08:46:34 +00:00
|
|
|
TAILQ_INIT(&p->p_threads); /* all threads in proc */
|
2007-06-12 19:49:39 +00:00
|
|
|
#ifdef KSE
|
2006-12-06 06:34:57 +00:00
|
|
|
TAILQ_INIT(&p->p_upcalls); /* upcall list */
|
2007-06-12 19:49:39 +00:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
1. Change prototype of trapsignal and sendsig to use ksiginfo_t *, most
changes in MD code are trivial, before this change, trapsignal and
sendsig use discrete parameters, now they uses member fields of
ksiginfo_t structure. For sendsig, this change allows us to pass
POSIX realtime signal value to user code.
2. Remove cpu_thread_siginfo, it is no longer needed because we now always
generate ksiginfo_t data and feed it to libpthread.
3. Add p_sigqueue to proc structure to hold shared signals which were
blocked by all threads in the proc.
4. Add td_sigqueue to thread structure to hold all signals delivered to
thread.
5. i386 and amd64 now return POSIX standard si_code, other arches will
be fixed.
6. In this sigqueue implementation, pending signal set is kept as before,
an extra siginfo list holds additional siginfo_t data for signals.
kernel code uses psignal() still behavior as before, it won't be failed
even under memory pressure, only exception is when deleting a signal,
we should call sigqueue_delete to remove signal from sigqueue but
not SIGDELSET. Current there is no kernel code will deliver a signal
with additional data, so kernel should be as stable as before,
a ksiginfo can carry more information, for example, allow signal to
be delivered but throw away siginfo data if memory is not enough.
SIGKILL and SIGSTOP have fast path in sigqueue_add, because they can
not be caught or masked.
The sigqueue() syscall allows user code to queue a signal to target
process, if resource is unavailable, EAGAIN will be returned as
specification said.
Just before thread exits, signal queue memory will be freed by
sigqueue_flush.
Current, all signals are allowed to be queued, not only realtime signals.
Earlier patch reviewed by: jhb, deischen
Tested on: i386, amd64
2005-10-14 12:43:47 +00:00
|
|
|
sigqueue_init(&p->p_sigqueue, p);
|
2005-12-09 02:27:55 +00:00
|
|
|
p->p_ksi = ksiginfo_alloc(1);
|
|
|
|
if (p->p_ksi != NULL) {
|
|
|
|
/* XXX p_ksi may be null if ksiginfo zone is not ready */
|
|
|
|
p->p_ksi->ksi_flags = KSI_EXT | KSI_INS;
|
2005-11-08 09:09:26 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2005-11-30 05:12:03 +00:00
|
|
|
LIST_INIT(&p->p_mqnotifier);
|
2002-10-24 08:46:34 +00:00
|
|
|
p->p_numthreads = 0;
|
2006-10-26 21:42:22 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_link(td, p);
|
2002-10-24 08:46:34 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Initialize global thread allocation resources.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
threadinit(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
2005-03-18 12:34:14 +00:00
|
|
|
mtx_init(&tid_lock, "TID lock", NULL, MTX_DEF);
|
|
|
|
tid_unrhdr = new_unrhdr(PID_MAX + 1, INT_MAX, &tid_lock);
|
|
|
|
|
2002-11-21 01:22:38 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_zone = uma_zcreate("THREAD", sched_sizeof_thread(),
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_ctor, thread_dtor, thread_init, thread_fini,
|
2007-03-27 16:51:34 +00:00
|
|
|
16 - 1, 0);
|
2006-10-26 21:42:22 +00:00
|
|
|
#ifdef KSE
|
2004-09-05 02:09:54 +00:00
|
|
|
kseinit(); /* set up kse specific stuff e.g. upcall zone*/
|
2006-10-26 21:42:22 +00:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2007-06-12 07:24:46 +00:00
|
|
|
* Place an unused thread on the zombie list.
|
2006-12-06 06:34:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* Use the slpq as that must be unused by now.
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void
|
2007-06-12 07:24:46 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_zombie(struct thread *td)
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
mtx_lock_spin(&zombie_lock);
|
2006-12-06 06:34:57 +00:00
|
|
|
TAILQ_INSERT_HEAD(&zombie_threads, td, td_slpq);
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
mtx_unlock_spin(&zombie_lock);
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2007-06-12 07:24:46 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Release a thread that has exited after cpu_throw().
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
thread_stash(struct thread *td)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
atomic_subtract_rel_int(&td->td_proc->p_exitthreads, 1);
|
|
|
|
thread_zombie(td);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2002-09-16 19:26:48 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2003-02-17 05:14:26 +00:00
|
|
|
* Reap zombie kse resource.
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
thread_reap(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2002-10-24 08:46:34 +00:00
|
|
|
struct thread *td_first, *td_next;
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2003-02-17 05:14:26 +00:00
|
|
|
* Don't even bother to lock if none at this instant,
|
|
|
|
* we really don't care about the next instant..
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2006-10-26 21:42:22 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!TAILQ_EMPTY(&zombie_threads)) {
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
mtx_lock_spin(&zombie_lock);
|
2002-10-24 08:46:34 +00:00
|
|
|
td_first = TAILQ_FIRST(&zombie_threads);
|
|
|
|
if (td_first)
|
|
|
|
TAILQ_INIT(&zombie_threads);
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
mtx_unlock_spin(&zombie_lock);
|
2002-10-24 08:46:34 +00:00
|
|
|
while (td_first) {
|
2006-12-06 06:34:57 +00:00
|
|
|
td_next = TAILQ_NEXT(td_first, td_slpq);
|
2003-02-17 05:14:26 +00:00
|
|
|
if (td_first->td_ucred)
|
|
|
|
crfree(td_first->td_ucred);
|
2002-10-24 08:46:34 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_free(td_first);
|
|
|
|
td_first = td_next;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Allocate a thread.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
struct thread *
|
|
|
|
thread_alloc(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2006-10-26 21:42:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_reap(); /* check if any zombies to get */
|
2003-02-19 05:47:46 +00:00
|
|
|
return (uma_zalloc(thread_zone, M_WAITOK));
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2002-09-15 23:52:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Deallocate a thread.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
thread_free(struct thread *td)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2002-12-10 02:33:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cpu_thread_clean(td);
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
uma_zfree(thread_zone, td);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Discard the current thread and exit from its context.
|
2004-06-11 17:48:20 +00:00
|
|
|
* Always called with scheduler locked.
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Because we can't free a thread while we're operating under its context,
|
2002-12-10 02:33:45 +00:00
|
|
|
* push the current thread into our CPU's deadthread holder. This means
|
|
|
|
* we needn't worry about someone else grabbing our context before we
|
2004-06-11 17:48:20 +00:00
|
|
|
* do a cpu_throw(). This may not be needed now as we are under schedlock.
|
|
|
|
* Maybe we can just do a thread_stash() as thr_exit1 does.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
/* XXX
|
|
|
|
* libthr expects its thread exit to return for the last
|
|
|
|
* thread, meaning that the program is back to non-threaded
|
|
|
|
* mode I guess. Because we do this (cpu_throw) unconditionally
|
|
|
|
* here, they have their own version of it. (thr_exit1())
|
|
|
|
* that doesn't do it all if this was the last thread.
|
|
|
|
* It is also called from thread_suspend_check().
|
|
|
|
* Of course in the end, they end up coming here through exit1
|
|
|
|
* anyhow.. After fixing 'thr' to play by the rules we should be able
|
|
|
|
* to merge these two functions together.
|
2004-09-05 02:09:54 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* called from:
|
|
|
|
* exit1()
|
|
|
|
* kse_exit()
|
|
|
|
* thr_exit()
|
2006-10-26 21:42:22 +00:00
|
|
|
* ifdef KSE
|
2004-09-05 02:09:54 +00:00
|
|
|
* thread_user_enter()
|
|
|
|
* thread_userret()
|
2006-10-26 21:42:22 +00:00
|
|
|
* endif
|
2004-09-05 02:09:54 +00:00
|
|
|
* thread_suspend_check()
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
thread_exit(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2006-03-14 04:00:21 +00:00
|
|
|
uint64_t new_switchtime;
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
struct thread *td;
|
2007-06-01 01:12:45 +00:00
|
|
|
struct thread *td2;
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
struct proc *p;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
td = curthread;
|
|
|
|
p = td->td_proc;
|
|
|
|
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
PROC_SLOCK_ASSERT(p, MA_OWNED);
|
2004-09-05 02:09:54 +00:00
|
|
|
mtx_assert(&Giant, MA_NOTOWNED);
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2004-09-05 02:09:54 +00:00
|
|
|
PROC_LOCK_ASSERT(p, MA_OWNED);
|
2002-08-29 19:49:53 +00:00
|
|
|
KASSERT(p != NULL, ("thread exiting without a process"));
|
2004-08-06 22:06:14 +00:00
|
|
|
CTR3(KTR_PROC, "thread_exit: thread %p (pid %ld, %s)", td,
|
|
|
|
(long)p->p_pid, p->p_comm);
|
1. Change prototype of trapsignal and sendsig to use ksiginfo_t *, most
changes in MD code are trivial, before this change, trapsignal and
sendsig use discrete parameters, now they uses member fields of
ksiginfo_t structure. For sendsig, this change allows us to pass
POSIX realtime signal value to user code.
2. Remove cpu_thread_siginfo, it is no longer needed because we now always
generate ksiginfo_t data and feed it to libpthread.
3. Add p_sigqueue to proc structure to hold shared signals which were
blocked by all threads in the proc.
4. Add td_sigqueue to thread structure to hold all signals delivered to
thread.
5. i386 and amd64 now return POSIX standard si_code, other arches will
be fixed.
6. In this sigqueue implementation, pending signal set is kept as before,
an extra siginfo list holds additional siginfo_t data for signals.
kernel code uses psignal() still behavior as before, it won't be failed
even under memory pressure, only exception is when deleting a signal,
we should call sigqueue_delete to remove signal from sigqueue but
not SIGDELSET. Current there is no kernel code will deliver a signal
with additional data, so kernel should be as stable as before,
a ksiginfo can carry more information, for example, allow signal to
be delivered but throw away siginfo data if memory is not enough.
SIGKILL and SIGSTOP have fast path in sigqueue_add, because they can
not be caught or masked.
