Bruce Evans 2504f76272 Commit my old fixes for cosmetic bugs in npxprobe() so that they aren't ... lost when the buggy code goes away completely: - don't assume that the npx irq number is >= 8. Rev.1.73 only reversed part of the hard-coding of it to 13 in rev.1.66. - backed out the part of rev.1.84 that added a highly confused comment about an enable_intr() being "highly bogus". The whole reason for existence of npxprobe() (separate from the main probe, npxprobe1()) is to handle the complications to make this enable_intr() safe. - backed out the part of rev.1.94 that modified npxprobe(). It mainly broke the enable_intr() to restore_intr(). Restoring the interrupt state in a nested way is precisely what is not wanted here. It was harmless in practice because npxprobe() is called with interrupts enabled, so restoring the interrupt state enables interrupts. Most of npxprobe() is a no-op for the same reason...		2001-10-16 12:55:38 +00:00
..
acpica	Now that this code is MD, we don't need the i386 ifdefs.	2001-09-07 03:00:30 +00:00
amd64	Commit my old fixes for cosmetic bugs in npxprobe() so that they aren't	2001-10-16 12:55:38 +00:00
conf	The faith(4) device is no longer a count device so don't specify a count.	2001-09-25 18:56:40 +00:00
include	Add missing includes of sys/ktr.h.	2001-10-11 17:53:43 +00:00
isa	Commit my old fixes for cosmetic bugs in npxprobe() so that they aren't	2001-10-16 12:55:38 +00:00
pci	It turns out that while Toshiba laptops don't want to route interrupts	2001-08-28 16:35:01 +00:00
Makefile	Update tags directive to reflect the new location of soft updates	2000-07-04 00:18:43 +00:00