mirror of
https://git.FreeBSD.org/src.git
synced 2024-12-17 10:26:15 +00:00
Add a new vnode flag VI_DOINGINACT to indicate that a VOP_INACTIVE
call is in progress on the vnode. When vput() or vrele() sees a 1->0 reference count transition, it now return without any further action if this flag is set. This flag is necessary to avoid recursion into VOP_INACTIVE if the filesystem inactive routine causes the reference count to increase and then drop back to zero. It is also used to guarantee that an unlocked vnode will not be recycled while blocked in VOP_INACTIVE(). There are at least two cases where the recursion can occur: one is that the softupdates code called by ufs_inactive() via ffs_truncate() can call vput() on the vnode. This has been reported by many people as "lockmgr: draining against myself" panics. The other case is that nfs_inactive() can call vget() and then vrele() on the vnode to clean up a sillyrename file. Reviewed by: mckusick (an older version of the patch)
This commit is contained in:
parent
f353c761f7
commit
6a1b2a22ef
Notes:
svn2git
2020-12-20 02:59:44 +00:00
svn path=/head/; revision=108399
@ -925,7 +925,8 @@ getnewvnode(tag, mp, vops, vpp)
|
||||
for (count = 0; count < freevnodes; count++) {
|
||||
vp = TAILQ_FIRST(&vnode_free_list);
|
||||
|
||||
KASSERT(vp->v_usecount == 0,
|
||||
KASSERT(vp->v_usecount == 0 &&
|
||||
(vp->v_iflag & VI_DOINGINACT) == 0,
|
||||
("getnewvnode: free vnode isn't"));
|
||||
|
||||
TAILQ_REMOVE(&vnode_free_list, vp, v_freelist);
|
||||
@ -2172,8 +2173,8 @@ vrele(vp)
|
||||
KASSERT(vp->v_writecount < vp->v_usecount || vp->v_usecount < 1,
|
||||
("vrele: missed vn_close"));
|
||||
|
||||
if (vp->v_usecount > 1) {
|
||||
|
||||
if (vp->v_usecount > 1 || ((vp->v_iflag & VI_DOINGINACT) &&
|
||||
vp->v_usecount == 1)) {
|
||||
v_incr_usecount(vp, -1);
|
||||
VI_UNLOCK(vp);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2183,13 +2184,20 @@ vrele(vp)
|
||||
if (vp->v_usecount == 1) {
|
||||
v_incr_usecount(vp, -1);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We must call VOP_INACTIVE with the node locked.
|
||||
* If we are doing a vput, the node is already locked,
|
||||
* but, in the case of vrele, we must explicitly lock
|
||||
* the vnode before calling VOP_INACTIVE.
|
||||
* We must call VOP_INACTIVE with the node locked. Mark
|
||||
* as VI_DOINGINACT to avoid recursion.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (vn_lock(vp, LK_EXCLUSIVE | LK_INTERLOCK, td) == 0)
|
||||
if (vn_lock(vp, LK_EXCLUSIVE | LK_INTERLOCK, td) == 0) {
|
||||
VI_LOCK(vp);
|
||||
vp->v_iflag |= VI_DOINGINACT;
|
||||
VI_UNLOCK(vp);
|
||||
VOP_INACTIVE(vp, td);
|
||||
VI_LOCK(vp);
|
||||
KASSERT(vp->v_iflag & VI_DOINGINACT,
|
||||
("vrele: lost VI_DOINGINACT"));
|
||||
vp->v_iflag &= ~VI_DOINGINACT;
|
||||
VI_UNLOCK(vp);
|
||||
}
|
||||
VI_LOCK(vp);
|
||||
if (VSHOULDFREE(vp))
|
||||
vfree(vp);
|
||||
@ -2225,7 +2233,8 @@ vput(vp)
|
||||
KASSERT(vp->v_writecount < vp->v_usecount || vp->v_usecount < 1,
|
||||
("vput: missed vn_close"));
|
||||
|
||||
if (vp->v_usecount > 1) {
|
||||
if (vp->v_usecount > 1 || ((vp->v_iflag & VI_DOINGINACT) &&
|
||||
vp->v_usecount == 1)) {
|
||||
v_incr_usecount(vp, -1);
|
||||
VOP_UNLOCK(vp, LK_INTERLOCK, td);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
@ -2234,13 +2243,17 @@ vput(vp)
|
||||
if (vp->v_usecount == 1) {
|
||||
v_incr_usecount(vp, -1);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We must call VOP_INACTIVE with the node locked.