The sigqueue() syscall allows user code to queue a signal to target
process, if resource is unavailable, EAGAIN will be returned as
specification said.
Just before thread exits, signal queue memory will be freed by
sigqueue_flush.
Current, all signals are allowed to be queued, not only realtime signals.
Earlier patch reviewed by: jhb, deischen
Tested on: i386, amd64
2005-10-14 12:43:47 +00:00
|
|
|
KASSERT(TAILQ_EMPTY(&td->td_sigqueue.sq_list), ("signal pending"));
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2006-02-06 01:51:08 +00:00
|
|
|
#ifdef AUDIT
|
|
|
|
AUDIT_SYSCALL_EXIT(0, td);
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
2006-10-26 21:42:22 +00:00
|
|
|
#ifdef KSE
|
2002-10-09 02:33:36 +00:00
|
|
|
if (td->td_standin != NULL) {
|
2004-09-05 02:09:54 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Note that we don't need to free the cred here as it
|
|
|
|
* is done in thread_reap().
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2007-06-12 07:24:46 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_zombie(td->td_standin);
|
2002-10-09 02:33:36 +00:00
|
|
|
td->td_standin = NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2006-10-26 21:42:22 +00:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
2002-10-09 02:33:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
This is initial version of POSIX priority mutex support, a new userland
mutex structure is added as following:
struct umutex {
__lwpid_t m_owner;
uint32_t m_flags;
uint32_t m_ceilings[2];
uint32_t m_spare[4];
};
The m_owner represents owner thread, it is a thread id, in non-contested
case, userland can simply use atomic_cmpset_int to lock the mutex, if the
mutex is contested, high order bit will be set, and userland should do locking
and unlocking via kernel syscall. Flag UMUTEX_PRIO_INHERIT represents
pthread's PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT mutex, which when contention happens, kernel
should do priority propagating. Flag UMUTEX_PRIO_PROTECT indicates it is
pthread's PTHREAD_PRIO_PROTECT mutex, userland should initialize m_owner
to contested state UMUTEX_CONTESTED, then atomic_cmpset_int will be failure
and kernel syscall should be invoked to do locking, this becauses
for such a mutex, kernel should always boost the thread's priority before
it can lock the mutex, m_ceilings is used by PTHREAD_PRIO_PROTECT mutex,
the first element is used to boost thread's priority when it locked the mutex,
second element is used when the mutex is unlocked, the PTHREAD_PRIO_PROTECT
mutex's link list is kept in userland, the m_ceiling[1] is managed by thread
library so kernel needn't allocate memory to keep the link list, when such
a mutex is unlocked, kernel reset m_owner to UMUTEX_CONTESTED.
Flag USYNC_PROCESS_SHARED indicate if the synchronization object is process
shared, if the flag is not set, it saves a vm_map_lookup() call.
The umtx chain is still used as a sleep queue, when a thread is blocked on
PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT mutex, a umtx_pi is allocated to support priority
propagating, it is dynamically allocated and reference count is used,
it is not optimized but works well in my tests, while the umtx chain has
its own locking protocol, the priority propagating protocol are all protected
by sched_lock because priority propagating function is called with sched_lock
held from scheduler.
No visible performance degradation is found which these changes. Some parameter
names in _umtx_op syscall are renamed.
2006-08-28 04:24:51 +00:00
|
|
|
umtx_thread_exit(td);
|
|
|
|
|
2004-09-05 02:09:54 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* drop FPU & debug register state storage, or any other
|
|
|
|
* architecture specific resources that
|
|
|
|
* would not be on a new untouched process.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
cpu_thread_exit(td); /* XXXSMP */
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-14 04:00:21 +00:00
|
|
|
/* Do the same timestamp bookkeeping that mi_switch() would do. */
|
|
|
|
new_switchtime = cpu_ticks();
|
|
|
|
p->p_rux.rux_runtime += (new_switchtime - PCPU_GET(switchtime));
|
|
|
|
PCPU_SET(switchtime, new_switchtime);
|
|
|
|
PCPU_SET(switchticks, ticks);
|
2007-06-04 21:45:18 +00:00
|
|
|
PCPU_INC(cnt.v_swtch);
|
2007-06-09 18:56:11 +00:00
|
|
|
/* Save our resource usage in our process. */
|
|
|
|
td->td_ru.ru_nvcsw++;
|
|
|
|
rucollect(&p->p_ru, &td->td_ru);
|
2002-08-29 19:49:53 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2002-09-06 07:00:37 +00:00
|
|
|
* The last thread is left attached to the process
|
|
|
|
* So that the whole bundle gets recycled. Skip
|
2004-09-05 02:09:54 +00:00
|
|
|
* all this stuff if we never had threads.
|
|
|
|
* EXIT clears all sign of other threads when
|
|
|
|
* it goes to single threading, so the last thread always
|
|
|
|
* takes the short path.
|
2002-08-29 19:49:53 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2004-09-05 02:09:54 +00:00
|
|
|
if (p->p_flag & P_HADTHREADS) {
|
|
|
|
if (p->p_numthreads > 1) {
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_lock(td);
|
|
|
|
#ifdef KSE
|
|
|
|
kse_unlink(td);
|
|
|
|
#else
|
2004-09-05 02:09:54 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_unlink(td);
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
thread_unlock(td);
|
2007-06-01 01:12:45 +00:00
|
|
|
td2 = FIRST_THREAD_IN_PROC(p);
|
|
|
|
sched_exit_thread(td2, td);
|
2004-09-05 02:09:54 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* The test below is NOT true if we are the
|
|
|
|
* sole exiting thread. P_STOPPED_SNGL is unset
|
|
|
|
* in exit1() after it is the only survivor.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (P_SHOULDSTOP(p) == P_STOPPED_SINGLE) {
|
|
|
|
if (p->p_numthreads == p->p_suspcount) {
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_lock(p->p_singlethread);
|
2004-09-05 02:09:54 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_unsuspend_one(p->p_singlethread);
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_unlock(p->p_singlethread);
|
2004-09-05 02:09:54 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2002-09-06 07:00:37 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2002-10-09 02:33:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2007-06-12 07:24:46 +00:00
|
|
|
atomic_add_int(&td->td_proc->p_exitthreads, 1);
|
2004-09-05 02:09:54 +00:00
|
|
|
PCPU_SET(deadthread, td);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* The last thread is exiting.. but not through exit()
|
|
|
|
* what should we do?
|
|
|
|
* Theoretically this can't happen
|
|
|
|
* exit1() - clears threading flags before coming here
|
|
|
|
* kse_exit() - treats last thread specially
|
|
|
|
* thr_exit() - treats last thread specially
|
2006-10-26 21:42:22 +00:00
|
|
|
* ifdef KSE
|
2004-09-05 02:09:54 +00:00
|
|
|
* thread_user_enter() - only if more exist
|
|
|
|
* thread_userret() - only if more exist
|
2006-10-26 21:42:22 +00:00
|
|
|
* endif
|
2004-09-05 02:09:54 +00:00
|
|
|
* thread_suspend_check() - only if more exist
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
panic ("thread_exit: Last thread exiting on its own");
|
2003-08-26 11:33:15 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
PROC_UNLOCK(p);
|
|
|
|
thread_lock(td);
|
2007-06-09 18:56:11 +00:00
|
|
|
/* Save our tick information with both the thread and proc locked */
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
ruxagg(&p->p_rux, td);
|
|
|
|
PROC_SUNLOCK(p);
|
2004-08-09 18:21:12 +00:00
|
|
|
td->td_state = TDS_INACTIVE;
|
|
|
|
CTR1(KTR_PROC, "thread_exit: cpu_throw() thread %p", td);
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
sched_throw(td);
|
2003-04-02 23:53:30 +00:00
|
|
|
panic("I'm a teapot!");
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
/* NOTREACHED */
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2004-01-10 18:34:01 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2002-12-10 02:33:45 +00:00
|
|
|
* Do any thread specific cleanups that may be needed in wait()
|
2004-03-13 22:31:39 +00:00
|
|
|
* called with Giant, proc and schedlock not held.
|
2002-12-10 02:33:45 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
thread_wait(struct proc *p)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct thread *td;
|
|
|
|
|
2004-03-13 22:31:39 +00:00
|
|
|
mtx_assert(&Giant, MA_NOTOWNED);
|
2004-01-10 18:34:01 +00:00
|
|
|
KASSERT((p->p_numthreads == 1), ("Multiple threads in wait1()"));
|
2007-06-12 07:24:46 +00:00
|
|
|
td = FIRST_THREAD_IN_PROC(p);
|
2006-10-26 21:42:22 +00:00
|
|
|
#ifdef KSE
|
2007-06-12 07:24:46 +00:00
|
|
|
if (td->td_standin != NULL) {
|
|
|
|
if (td->td_standin->td_ucred != NULL) {
|
|
|
|
crfree(td->td_standin->td_ucred);
|
|
|
|
td->td_standin->td_ucred = NULL;
|
2002-12-10 02:33:45 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2007-06-12 07:24:46 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_free(td->td_standin);
|
|
|
|
td->td_standin = NULL;
|
2002-12-10 02:33:45 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2007-06-12 07:24:46 +00:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
/* Lock the last thread so we spin until it exits cpu_throw(). */
|
|
|
|
thread_lock(td);
|
|
|
|
thread_unlock(td);
|
|
|
|
/* Wait for any remaining threads to exit cpu_throw(). */
|
|
|
|
while (p->p_exitthreads)
|
|
|
|
sched_relinquish(curthread);
|
|
|
|
cpu_thread_clean(td);
|
|
|
|
crfree(td->td_ucred);
|
2002-12-10 02:33:45 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_reap(); /* check for zombie threads etc. */
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Link a thread to a process.
|
2002-09-06 07:00:37 +00:00
|
|
|
* set up anything that needs to be initialized for it to
|
|
|
|
* be used by the process.
