Abuse .for so that the variable expansion works inside the N modifier.
This won't be a simple abuse with the next version of bsd.doc.mk
which will support multi-value PRINTERDEVICE.
Don't gratuitously pipe thru a cat(1) if NODOCCOMPRESS.
Only create _stamp.extra when necessary.
Get rid of SOELIMPP and OBJS.
Use Groff version of soelim(1); we need its -I option
for the following to work.
Don't needlessly chdir to SRCDIR. Only a few documents
need CD_HACK, and those that need it either use refer(1)
or .PSPIC macro which internally uses the .psbb call.
Obtained from: mark
Pointy hat to: grog
Change msU macros to mU.
This is only a partial solution; the whole issue of building the
documentation needs to be revisited.
01.cacm 02.implement 03.iosys 04.uprog 06.Clang 15.yacc 16.lex 17.m4
Some of these produce a number of warnings. I don't want to remove
them yet, because some noble soul may decide to remove the cause of
the warnings, but they won't if it doesn't bite them.
Add Caldera license.
Approved by: David Taylor <davidt@caldera.com>
Make buildable under FreeBSD. This one was relatively easy, though it
still contains obscenities.
Add Caldera license.
Approved by: David Taylor <davidt@caldera.com>
Make buildable under FreeBSD.
This one's a real mess. It's full of undefined macros, and in one
place deliberately causes syntax warnings. I've decided against
taking out the undefined macros: they don't alter the format of the
output document, and maybe one day somebody will put in the macro
definitions.
Note that this file corrects a number of format errors which appear in
the O'Reilly 4.4BSD manual set.
Add Caldera license.
Approved by: David Taylor <davidt@caldera.com>
Make buildable under FreeBSD. This was relatively complicated: the
original text used the msU macros, which are available in a number of
different kinds. This version uses a number of mm-like macros,
including AL and BL, which just aren't available in ms, and the msU
macros I've found (even the ones in 4.4BSD) don't have them either. I
replaced them with ms constructs, which makes it format better than
the O'Reilly document, but I wasn't able to get the table of contents
(ms doesn't have that facility).
Add a prominent comment that this is not a reference for any modern
version of C.