|
||||
* If we are doing a vput, the node is already locked,
|
||||
* so we just need to release the vnode mutex.
|
||||
* We must call VOP_INACTIVE with the node locked, so
|
||||
* we just need to release the vnode mutex. Mark as
|
||||
* as VI_DOINGINACT to avoid recursion.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
vp->v_iflag |= VI_DOINGINACT;
|
||||
VI_UNLOCK(vp);
|
||||
VOP_INACTIVE(vp, td);
|
||||
VI_LOCK(vp);
|
||||
KASSERT(vp->v_iflag & VI_DOINGINACT,
|
||||
("vput: lost VI_DOINGINACT"));
|
||||
vp->v_iflag &= ~VI_DOINGINACT;
|
||||
if (VSHOULDFREE(vp))
|
||||
vfree(vp);
|
||||
else
|
||||
@ -2545,9 +2558,19 @@ vclean(vp, flags, td)
|
||||
if (active) {
|
||||
if (flags & DOCLOSE)
|
||||
VOP_CLOSE(vp, FNONBLOCK, NOCRED, td);
|
||||
if (vn_lock(vp, LK_EXCLUSIVE | LK_NOWAIT, td) != 0)
|
||||
panic("vclean: cannot relock.");
|
||||
VOP_INACTIVE(vp, td);
|
||||
VI_LOCK(vp);
|
||||
if ((vp->v_iflag & VI_DOINGINACT) == 0) {
|
||||
vp->v_iflag |= VI_DOINGINACT;
|
||||
VI_UNLOCK(vp);
|
||||
if (vn_lock(vp, LK_EXCLUSIVE | LK_NOWAIT, td) != 0)
|
||||
panic("vclean: cannot relock.");
|
||||
VOP_INACTIVE(vp, td);
|
||||
VI_LOCK(vp);
|
||||
KASSERT(vp->v_iflag & VI_DOINGINACT,
|
||||
("vclean: lost VI_DOINGINACT"));
|
||||
vp->v_iflag &= ~VI_DOINGINACT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
VI_UNLOCK(vp);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -214,6 +214,7 @@ struct xvnode {
|
||||
#define VI_DOOMED 0x0080 /* This vnode is being recycled */
|
||||
#define VI_FREE 0x0100 /* This vnode is on the freelist */
|
||||
#define VI_OBJDIRTY 0x0400 /* object might be dirty */
|
||||
#define VI_DOINGINACT 0x0800 /* VOP_INACTIVE is in progress */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* XXX VI_ONWORKLST could be replaced with a check for NULL list elements
|
||||
* in v_synclist.
|
||||
@ -376,14 +377,14 @@ extern void (*lease_updatetime)(int deltat);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Requires interlock */
|
||||
#define VSHOULDFREE(vp) \
|
||||
(!((vp)->v_iflag & (VI_FREE|VI_DOOMED)) && \
|
||||
(!((vp)->v_iflag & (VI_FREE|VI_DOOMED|VI_DOINGINACT)) && \
|
||||
!(vp)->v_holdcnt && !(vp)->v_usecount && \
|
||||
(!(vp)->v_object || \
|
||||
!((vp)->v_object->ref_count || (vp)->v_object->resident_page_count)))
|
||||
|
||||
/* Requires interlock */
|
||||
#define VMIGHTFREE(vp) \
|
||||
(!((vp)->v_iflag & (VI_FREE|VI_DOOMED|VI_XLOCK)) && \
|
||||
(!((vp)->v_iflag & (VI_FREE|VI_DOOMED|VI_XLOCK|VI_DOINGINACT)) && \
|
||||
LIST_EMPTY(&(vp)->v_cache_src) && !(vp)->v_usecount)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Requires interlock */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user