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Note that we do not link to the proc's ucred here.
|
|
|
|
* The thread is linked as if running but no KSE assigned.
|
2004-09-05 02:09:54 +00:00
|
|
|
* Called from:
|
|
|
|
* proc_linkup()
|
|
|
|
* thread_schedule_upcall()
|
|
|
|
* thr_create()
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void
|
2006-10-26 21:42:22 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_link(struct thread *td, struct proc *p)
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* XXX This can't be enabled because it's called for proc0 before
|
|
|
|
* it's spinlock has been created.
|
|
|
|
* PROC_SLOCK_ASSERT(p, MA_OWNED);
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2003-02-17 05:14:26 +00:00
|
|
|
td->td_state = TDS_INACTIVE;
|
|
|
|
td->td_proc = p;
|
|
|
|
td->td_flags = 0;
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2002-09-06 07:00:37 +00:00
|
|
|
LIST_INIT(&td->td_contested);
|
1. Change prototype of trapsignal and sendsig to use ksiginfo_t *, most
changes in MD code are trivial, before this change, trapsignal and
sendsig use discrete parameters, now they uses member fields of
ksiginfo_t structure. For sendsig, this change allows us to pass
POSIX realtime signal value to user code.
2. Remove cpu_thread_siginfo, it is no longer needed because we now always
generate ksiginfo_t data and feed it to libpthread.
3. Add p_sigqueue to proc structure to hold shared signals which were
blocked by all threads in the proc.
4. Add td_sigqueue to thread structure to hold all signals delivered to
thread.
5. i386 and amd64 now return POSIX standard si_code, other arches will
be fixed.
6. In this sigqueue implementation, pending signal set is kept as before,
an extra siginfo list holds additional siginfo_t data for signals.
kernel code uses psignal() still behavior as before, it won't be failed
even under memory pressure, only exception is when deleting a signal,
we should call sigqueue_delete to remove signal from sigqueue but
not SIGDELSET. Current there is no kernel code will deliver a signal
with additional data, so kernel should be as stable as before,
a ksiginfo can carry more information, for example, allow signal to
be delivered but throw away siginfo data if memory is not enough.
SIGKILL and SIGSTOP have fast path in sigqueue_add, because they can
not be caught or masked.
The sigqueue() syscall allows user code to queue a signal to target
process, if resource is unavailable, EAGAIN will be returned as
specification said.
Just before thread exits, signal queue memory will be freed by
sigqueue_flush.
Current, all signals are allowed to be queued, not only realtime signals.
Earlier patch reviewed by: jhb, deischen
Tested on: i386, amd64
2005-10-14 12:43:47 +00:00
|
|
|
sigqueue_init(&td->td_sigqueue, p);
|
2003-08-19 17:51:11 +00:00
|
|
|
callout_init(&td->td_slpcallout, CALLOUT_MPSAFE);
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
TAILQ_INSERT_HEAD(&p->p_threads, td, td_plist);
|
|
|
|
p->p_numthreads++;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2004-10-05 20:39:26 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Convert a process with one thread to an unthreaded process.
|
|
|
|
* Called from:
|
|
|
|
* thread_single(exit) (called from execve and exit)
|
|
|
|
* kse_exit() XXX may need cleaning up wrt KSE stuff
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
thread_unthread(struct thread *td)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct proc *p = td->td_proc;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KASSERT((p->p_numthreads == 1), ("Unthreading with >1 threads"));
|
2006-10-26 21:42:22 +00:00
|
|
|
#ifdef KSE
|
2004-10-05 20:39:26 +00:00
|
|
|
upcall_remove(td);
|
|
|
|
p->p_flag &= ~(P_SA|P_HADTHREADS);
|
|
|
|
td->td_mailbox = NULL;
|
|
|
|
td->td_pflags &= ~(TDP_SA | TDP_CAN_UNBIND);
|
|
|
|
if (td->td_standin != NULL) {
|
2007-06-12 07:24:46 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_zombie(td->td_standin);
|
2004-10-05 20:39:26 +00:00
|
|
|
td->td_standin = NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2006-10-26 21:42:22 +00:00
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
p->p_flag &= ~P_HADTHREADS;
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
2004-10-05 20:39:26 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2004-09-05 02:09:54 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Called from:
|
|
|
|
* thread_exit()
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2003-04-18 00:16:13 +00:00
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
thread_unlink(struct thread *td)
|
2004-01-10 18:34:01 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2003-04-18 00:16:13 +00:00
|
|
|
struct proc *p = td->td_proc;
|
2003-04-23 18:46:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
PROC_SLOCK_ASSERT(p, MA_OWNED);
|
2003-04-18 00:16:13 +00:00
|
|
|
TAILQ_REMOVE(&p->p_threads, td, td_plist);
|
|
|
|
p->p_numthreads--;
|
|
|
|
/* could clear a few other things here */
|
2006-10-26 21:42:22 +00:00
|
|
|
/* Must NOT clear links to proc! */
|
2002-10-24 08:46:34 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Enforce single-threading.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Returns 1 if the caller must abort (another thread is waiting to
|
|
|
|
* exit the process or similar). Process is locked!
|
|
|
|
* Returns 0 when you are successfully the only thread running.
|
|
|
|
* A process has successfully single threaded in the suspend mode when
|
|
|
|
* There are no threads in user mode. Threads in the kernel must be
|
|
|
|
* allowed to continue until they get to the user boundary. They may even
|
|
|
|
* copy out their return values and data before suspending. They may however be
|
2006-06-30 08:10:55 +00:00
|
|
|
* accelerated in reaching the user boundary as we will wake up
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
* any sleeping threads that are interruptable. (PCATCH).
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
int
|
In original kern_execve() code, at the start of the function, it forces
all other threads to suicide, problem is execve() could be failed, and
a failed execve() would change threaded process to unthreaded, this side
effect is unexpected.
The new code introduces a new single threading mode SINGLE_BOUNDARY, in
the mode, all threads should suspend themself at user boundary except
the singler. we can not use SINGLE_NO_EXIT because we want to start from
a clean state if execve() is successful, suspending other threads at unknown
point and later resuming them from there and forcing them to exit at user
boundary may cause the process to start from a dirty state. If execve() is
successful, current thread upgrades to SINGLE_EXIT mode and forces other
threads to suicide at user boundary, otherwise, other threads will be resumed
and their interrupted syscall will be restarted.
Reviewed by: julian
2004-10-06 00:40:41 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_single(int mode)
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct thread *td;
|
|
|
|
struct thread *td2;
|
|
|
|
struct proc *p;
|
2004-06-18 06:15:21 +00:00
|
|
|
int remaining;
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
td = curthread;
|
|
|
|
p = td->td_proc;
|
2004-03-13 22:31:39 +00:00
|
|
|
mtx_assert(&Giant, MA_NOTOWNED);
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
PROC_LOCK_ASSERT(p, MA_OWNED);
|
|
|
|
KASSERT((td != NULL), ("curthread is NULL"));
|
|
|
|
|
2004-09-05 02:09:54 +00:00
|
|
|
if ((p->p_flag & P_HADTHREADS) == 0)
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
return (0);
|
|
|
|
|
2002-07-25 00:27:39 +00:00
|
|
|
/* Is someone already single threading? */
|
In original kern_execve() code, at the start of the function, it forces
all other threads to suicide, problem is execve() could be failed, and
a failed execve() would change threaded process to unthreaded, this side
effect is unexpected.
The new code introduces a new single threading mode SINGLE_BOUNDARY, in
the mode, all threads should suspend themself at user boundary except
the singler. we can not use SINGLE_NO_EXIT because we want to start from
a clean state if execve() is successful, suspending other threads at unknown
point and later resuming them from there and forcing them to exit at user
boundary may cause the process to start from a dirty state. If execve() is
successful, current thread upgrades to SINGLE_EXIT mode and forces other
threads to suicide at user boundary, otherwise, other threads will be resumed
and their interrupted syscall will be restarted.
Reviewed by: julian
2004-10-06 00:40:41 +00:00
|
|
|
if (p->p_singlethread != NULL && p->p_singlethread != td)
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
return (1);
|
|
|
|
|
In original kern_execve() code, at the start of the function, it forces
all other threads to suicide, problem is execve() could be failed, and
a failed execve() would change threaded process to unthreaded, this side
effect is unexpected.
The new code introduces a new single threading mode SINGLE_BOUNDARY, in
the mode, all threads should suspend themself at user boundary except
the singler. we can not use SINGLE_NO_EXIT because we want to start from
a clean state if execve() is successful, suspending other threads at unknown
point and later resuming them from there and forcing them to exit at user
boundary may cause the process to start from a dirty state. If execve() is
successful, current thread upgrades to SINGLE_EXIT mode and forces other
threads to suicide at user boundary, otherwise, other threads will be resumed
and their interrupted syscall will be restarted.
Reviewed by: julian
2004-10-06 00:40:41 +00:00
|
|
|
if (mode == SINGLE_EXIT) {
|
|
|
|
p->p_flag |= P_SINGLE_EXIT;
|
|
|
|
p->p_flag &= ~P_SINGLE_BOUNDARY;
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
p->p_flag &= ~P_SINGLE_EXIT;
|
|
|
|
if (mode == SINGLE_BOUNDARY)
|
|
|
|
p->p_flag |= P_SINGLE_BOUNDARY;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
p->p_flag &= ~P_SINGLE_BOUNDARY;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2002-09-05 07:30:18 +00:00
|
|
|
p->p_flag |= P_STOPPED_SINGLE;
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
PROC_SLOCK(p);
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
p->p_singlethread = td;
|
In original kern_execve() code, at the start of the function, it forces
all other threads to suicide, problem is execve() could be failed, and
a failed execve() would change threaded process to unthreaded, this side
effect is unexpected.
The new code introduces a new single threading mode SINGLE_BOUNDARY, in
the mode, all threads should suspend themself at user boundary except
the singler. we can not use SINGLE_NO_EXIT because we want to start from
a clean state if execve() is successful, suspending other threads at unknown
point and later resuming them from there and forcing them to exit at user
boundary may cause the process to start from a dirty state. If execve() is
successful, current thread upgrades to SINGLE_EXIT mode and forces other
threads to suicide at user boundary, otherwise, other threads will be resumed
and their interrupted syscall will be restarted.
Reviewed by: julian
2004-10-06 00:40:41 +00:00
|
|
|
if (mode == SINGLE_EXIT)
|
2004-06-18 06:15:21 +00:00
|
|
|
remaining = p->p_numthreads;
|
In original kern_execve() code, at the start of the function, it forces
all other threads to suicide, problem is execve() could be failed, and
a failed execve() would change threaded process to unthreaded, this side
effect is unexpected.
