should be done in crypto_done rather than in the callback thread
o use this flag to mark operations from /dev/crypto since the callback
routine just does a wakeup; this eliminates the last unneeded ctx switch
o change CRYPTO_F_NODELAY to CRYPTO_F_BATCH with an inverted meaning
so "0" becomes the default/desired setting (needed for user-mode
compatibility with openbsd)
o change crypto_dispatch to honor CRYPTO_F_BATCH instead of always
dispatching immediately
o remove uses of CRYPTO_F_NODELAY
o define COP_F_BATCH for ops submitted through /dev/crypto and pass
this on to the op that is submitted
Similar changes and more eventually coming for asymmetric ops.
MFC if re gives approval.
were sometimes propagated using M_COPY_PKTHDR which actually did
something between a "move" and a "copy" operation. This is replaced
by M_MOVE_PKTHDR (which copies the pkthdr contents and "removes" it
from the source mbuf) and m_dup_pkthdr which copies the packet
header contents including any m_tag chain. This corrects numerous
problems whereby mbuf tags could be lost during packet manipulations.
These changes also introduce arguments to m_tag_copy and m_tag_copy_chain
to specify if the tag copy work should potentially block. This
introduces an incompatibility with openbsd which we may want to revisit.
Note that move/dup of packet headers does not handle target mbufs
that have a cluster bound to them. We may want to support this;
for now we watch for it with an assert.
Finally, M_COPYFLAGS was updated to include M_FIRSTFRAG|M_LASTFRAG.
Supported by: Vernier Networks
Reviewed by: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
do this avoid m_getcl so we can copy the packet header to a clean mbuf
before adding the cluster
o move an assert to the right place
Supported by: Vernier Networks
the mbuf allocator flags {M_TRYWAIT, M_DONTWAIT}.
o Fix a bpf_compat issue where malloc() was defined to just call
bpf_alloc() and pass the 'canwait' flag(s) along. It's been changed
to call bpf_alloc() but pass the corresponding M_TRYWAIT or M_DONTWAIT
flag (and only one of those two).
Submitted by: Hiten Pandya <hiten@unixdaemons.com> (hiten->commit_count++)
o fix #ifdef typo
o must use "bounce functions" when dispatched from the protosw table
don't know how this stuff was missed in my testing; must've committed
the wrong bits
Pointy hat: sam
Submitted by: "Doug Ambrisko" <ambrisko@verniernetworks.com>
from the KAME IPsec implementation, but with heavy borrowing and influence
of openbsd. A key feature of this implementation is that it uses the kernel
crypto framework to do all crypto work so when h/w crypto support is present
IPsec operation is automatically accelerated. Otherwise the protocol
implementations are rather differet while the SADB and policy management
code is very similar to KAME (for the moment).
Note that this implementation is enabled with a FAST_IPSEC option. With this
you get all protocols; i.e. there is no FAST_IPSEC_ESP option.
FAST_IPSEC and IPSEC are mutually exclusive; you cannot build both into a
single system.
This software is well tested with IPv4 but should be considered very
experimental (i.e. do not deploy in production environments). This software
does NOT currently support IPv6. In fact do not configure FAST_IPSEC and
INET6 in the same system.
Obtained from: KAME + openbsd
Supported by: Vernier Networks