The new code introduces a new single threading mode SINGLE_BOUNDARY, in
the mode, all threads should suspend themself at user boundary except
the singler. we can not use SINGLE_NO_EXIT because we want to start from
a clean state if execve() is successful, suspending other threads at unknown
point and later resuming them from there and forcing them to exit at user
boundary may cause the process to start from a dirty state. If execve() is
successful, current thread upgrades to SINGLE_EXIT mode and forces other
threads to suicide at user boundary, otherwise, other threads will be resumed
and their interrupted syscall will be restarted.
Reviewed by: julian
2004-10-06 00:40:41 +00:00
|
|
|
else if (mode == SINGLE_BOUNDARY)
|
|
|
|
remaining = p->p_numthreads - p->p_boundary_count;
|
|
|
|
else
|
2004-06-18 06:15:21 +00:00
|
|
|
remaining = p->p_numthreads - p->p_suspcount;
|
|
|
|
while (remaining != 1) {
|
2006-03-21 10:05:15 +00:00
|
|
|
if (P_SHOULDSTOP(p) != P_STOPPED_SINGLE)
|
|
|
|
goto stopme;
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
FOREACH_THREAD_IN_PROC(p, td2) {
|
|
|
|
if (td2 == td)
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_lock(td2);
|
2003-04-19 04:39:10 +00:00
|
|
|
td2->td_flags |= TDF_ASTPENDING;
|
2002-09-11 08:13:56 +00:00
|
|
|
if (TD_IS_INHIBITED(td2)) {
|
In original kern_execve() code, at the start of the function, it forces
all other threads to suicide, problem is execve() could be failed, and
a failed execve() would change threaded process to unthreaded, this side
effect is unexpected.
The new code introduces a new single threading mode SINGLE_BOUNDARY, in
the mode, all threads should suspend themself at user boundary except
the singler. we can not use SINGLE_NO_EXIT because we want to start from
a clean state if execve() is successful, suspending other threads at unknown
point and later resuming them from there and forcing them to exit at user
boundary may cause the process to start from a dirty state. If execve() is
successful, current thread upgrades to SINGLE_EXIT mode and forces other
threads to suicide at user boundary, otherwise, other threads will be resumed
and their interrupted syscall will be restarted.
Reviewed by: julian
2004-10-06 00:40:41 +00:00
|
|
|
switch (mode) {
|
|
|
|
case SINGLE_EXIT:
|
Add code to support debugging threaded process.
1. Add tm_lwpid into kse_thr_mailbox to indicate which kernel
thread current user thread is running on. Add tm_dflags into
kse_thr_mailbox, the flags is written by debugger, it tells
UTS and kernel what should be done when the process is being
debugged, current, there two flags TMDF_SSTEP and TMDF_DONOTRUNUSER.
TMDF_SSTEP is used to tell kernel to turn on single stepping,
or turn off if it is not set.
TMDF_DONOTRUNUSER is used to tell kernel to schedule upcall
whenever possible, to UTS, it means do not run the user thread
until debugger clears it, this behaviour is necessary because
gdb wants to resume only one thread when the thread's pc is
at a breakpoint, and thread needs to go forward, in order to
avoid other threads sneak pass the breakpoints, it needs to remove
breakpoint, only wants one thread to go. Also, add km_lwp to
kse_mailbox, the lwp id is copied to kse_thr_mailbox at context
switch time when process is not being debugged, so when process
is attached, debugger can map kernel thread to user thread.
2. Add p_xthread to proc strcuture and td_xsig to thread structure.
p_xthread is used by a thread when it wants to report event
to debugger, every thread can set the pointer, especially, when
it is used in ptracestop, it is the last thread reporting event
will win the race. Every thread has a td_xsig to exchange signal
with debugger, thread uses TDF_XSIG flag to indicate it is reporting
signal to debugger, if the flag is not cleared, thread will keep
retrying until it is cleared by debugger, p_xthread may be
used by debugger to indicate CURRENT thread. The p_xstat is still
in proc structure to keep wait() to work, in future, we may
just use td_xsig.
3. Add TDF_DBSUSPEND flag, the flag is used by debugger to suspend
a thread. When process stops, debugger can set the flag for
thread, thread will check the flag in thread_suspend_check,
enters a loop, unless it is cleared by debugger, process is
detached or process is existing. The flag is also checked in
ptracestop, so debugger can temporarily suspend a thread even
if the thread wants to exchange signal.
4. Current, in ptrace, we always resume all threads, but if a thread
has already a TDF_DBSUSPEND flag set by debugger, it won't run.
Encouraged by: marcel, julian, deischen
2004-07-13 07:20:10 +00:00
|
|
|
if (td->td_flags & TDF_DBSUSPEND)
|
|
|
|
td->td_flags &= ~TDF_DBSUSPEND;
|
In original kern_execve() code, at the start of the function, it forces
all other threads to suicide, problem is execve() could be failed, and
a failed execve() would change threaded process to unthreaded, this side
effect is unexpected.
The new code introduces a new single threading mode SINGLE_BOUNDARY, in
the mode, all threads should suspend themself at user boundary except
the singler. we can not use SINGLE_NO_EXIT because we want to start from
a clean state if execve() is successful, suspending other threads at unknown
point and later resuming them from there and forcing them to exit at user
boundary may cause the process to start from a dirty state. If execve() is
successful, current thread upgrades to SINGLE_EXIT mode and forces other
threads to suicide at user boundary, otherwise, other threads will be resumed
and their interrupted syscall will be restarted.
Reviewed by: julian
2004-10-06 00:40:41 +00:00
|
|
|
if (TD_IS_SUSPENDED(td2))
|
2002-09-11 08:13:56 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_unsuspend_one(td2);
|
2002-10-25 07:11:12 +00:00
|
|
|
if (TD_ON_SLEEPQ(td2) &&
|
In original kern_execve() code, at the start of the function, it forces
all other threads to suicide, problem is execve() could be failed, and
a failed execve() would change threaded process to unthreaded, this side
effect is unexpected.
The new code introduces a new single threading mode SINGLE_BOUNDARY, in
the mode, all threads should suspend themself at user boundary except
the singler. we can not use SINGLE_NO_EXIT because we want to start from
a clean state if execve() is successful, suspending other threads at unknown
point and later resuming them from there and forcing them to exit at user
boundary may cause the process to start from a dirty state. If execve() is
successful, current thread upgrades to SINGLE_EXIT mode and forces other
threads to suicide at user boundary, otherwise, other threads will be resumed
and their interrupted syscall will be restarted.
Reviewed by: julian
2004-10-06 00:40:41 +00:00
|
|
|
(td2->td_flags & TDF_SINTR))
|
Fix a long standing race between sleep queue and thread
suspension code. When a thread A is going to sleep, it calls
sleepq_catch_signals() to detect any pending signals or thread
suspension request, if nothing happens, it returns without
holding process lock or scheduler lock, this opens a race
window which allows thread B to come in and do process
suspension work, however since A is still at running state,
thread B can do nothing to A, thread A continues, and puts
itself into actually sleeping state, but B has never seen it,
and it sits there forever until B is woken up by other threads
sometimes later(this can be very long delay or never
happen). Fix this bug by forcing sleepq_catch_signals to
return with scheduler lock held.
Fix sleepq_abort() by passing it an interrupted code, previously,
it worked as wakeup_one(), and the interruption can not be
identified correctly by sleep queue code when the sleeping
thread is resumed.
Let thread_suspend_check() returns EINTR or ERESTART, so sleep
queue no longer has to use SIGSTOP as a hack to build a return
value.
Reviewed by: jhb
MFC after: 1 week
2006-02-15 23:52:01 +00:00
|
|
|
sleepq_abort(td2, EINTR);
|
In original kern_execve() code, at the start of the function, it forces
all other threads to suicide, problem is execve() could be failed, and
a failed execve() would change threaded process to unthreaded, this side
effect is unexpected.
The new code introduces a new single threading mode SINGLE_BOUNDARY, in
the mode, all threads should suspend themself at user boundary except
the singler. we can not use SINGLE_NO_EXIT because we want to start from
a clean state if execve() is successful, suspending other threads at unknown
point and later resuming them from there and forcing them to exit at user
boundary may cause the process to start from a dirty state. If execve() is
successful, current thread upgrades to SINGLE_EXIT mode and forces other
threads to suicide at user boundary, otherwise, other threads will be resumed
and their interrupted syscall will be restarted.
Reviewed by: julian
2004-10-06 00:40:41 +00:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case SINGLE_BOUNDARY:
|
|
|
|
if (TD_IS_SUSPENDED(td2) &&
|
|
|
|
!(td2->td_flags & TDF_BOUNDARY))
|
|
|
|
thread_unsuspend_one(td2);
|
|
|
|
if (TD_ON_SLEEPQ(td2) &&
|
|
|
|
(td2->td_flags & TDF_SINTR))
|
Fix a long standing race between sleep queue and thread
suspension code. When a thread A is going to sleep, it calls
sleepq_catch_signals() to detect any pending signals or thread
suspension request, if nothing happens, it returns without
holding process lock or scheduler lock, this opens a race
window which allows thread B to come in and do process
suspension work, however since A is still at running state,
thread B can do nothing to A, thread A continues, and puts
itself into actually sleeping state, but B has never seen it,
and it sits there forever until B is woken up by other threads
sometimes later(this can be very long delay or never
happen). Fix this bug by forcing sleepq_catch_signals to
return with scheduler lock held.
Fix sleepq_abort() by passing it an interrupted code, previously,
it worked as wakeup_one(), and the interruption can not be
identified correctly by sleep queue code when the sleeping
thread is resumed.
Let thread_suspend_check() returns EINTR or ERESTART, so sleep
queue no longer has to use SIGSTOP as a hack to build a return
value.
Reviewed by: jhb
MFC after: 1 week
2006-02-15 23:52:01 +00:00
|
|
|
sleepq_abort(td2, ERESTART);
|
In original kern_execve() code, at the start of the function, it forces
all other threads to suicide, problem is execve() could be failed, and
a failed execve() would change threaded process to unthreaded, this side
effect is unexpected.
The new code introduces a new single threading mode SINGLE_BOUNDARY, in
the mode, all threads should suspend themself at user boundary except
the singler. we can not use SINGLE_NO_EXIT because we want to start from
a clean state if execve() is successful, suspending other threads at unknown
point and later resuming them from there and forcing them to exit at user
boundary may cause the process to start from a dirty state. If execve() is
successful, current thread upgrades to SINGLE_EXIT mode and forces other
threads to suicide at user boundary, otherwise, other threads will be resumed
and their interrupted syscall will be restarted.
Reviewed by: julian
2004-10-06 00:40:41 +00:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
if (TD_IS_SUSPENDED(td2)) {
|
|
|
|
thread_unlock(td2);
|
2002-10-25 07:11:12 +00:00
|
|
|
continue;
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2003-02-17 05:14:26 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2006-12-31 15:56:04 +00:00
|
|
|
* maybe other inhibited states too?
|
2003-02-17 05:14:26 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2004-11-05 22:40:33 +00:00
|
|
|
if ((td2->td_flags & TDF_SINTR) &&
|
|
|
|
(td2->td_inhibitors &
|
|
|
|
(TDI_SLEEPING | TDI_SWAPPED)))
|
2002-10-25 07:11:12 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_suspend_one(td2);
|
In original kern_execve() code, at the start of the function, it forces
all other threads to suicide, problem is execve() could be failed, and
a failed execve() would change threaded process to unthreaded, this side
effect is unexpected.
The new code introduces a new single threading mode SINGLE_BOUNDARY, in
the mode, all threads should suspend themself at user boundary except
the singler. we can not use SINGLE_NO_EXIT because we want to start from
a clean state if execve() is successful, suspending other threads at unknown
point and later resuming them from there and forcing them to exit at user
boundary may cause the process to start from a dirty state. If execve() is
successful, current thread upgrades to SINGLE_EXIT mode and forces other
threads to suicide at user boundary, otherwise, other threads will be resumed
and their interrupted syscall will be restarted.
Reviewed by: julian
2004-10-06 00:40:41 +00:00
|
|
|
break;
|
2002-09-11 08:13:56 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2006-02-13 03:16:55 +00:00
|
|
|
#ifdef SMP
|
|
|
|
else if (TD_IS_RUNNING(td2) && td != td2) {
|
|
|
|
forward_signal(td2);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_unlock(td2);
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
In original kern_execve() code, at the start of the function, it forces
all other threads to suicide, problem is execve() could be failed, and
a failed execve() would change threaded process to unthreaded, this side
effect is unexpected.
The new code introduces a new single threading mode SINGLE_BOUNDARY, in
the mode, all threads should suspend themself at user boundary except
the singler. we can not use SINGLE_NO_EXIT because we want to start from
a clean state if execve() is successful, suspending other threads at unknown
point and later resuming them from there and forcing them to exit at user
boundary may cause the process to start from a dirty state. If execve() is
successful, current thread upgrades to SINGLE_EXIT mode and forces other
threads to suicide at user boundary, otherwise, other threads will be resumed
and their interrupted syscall will be restarted.
Reviewed by: julian
2004-10-06 00:40:41 +00:00
|
|
|
if (mode == SINGLE_EXIT)
|
2004-06-18 06:15:21 +00:00
|
|
|
remaining = p->p_numthreads;
|
In original kern_execve() code, at the start of the function, it forces
all other threads to suicide, problem is execve() could be failed, and
a failed execve() would change threaded process to unthreaded, this side
effect is unexpected.
The new code introduces a new single threading mode SINGLE_BOUNDARY, in
the mode, all threads should suspend themself at user boundary except
the singler. we can not use SINGLE_NO_EXIT because we want to start from
a clean state if execve() is successful, suspending other threads at unknown
point and later resuming them from there and forcing them to exit at user
boundary may cause the process to start from a dirty state. If execve() is
successful, current thread upgrades to SINGLE_EXIT mode and forces other
threads to suicide at user boundary, otherwise, other threads will be resumed
and their interrupted syscall will be restarted.
Reviewed by: julian
2004-10-06 00:40:41 +00:00
|
|
|
else if (mode == SINGLE_BOUNDARY)
|
|
|
|
remaining = p->p_numthreads - p->p_boundary_count;
|
2004-06-18 06:15:21 +00:00
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
remaining = p->p_numthreads - p->p_suspcount;
|
|
|
|
|
2004-01-10 18:34:01 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Maybe we suspended some threads.. was it enough?
|
2002-10-25 07:11:12 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2004-06-18 06:15:21 +00:00
|
|
|
if (remaining == 1)
|
2002-10-25 07:11:12 +00:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-21 10:05:15 +00:00
|
|
|
stopme:
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Wake us up when everyone else has suspended.
|
2002-07-25 00:27:39 +00:00
|
|
|
* In the mean time we suspend as well.
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_suspend_switch(td);
|
In original kern_execve() code, at the start of the function, it forces
all other threads to suicide, problem is execve() could be failed, and
a failed execve() would change threaded process to unthreaded, this side
effect is unexpected.
The new code introduces a new single threading mode SINGLE_BOUNDARY, in
the mode, all threads should suspend themself at user boundary except
the singler. we can not use SINGLE_NO_EXIT because we want to start from
a clean state if execve() is successful, suspending other threads at unknown
point and later resuming them from there and forcing them to exit at user
boundary may cause the process to start from a dirty state. If execve() is
successful, current thread upgrades to SINGLE_EXIT mode and forces other
threads to suicide at user boundary, otherwise, other threads will be resumed
and their interrupted syscall will be restarted.
Reviewed by: julian
2004-10-06 00:40:41 +00:00
|
|
|
if (mode == SINGLE_EXIT)
|
2004-06-18 06:15:21 +00:00
|
|
|
remaining = p->p_numthreads;
|
In original kern_execve() code, at the start of the function, it forces
all other threads to suicide, problem is execve() could be failed, and
a failed execve() would change threaded process to unthreaded, this side
effect is unexpected.
The new code introduces a new single threading mode SINGLE_BOUNDARY, in
the mode, all threads should suspend themself at user boundary except
the singler. we can not use SINGLE_NO_EXIT because we want to start from
a clean state if execve() is successful, suspending other threads at unknown
point and later resuming them from there and forcing them to exit at user
boundary may cause the process to start from a dirty state. If execve() is
successful, current thread upgrades to SINGLE_EXIT mode and forces other
threads to suicide at user boundary, otherwise, other threads will be resumed
and their interrupted syscall will be restarted.
Reviewed by: julian
2004-10-06 00:40:41 +00:00
|
|
|
else if (mode == SINGLE_BOUNDARY)
|
|
|
|
remaining = p->p_numthreads - p->p_boundary_count;
|
2004-06-18 06:15:21 +00:00
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
remaining = p->p_numthreads - p->p_suspcount;
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
In original kern_execve() code, at the start of the function, it forces
all other threads to suicide, problem is execve() could be failed, and
a failed execve() would change threaded process to unthreaded, this side
effect is unexpected.
The new code introduces a new single threading mode SINGLE_BOUNDARY, in
the mode, all threads should suspend themself at user boundary except
the singler. we can not use SINGLE_NO_EXIT because we want to start from
a clean state if execve() is successful, suspending other threads at unknown
point and later resuming them from there and forcing them to exit at user
boundary may cause the process to start from a dirty state. If execve() is
successful, current thread upgrades to SINGLE_EXIT mode and forces other
threads to suicide at user boundary, otherwise, other threads will be resumed
and their interrupted syscall will be restarted.
Reviewed by: julian
2004-10-06 00:40:41 +00:00
|
|
|
if (mode == SINGLE_EXIT) {
|
2004-09-15 18:39:09 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* We have gotten rid of all the other threads and we
|
|
|
|
* are about to either exit or exec. In either case,
|
|
|
|
* we try our utmost to revert to being a non-threaded
|
|
|
|
* process.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2004-09-05 02:09:54 +00:00
|
|
|
p->p_singlethread = NULL;
|
2004-11-05 22:31:20 +00:00
|
|
|
p->p_flag &= ~(P_STOPPED_SINGLE | P_SINGLE_EXIT);
|
2004-10-05 20:39:26 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_unthread(td);
|
2003-02-17 05:14:26 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
PROC_SUNLOCK(p);
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
return (0);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Called in from locations that can safely check to see
|
|
|
|
* whether we have to suspend or at least throttle for a
|
|
|
|
* single-thread event (e.g. fork).
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Such locations include userret().
|
|
|
|
* If the "return_instead" argument is non zero, the thread must be able to
|
|
|
|
* accept 0 (caller may continue), or 1 (caller must abort) as a result.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* The 'return_instead' argument tells the function if it may do a
|
|
|
|
* thread_exit() or suspend, or whether the caller must abort and back
|
|
|
|
* out instead.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* If the thread that set the single_threading request has set the
|
|
|
|
* P_SINGLE_EXIT bit in the process flags then this call will never return
|
|
|
|
* if 'return_instead' is false, but will exit.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* P_SINGLE_EXIT | return_instead == 0| return_instead != 0
|
|
|
|
*---------------+--------------------+---------------------
|
|
|
|
* 0 | returns 0 | returns 0 or 1
|
|
|
|
* | when ST ends | immediatly
|
|
|
|
*---------------+--------------------+---------------------
|
|
|
|
* 1 | thread exits | returns 1
|
|
|
|
* | | immediatly
|
|
|
|
* 0 = thread_exit() or suspension ok,
|
|
|
|
* other = return error instead of stopping the thread.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* While a full suspension is under effect, even a single threading
|
|
|
|
* thread would be suspended if it made this call (but it shouldn't).
|
|
|
|
* This call should only be made from places where
|
2004-01-10 18:34:01 +00:00
|
|
|
* thread_exit() would be safe as that may be the outcome unless
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
* return_instead is set.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
int
|
|
|
|
thread_suspend_check(int return_instead)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2002-10-05 04:35:59 +00:00
|
|
|
struct thread *td;
|
|
|
|
struct proc *p;
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
td = curthread;
|
|
|
|
p = td->td_proc;
|
2004-03-13 22:31:39 +00:00
|
|
|
mtx_assert(&Giant, MA_NOTOWNED);
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
PROC_LOCK_ASSERT(p, MA_OWNED);
|
Add code to support debugging threaded process.
1. Add tm_lwpid into kse_thr_mailbox to indicate which kernel
thread current user thread is running on. Add tm_dflags into
kse_thr_mailbox, the flags is written by debugger, it tells
UTS and kernel what should be done when the process is being
debugged, current, there two flags TMDF_SSTEP and TMDF_DONOTRUNUSER.
TMDF_SSTEP is used to tell kernel to turn on single stepping,
or turn off if it is not set.
TMDF_DONOTRUNUSER is used to tell kernel to schedule upcall
whenever possible, to UTS, it means do not run the user thread
until debugger clears it, this behaviour is necessary because
gdb wants to resume only one thread when the thread's pc is
at a breakpoint, and thread needs to go forward, in order to
avoid other threads sneak pass the breakpoints, it needs to remove
breakpoint, only wants one thread to go. Also, add km_lwp to
kse_mailbox, the lwp id is copied to kse_thr_mailbox at context
switch time when process is not being debugged, so when process
is attached, debugger can map kernel thread to user thread.
2. Add p_xthread to proc strcuture and td_xsig to thread structure.
p_xthread is used by a thread when it wants to report event
to debugger, every thread can set the pointer, especially, when
it is used in ptracestop, it is the last thread reporting event
will win the race. Every thread has a td_xsig to exchange signal
with debugger, thread uses TDF_XSIG flag to indicate it is reporting
signal to debugger, if the flag is not cleared, thread will keep
retrying until it is cleared by debugger, p_xthread may be
used by debugger to indicate CURRENT thread. The p_xstat is still
in proc structure to keep wait() to work, in future, we may
just use td_xsig.
3. Add TDF_DBSUSPEND flag, the flag is used by debugger to suspend
a thread. When process stops, debugger can set the flag for
thread, thread will check the flag in thread_suspend_check,
enters a loop, unless it is cleared by debugger, process is
detached or process is existing. The flag is also checked in
ptracestop, so debugger can temporarily suspend a thread even
if the thread wants to exchange signal.
4. Current, in ptrace, we always resume all threads, but if a thread
has already a TDF_DBSUSPEND flag set by debugger, it won't run.
Encouraged by: marcel, julian, deischen
2004-07-13 07:20:10 +00:00
|
|
|
while (P_SHOULDSTOP(p) ||
|
|
|
|
((p->p_flag & P_TRACED) && (td->td_flags & TDF_DBSUSPEND))) {
|
2002-09-05 07:30:18 +00:00
|
|
|
if (P_SHOULDSTOP(p) == P_STOPPED_SINGLE) {
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
KASSERT(p->p_singlethread != NULL,
|
|
|
|
("singlethread not set"));
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2002-07-25 00:27:39 +00:00
|
|
|
* The only suspension in action is a
|
|
|
|
* single-threading. Single threader need not stop.
|
2004-01-10 18:34:01 +00:00
|
|
|
* XXX Should be safe to access unlocked
|
2002-07-24 23:21:05 +00:00
|
|
|
* as it can only be set to be true by us.
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2002-07-25 00:27:39 +00:00
|
|
|
if (p->p_singlethread == td)
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
return (0); /* Exempt from stopping. */
|
2004-01-10 18:34:01 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2004-08-29 23:10:02 +00:00
|
|
|
if ((p->p_flag & P_SINGLE_EXIT) && return_instead)
|
Fix a long standing race between sleep queue and thread
suspension code. When a thread A is going to sleep, it calls
sleepq_catch_signals() to detect any pending signals or thread
suspension request, if nothing happens, it returns without
holding process lock or scheduler lock, this opens a race
window which allows thread B to come in and do process
suspension work, however since A is still at running state,
thread B can do nothing to A, thread A continues, and puts
itself into actually sleeping state, but B has never seen it,
and it sits there forever until B is woken up by other threads
sometimes later(this can be very long delay or never
happen). Fix this bug by forcing sleepq_catch_signals to
return with scheduler lock held.
Fix sleepq_abort() by passing it an interrupted code, previously,
it worked as wakeup_one(), and the interruption can not be
identified correctly by sleep queue code when the sleeping
thread is resumed.
Let thread_suspend_check() returns EINTR or ERESTART, so sleep
queue no longer has to use SIGSTOP as a hack to build a return
value.
Reviewed by: jhb
MFC after: 1 week
2006-02-15 23:52:01 +00:00
|
|
|
return (EINTR);
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
In original kern_execve() code, at the start of the function, it forces
all other threads to suicide, problem is execve() could be failed, and
a failed execve() would change threaded process to unthreaded, this side
effect is unexpected.
The new code introduces a new single threading mode SINGLE_BOUNDARY, in
the mode, all threads should suspend themself at user boundary except
the singler. we can not use SINGLE_NO_EXIT because we want to start from
a clean state if execve() is successful, suspending other threads at unknown
point and later resuming them from there and forcing them to exit at user
boundary may cause the process to start from a dirty state. If execve() is
successful, current thread upgrades to SINGLE_EXIT mode and forces other
threads to suicide at user boundary, otherwise, other threads will be resumed
and their interrupted syscall will be restarted.
Reviewed by: julian
2004-10-06 00:40:41 +00:00
|
|
|
/* Should we goto user boundary if we didn't come from there? */
|
|
|
|
if (P_SHOULDSTOP(p) == P_STOPPED_SINGLE &&
|
|
|
|
(p->p_flag & P_SINGLE_BOUNDARY) && return_instead)
|
Fix a long standing race between sleep queue and thread
suspension code. When a thread A is going to sleep, it calls
sleepq_catch_signals() to detect any pending signals or thread
suspension request, if nothing happens, it returns without
holding process lock or scheduler lock, this opens a race
window which allows thread B to come in and do process
suspension work, however since A is still at running state,
thread B can do nothing to A, thread A continues, and puts
itself into actually sleeping state, but B has never seen it,
and it sits there forever until B is woken up by other threads
sometimes later(this can be very long delay or never
happen). Fix this bug by forcing sleepq_catch_signals to
return with scheduler lock held.
Fix sleepq_abort() by passing it an interrupted code, previously,
it worked as wakeup_one(), and the interruption can not be
identified correctly by sleep queue code when the sleeping
thread is resumed.
Let thread_suspend_check() returns EINTR or ERESTART, so sleep
queue no longer has to use SIGSTOP as a hack to build a return
value.
Reviewed by: jhb
MFC after: 1 week
2006-02-15 23:52:01 +00:00
|
|
|
return (ERESTART);
|
In original kern_execve() code, at the start of the function, it forces
all other threads to suicide, problem is execve() could be failed, and
a failed execve() would change threaded process to unthreaded, this side
effect is unexpected.
The new code introduces a new single threading mode SINGLE_BOUNDARY, in
the mode, all threads should suspend themself at user boundary except
the singler. we can not use SINGLE_NO_EXIT because we want to start from
a clean state if execve() is successful, suspending other threads at unknown
point and later resuming them from there and forcing them to exit at user
boundary may cause the process to start from a dirty state. If execve() is
successful, current thread upgrades to SINGLE_EXIT mode and forces other
threads to suicide at user boundary, otherwise, other threads will be resumed
and their interrupted syscall will be restarted.
Reviewed by: julian
2004-10-06 00:40:41 +00:00
|
|
|
|
1. Change prototype of trapsignal and sendsig to use ksiginfo_t *, most
changes in MD code are trivial, before this change, trapsignal and
sendsig use discrete parameters, now they uses member fields of
ksiginfo_t structure. For sendsig, this change allows us to pass
POSIX realtime signal value to user code.
2. Remove cpu_thread_siginfo, it is no longer needed because we now always
generate ksiginfo_t data and feed it to libpthread.
3. Add p_sigqueue to proc structure to hold shared signals which were
blocked by all threads in the proc.
4. Add td_sigqueue to thread structure to hold all signals delivered to
thread.
5. i386 and amd64 now return POSIX standard si_code, other arches will
be fixed.
6. In this sigqueue implementation, pending signal set is kept as before,
an extra siginfo list holds additional siginfo_t data for signals.
kernel code uses psignal() still behavior as before, it won't be failed
even under memory pressure, only exception is when deleting a signal,
we should call sigqueue_delete to remove signal from sigqueue but
not SIGDELSET. Current there is no kernel code will deliver a signal
with additional data, so kernel should be as stable as before,
a ksiginfo can carry more information, for example, allow signal to
be delivered but throw away siginfo data if memory is not enough.
SIGKILL and SIGSTOP have fast path in sigqueue_add, because they can
not be caught or masked.
The sigqueue() syscall allows user code to queue a signal to target
process, if resource is unavailable, EAGAIN will be returned as
specification said.
Just before thread exits, signal queue memory will be freed by
sigqueue_flush.
Current, all signals are allowed to be queued, not only realtime signals.
Earlier patch reviewed by: jhb, deischen
Tested on: i386, amd64
2005-10-14 12:43:47 +00:00
|
|
|
/* If thread will exit, flush its pending signals */
|
|
|
|
if ((p->p_flag & P_SINGLE_EXIT) && (p->p_singlethread != td))
|
|
|
|
sigqueue_flush(&td->td_sigqueue);
|
|
|
|
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
PROC_SLOCK(p);
|
2003-03-11 00:07:53 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_stopped(p);
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* If the process is waiting for us to exit,
|
|
|
|
* this thread should just suicide.
|
2002-09-05 07:30:18 +00:00
|
|
|
* Assumes that P_SINGLE_EXIT implies P_STOPPED_SINGLE.
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
In original kern_execve() code, at the start of the function, it forces
all other threads to suicide, problem is execve() could be failed, and
a failed execve() would change threaded process to unthreaded, this side
effect is unexpected.
The new code introduces a new single threading mode SINGLE_BOUNDARY, in
the mode, all threads should suspend themself at user boundary except
the singler. we can not use SINGLE_NO_EXIT because we want to start from
a clean state if execve() is successful, suspending other threads at unknown
point and later resuming them from there and forcing them to exit at user
boundary may cause the process to start from a dirty state. If execve() is
successful, current thread upgrades to SINGLE_EXIT mode and forces other
threads to suicide at user boundary, otherwise, other threads will be resumed
and their interrupted syscall will be restarted.
Reviewed by: julian
2004-10-06 00:40:41 +00:00
|
|
|
if ((p->p_flag & P_SINGLE_EXIT) && (p->p_singlethread != td))
|
2004-09-05 02:09:54 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_exit();
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
if (P_SHOULDSTOP(p) == P_STOPPED_SINGLE) {
|
|
|
|
if (p->p_numthreads == p->p_suspcount + 1) {
|
|
|
|
thread_lock(p->p_singlethread);
|
|
|
|
thread_unsuspend_one(p->p_singlethread);
|
|
|
|
thread_unlock(p->p_singlethread);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
PROC_UNLOCK(p);
|
|
|
|
thread_lock(td);
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* When a thread suspends, it just
|
2006-12-06 06:34:57 +00:00
|
|
|
* gets taken off all queues.
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2002-09-11 08:13:56 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_suspend_one(td);
|
In original kern_execve() code, at the start of the function, it forces
all other threads to suicide, problem is execve() could be failed, and
a failed execve() would change threaded process to unthreaded, this side
effect is unexpected.
The new code introduces a new single threading mode SINGLE_BOUNDARY, in
the mode, all threads should suspend themself at user boundary except
the singler. we can not use SINGLE_NO_EXIT because we want to start from
a clean state if execve() is successful, suspending other threads at unknown
point and later resuming them from there and forcing them to exit at user
boundary may cause the process to start from a dirty state. If execve() is
successful, current thread upgrades to SINGLE_EXIT mode and forces other
threads to suicide at user boundary, otherwise, other threads will be resumed
and their interrupted syscall will be restarted.
Reviewed by: julian
2004-10-06 00:40:41 +00:00
|
|
|
if (return_instead == 0) {
|
|
|
|
p->p_boundary_count++;
|
|
|
|
td->td_flags |= TDF_BOUNDARY;
|
|
|
|
}
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
PROC_SUNLOCK(p);
|
2004-07-02 19:09:50 +00:00
|
|
|
mi_switch(SW_INVOL, NULL);
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
if (return_instead == 0)
|
In original kern_execve() code, at the start of the function, it forces
all other threads to suicide, problem is execve() could be failed, and
a failed execve() would change threaded process to unthreaded, this side
effect is unexpected.
The new code introduces a new single threading mode SINGLE_BOUNDARY, in
the mode, all threads should suspend themself at user boundary except
the singler. we can not use SINGLE_NO_EXIT because we want to start from
a clean state if execve() is successful, suspending other threads at unknown
point and later resuming them from there and forcing them to exit at user
boundary may cause the process to start from a dirty state. If execve() is
successful, current thread upgrades to SINGLE_EXIT mode and forces other
threads to suicide at user boundary, otherwise, other threads will be resumed
and their interrupted syscall will be restarted.
Reviewed by: julian
2004-10-06 00:40:41 +00:00
|
|
|
td->td_flags &= ~TDF_BOUNDARY;
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_unlock(td);
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
PROC_LOCK(p);
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
if (return_instead == 0)
|
|
|
|
p->p_boundary_count--;
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return (0);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
thread_suspend_switch(struct thread *td)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct proc *p;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
p = td->td_proc;
|
|
|
|
KASSERT(!TD_IS_SUSPENDED(td), ("already suspended"));
|
|
|
|
PROC_LOCK_ASSERT(p, MA_OWNED);
|
|
|
|
PROC_SLOCK_ASSERT(p, MA_OWNED);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* We implement thread_suspend_one in stages here to avoid
|
|
|
|
* dropping the proc lock while the thread lock is owned.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
thread_stopped(p);
|
|
|
|
p->p_suspcount++;
|
|
|
|
PROC_UNLOCK(p);
|
|
|
|
thread_lock(td);
|
|
|
|
TD_SET_SUSPENDED(td);
|
|
|
|
PROC_SUNLOCK(p);
|
|
|
|
DROP_GIANT();
|
|
|
|
mi_switch(SW_VOL, NULL);
|
|
|
|
thread_unlock(td);
|
|
|
|
PICKUP_GIANT();
|
|
|
|
PROC_LOCK(p);
|
|
|
|
PROC_SLOCK(p);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
In the kernel code, we have the tsleep() call with the PCATCH argument.
PCATCH means 'if we get a signal, interrupt me!" and tsleep returns
either EINTR or ERESTART depending on the circumstances. ERESTART is
"special" because it causes the system call to fail, but right as it
returns back to userland it tells the trap handler to move %eip back a
bit so that userland will immediately re-run the syscall.
This is a syscall restart. It only works for things like read() etc where
nothing has changed yet. Note that *userland* is tricked into restarting
the syscall by the kernel. The kernel doesn't actually do the restart. It
is deadly for things like select, poll, nanosleep etc where it might cause
the elapsed time to be reset and start again from scratch. So those
syscalls do this to prevent userland rerunning the syscall:
if (error == ERESTART) error = EINTR;
Fake "signals" like SIGTSTP from ^Z etc do not normally invoke userland
signal handlers. But, in -current, the PCATCH *is* being triggered and
tsleep is returning ERESTART, and the syscall is aborted even though no
userland signal handler was run.
That is the fault here. We're triggering the PCATCH in cases that we
shouldn't. ie: it is being triggered on *any* signal processing, rather
than the case where the signal is posted to userland.
--- Peter
The work of psignal() is a patchwork of special case required by the process
debugging and job-control facilities...
--- Kirk McKusick
"The design and impelementation of the 4.4BSD Operating system"
Page 105
in STABLE source, when psignal is posting a STOP signal to sleeping
process and the signal action of the process is SIG_DFL, system will
directly change the process state from SSLEEP to SSTOP, and when
SIGCONT is posted to the stopped process, if it finds that the process
is still on sleep queue, the process state will be restored to SSLEEP,
and won't wakeup the process.
this commit mimics the behaviour in STABLE source tree.
Reviewed by: Jon Mini, Tim Robbins, Peter Wemm
Approved by: julian@freebsd.org (mentor)
2002-09-03 12:56:01 +00:00
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
thread_suspend_one(struct thread *td)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct proc *p = td->td_proc;
|
|
|
|
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
PROC_SLOCK_ASSERT(p, MA_OWNED);
|
|
|
|
THREAD_LOCK_ASSERT(td, MA_OWNED);
|
2003-03-11 00:07:53 +00:00
|
|
|
KASSERT(!TD_IS_SUSPENDED(td), ("already suspended"));
|
In the kernel code, we have the tsleep() call with the PCATCH argument.
PCATCH means 'if we get a signal, interrupt me!" and tsleep returns
either EINTR or ERESTART depending on the circumstances. ERESTART is
"special" because it causes the system call to fail, but right as it
returns back to userland it tells the trap handler to move %eip back a
bit so that userland will immediately re-run the syscall.
This is a syscall restart. It only works for things like read() etc where
nothing has changed yet. Note that *userland* is tricked into restarting
the syscall by the kernel. The kernel doesn't actually do the restart. It
is deadly for things like select, poll, nanosleep etc where it might cause
the elapsed time to be reset and start again from scratch. So those
syscalls do this to prevent userland rerunning the syscall:
if (error == ERESTART) error = EINTR;
Fake "signals" like SIGTSTP from ^Z etc do not normally invoke userland
signal handlers. But, in -current, the PCATCH *is* being triggered and
tsleep is returning ERESTART, and the syscall is aborted even though no
userland signal handler was run.
That is the fault here. We're triggering the PCATCH in cases that we
shouldn't. ie: it is being triggered on *any* signal processing, rather
than the case where the signal is posted to userland.
--- Peter
The work of psignal() is a patchwork of special case required by the process
debugging and job-control facilities...
--- Kirk McKusick
"The design and impelementation of the 4.4BSD Operating system"
Page 105
in STABLE source, when psignal is posting a STOP signal to sleeping
process and the signal action of the process is SIG_DFL, system will
directly change the process state from SSLEEP to SSTOP, and when
SIGCONT is posted to the stopped process, if it finds that the process
is still on sleep queue, the process state will be restored to SSLEEP,
and won't wakeup the process.
this commit mimics the behaviour in STABLE source tree.
Reviewed by: Jon Mini, Tim Robbins, Peter Wemm
Approved by: julian@freebsd.org (mentor)
2002-09-03 12:56:01 +00:00
|
|
|
p->p_suspcount++;
|
2002-09-11 08:13:56 +00:00
|
|
|
TD_SET_SUSPENDED(td);
|
In the kernel code, we have the tsleep() call with the PCATCH argument.
PCATCH means 'if we get a signal, interrupt me!" and tsleep returns
either EINTR or ERESTART depending on the circumstances. ERESTART is
"special" because it causes the system call to fail, but right as it
returns back to userland it tells the trap handler to move %eip back a
bit so that userland will immediately re-run the syscall.
This is a syscall restart. It only works for things like read() etc where
nothing has changed yet. Note that *userland* is tricked into restarting
the syscall by the kernel. The kernel doesn't actually do the restart. It
is deadly for things like select, poll, nanosleep etc where it might cause
the elapsed time to be reset and start again from scratch. So those
syscalls do this to prevent userland rerunning the syscall:
if (error == ERESTART) error = EINTR;
Fake "signals" like SIGTSTP from ^Z etc do not normally invoke userland
signal handlers. But, in -current, the PCATCH *is* being triggered and
tsleep is returning ERESTART, and the syscall is aborted even though no
userland signal handler was run.
That is the fault here. We're triggering the PCATCH in cases that we
shouldn't. ie: it is being triggered on *any* signal processing, rather
than the case where the signal is posted to userland.
--- Peter
The work of psignal() is a patchwork of special case required by the process
debugging and job-control facilities...
--- Kirk McKusick
"The design and impelementation of the 4.4BSD Operating system"
Page 105
in STABLE source, when psignal is posting a STOP signal to sleeping
process and the signal action of the process is SIG_DFL, system will
directly change the process state from SSLEEP to SSTOP, and when
SIGCONT is posted to the stopped process, if it finds that the process
is still on sleep queue, the process state will be restored to SSLEEP,
and won't wakeup the process.
this commit mimics the behaviour in STABLE source tree.
Reviewed by: Jon Mini, Tim Robbins, Peter Wemm
Approved by: julian@freebsd.org (mentor)
2002-09-03 12:56:01 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
thread_unsuspend_one(struct thread *td)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct proc *p = td->td_proc;
|
|
|
|
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
PROC_SLOCK_ASSERT(p, MA_OWNED);
|
|
|
|
THREAD_LOCK_ASSERT(td, MA_OWNED);
|
2006-12-06 06:34:57 +00:00
|
|
|
KASSERT(TD_IS_SUSPENDED(td), ("Thread not suspended"));
|
2002-09-11 08:13:56 +00:00
|
|
|
TD_CLR_SUSPENDED(td);
|
In the kernel code, we have the tsleep() call with the PCATCH argument.
PCATCH means 'if we get a signal, interrupt me!" and tsleep returns
either EINTR or ERESTART depending on the circumstances. ERESTART is
"special" because it causes the system call to fail, but right as it
returns back to userland it tells the trap handler to move %eip back a
bit so that userland will immediately re-run the syscall.
This is a syscall restart. It only works for things like read() etc where
nothing has changed yet. Note that *userland* is tricked into restarting
the syscall by the kernel. The kernel doesn't actually do the restart. It
is deadly for things like select, poll, nanosleep etc where it might cause
the elapsed time to be reset and start again from scratch. So those
syscalls do this to prevent userland rerunning the syscall:
if (error == ERESTART) error = EINTR;
Fake "signals" like SIGTSTP from ^Z etc do not normally invoke userland
signal handlers. But, in -current, the PCATCH *is* being triggered and
tsleep is returning ERESTART, and the syscall is aborted even though no
userland signal handler was run.
That is the fault here. We're triggering the PCATCH in cases that we
shouldn't. ie: it is being triggered on *any* signal processing, rather
than the case where the signal is posted to userland.
--- Peter
The work of psignal() is a patchwork of special case required by the process
debugging and job-control facilities...
--- Kirk McKusick
"The design and impelementation of the 4.4BSD Operating system"
Page 105
in STABLE source, when psignal is posting a STOP signal to sleeping
process and the signal action of the process is SIG_DFL, system will
directly change the process state from SSLEEP to SSTOP, and when
SIGCONT is posted to the stopped process, if it finds that the process
is still on sleep queue, the process state will be restored to SSLEEP,
and won't wakeup the process.
this commit mimics the behaviour in STABLE source tree.
Reviewed by: Jon Mini, Tim Robbins, Peter Wemm
Approved by: julian@freebsd.org (mentor)
2002-09-03 12:56:01 +00:00
|
|
|
p->p_suspcount--;
|
2002-09-11 08:13:56 +00:00
|
|
|
setrunnable(td);
|
In the kernel code, we have the tsleep() call with the PCATCH argument.
PCATCH means 'if we get a signal, interrupt me!" and tsleep returns
either EINTR or ERESTART depending on the circumstances. ERESTART is
"special" because it causes the system call to fail, but right as it
returns back to userland it tells the trap handler to move %eip back a
bit so that userland will immediately re-run the syscall.
This is a syscall restart. It only works for things like read() etc where
nothing has changed yet. Note that *userland* is tricked into restarting
the syscall by the kernel. The kernel doesn't actually do the restart. It
is deadly for things like select, poll, nanosleep etc where it might cause
the elapsed time to be reset and start again from scratch. So those
syscalls do this to prevent userland rerunning the syscall:
if (error == ERESTART) error = EINTR;
Fake "signals" like SIGTSTP from ^Z etc do not normally invoke userland
signal handlers. But, in -current, the PCATCH *is* being triggered and
tsleep is returning ERESTART, and the syscall is aborted even though no
userland signal handler was run.
That is the fault here. We're triggering the PCATCH in cases that we
shouldn't. ie: it is being triggered on *any* signal processing, rather
than the case where the signal is posted to userland.
--- Peter
The work of psignal() is a patchwork of special case required by the process
debugging and job-control facilities...
--- Kirk McKusick
"The design and impelementation of the 4.4BSD Operating system"
Page 105
in STABLE source, when psignal is posting a STOP signal to sleeping
process and the signal action of the process is SIG_DFL, system will
directly change the process state from SSLEEP to SSTOP, and when
SIGCONT is posted to the stopped process, if it finds that the process
is still on sleep queue, the process state will be restored to SSLEEP,
and won't wakeup the process.
this commit mimics the behaviour in STABLE source tree.
Reviewed by: Jon Mini, Tim Robbins, Peter Wemm
Approved by: julian@freebsd.org (mentor)
2002-09-03 12:56:01 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Allow all threads blocked by single threading to continue running.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
thread_unsuspend(struct proc *p)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct thread *td;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROC_LOCK_ASSERT(p, MA_OWNED);
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
PROC_SLOCK_ASSERT(p, MA_OWNED);
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!P_SHOULDSTOP(p)) {
|
2006-12-06 06:34:57 +00:00
|
|
|
FOREACH_THREAD_IN_PROC(p, td) {
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_lock(td);
|
2006-12-06 06:34:57 +00:00
|
|
|
if (TD_IS_SUSPENDED(td)) {
|
|
|
|
thread_unsuspend_one(td);
|
|
|
|
}
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_unlock(td);
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2002-09-05 07:30:18 +00:00
|
|
|
} else if ((P_SHOULDSTOP(p) == P_STOPPED_SINGLE) &&
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
(p->p_numthreads == p->p_suspcount)) {
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Stopping everything also did the job for the single
|
|
|
|
* threading request. Now we've downgraded to single-threaded,
|
|
|
|
* let it continue.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_lock(p->p_singlethread);
|
In the kernel code, we have the tsleep() call with the PCATCH argument.
PCATCH means 'if we get a signal, interrupt me!" and tsleep returns
either EINTR or ERESTART depending on the circumstances. ERESTART is
"special" because it causes the system call to fail, but right as it
returns back to userland it tells the trap handler to move %eip back a
bit so that userland will immediately re-run the syscall.
This is a syscall restart. It only works for things like read() etc where
nothing has changed yet. Note that *userland* is tricked into restarting
the syscall by the kernel. The kernel doesn't actually do the restart. It
is deadly for things like select, poll, nanosleep etc where it might cause
the elapsed time to be reset and start again from scratch. So those
syscalls do this to prevent userland rerunning the syscall:
if (error == ERESTART) error = EINTR;
Fake "signals" like SIGTSTP from ^Z etc do not normally invoke userland
signal handlers. But, in -current, the PCATCH *is* being triggered and
tsleep is returning ERESTART, and the syscall is aborted even though no
userland signal handler was run.
That is the fault here. We're triggering the PCATCH in cases that we
shouldn't. ie: it is being triggered on *any* signal processing, rather
than the case where the signal is posted to userland.
--- Peter
The work of psignal() is a patchwork of special case required by the process
debugging and job-control facilities...
--- Kirk McKusick
"The design and impelementation of the 4.4BSD Operating system"
Page 105
in STABLE source, when psignal is posting a STOP signal to sleeping
process and the signal action of the process is SIG_DFL, system will
directly change the process state from SSLEEP to SSTOP, and when
SIGCONT is posted to the stopped process, if it finds that the process
is still on sleep queue, the process state will be restored to SSLEEP,
and won't wakeup the process.
this commit mimics the behaviour in STABLE source tree.
Reviewed by: Jon Mini, Tim Robbins, Peter Wemm
Approved by: julian@freebsd.org (mentor)
2002-09-03 12:56:01 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_unsuspend_one(p->p_singlethread);
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_unlock(p->p_singlethread);
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2004-09-05 02:09:54 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* End the single threading mode..
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
thread_single_end(void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct thread *td;
|
|
|
|
struct proc *p;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
td = curthread;
|
|
|
|
p = td->td_proc;
|
|
|
|
PROC_LOCK_ASSERT(p, MA_OWNED);
|
In original kern_execve() code, at the start of the function, it forces
all other threads to suicide, problem is execve() could be failed, and
a failed execve() would change threaded process to unthreaded, this side
effect is unexpected.
The new code introduces a new single threading mode SINGLE_BOUNDARY, in
the mode, all threads should suspend themself at user boundary except
the singler. we can not use SINGLE_NO_EXIT because we want to start from
a clean state if execve() is successful, suspending other threads at unknown
point and later resuming them from there and forcing them to exit at user
boundary may cause the process to start from a dirty state. If execve() is
successful, current thread upgrades to SINGLE_EXIT mode and forces other
threads to suicide at user boundary, otherwise, other threads will be resumed
and their interrupted syscall will be restarted.
Reviewed by: julian
2004-10-06 00:40:41 +00:00
|
|
|
p->p_flag &= ~(P_STOPPED_SINGLE | P_SINGLE_EXIT | P_SINGLE_BOUNDARY);
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
PROC_SLOCK(p);
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
p->p_singlethread = NULL;
|
2002-08-22 21:45:58 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* If there are other threads they mey now run,
|
|
|
|
* unless of course there is a blanket 'stop order'
|
|
|
|
* on the process. The single threader must be allowed
|
|
|
|
* to continue however as this is a bad place to stop.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if ((p->p_numthreads != 1) && (!P_SHOULDSTOP(p))) {
|
2006-12-06 06:34:57 +00:00
|
|
|
FOREACH_THREAD_IN_PROC(p, td) {
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_lock(td);
|
2006-12-06 06:34:57 +00:00
|
|
|
if (TD_IS_SUSPENDED(td)) {
|
|
|
|
thread_unsuspend_one(td);
|
|
|
|
}
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
thread_unlock(td);
|
2002-08-22 21:45:58 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
PROC_SUNLOCK(p);
|
2002-06-29 07:04:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2004-04-28 20:36:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2005-11-03 01:34:08 +00:00
|
|
|
struct thread *
|
|
|
|
thread_find(struct proc *p, lwpid_t tid)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct thread *td;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROC_LOCK_ASSERT(p, MA_OWNED);
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
PROC_SLOCK(p);
|
2005-11-03 01:34:08 +00:00
|
|
|
FOREACH_THREAD_IN_PROC(p, td) {
|
|
|
|
if (td->td_tid == tid)
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
Commit 4/14 of sched_lock decomposition.
- Use thread_lock() rather than sched_lock for per-thread scheduling
sychronization.
- Use the per-process spinlock rather than the sched_lock for per-process
scheduling synchronization.
- Move some common code into thread_suspend_switch() to handle the
mechanics of suspending a thread. The locking here is incredibly
convoluted and should be simplified.
Tested by: kris, current@
Tested on: i386, amd64, ULE, 4BSD, libthr, libkse, PREEMPTION, etc.
Discussed with: kris, attilio, kmacy, jhb, julian, bde (small parts each)
2007-06-04 23:52:24 +00:00
|
|
|
PROC_SUNLOCK(p);
|
2005-11-03 01:34:08 +00:00
|
|
|
return (td);
|
|
|
|
}
|