mirror of
https://git.FreeBSD.org/src.git
synced 2024-11-21 07:15:49 +00:00
163cdf6a32
ktls_enable_rx() and ktls_enable_tx() have checks to return EALREADY if the socket already has KTLS enabled. However, these are done without any locks held and nothing blocks concurrent attempts to set the socket option. I believe the worst outcome of the race is leaked memory. Fix the problem by rechecking under the sockbuf lock. While here, unify the locking protocol for sb_tls_info: require both the sockbuf and socket I/O locks in order to enable KTLS. This means that either lock is sufficient for checking whether KTLS is enabled in a given sockbuf, which simplifies some refactoring further down the road. Note that the SOLISTENING() check can go away because SOCK_IO_RECV_LOCK() atomically locks the socket buffer and checks whether the socket is a listening socket. This changes the returned errno value, so update a test which checks it. Reviewed by: gallatin MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: Klara, Inc. Sponsored by: Stormshield Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D45674 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| atf_python | ||
| ci | ||
| etc | ||
| examples | ||
| freebsd_test_suite | ||
| include | ||
| sys | ||
| __init__.py | ||
| conftest.py | ||
| Kyuafile | ||
| Makefile | ||
| Makefile.depend | ||
| Makefile.inc0 | ||
| README | ||
src/tests: The FreeBSD test suite
=================================
Usage of the FreeBSD test suite:
(1) Run the tests:
kyua test -k /usr/tests/Kyuafile
(2) See the test results:
kyua report
For further information on using the test suite, read tests(7):
man tests
Description of FreeBSD test suite
=================================
The build of the test suite is organized in the following manner:
* The build of all test artifacts is protected by the MK_TESTS knob.
The user can disable these with the WITHOUT_TESTS setting in
src.conf(5).
* The goal for /usr/tests/ (the installed test programs) is to follow
the same hierarchy as /usr/src/ wherever possible, which in turn drives
several of the design decisions described below. This simplifies the
discoverability of tests. We want a mapping such as:
/usr/src/bin/cp/ -> /usr/tests/bin/cp/
/usr/src/lib/libc/ -> /usr/tests/lib/libc/
/usr/src/usr.bin/cut/ -> /usr/tests/usr.bin/cut/
... and many more ...
* Test programs for specific utilities and libraries are located next
to the source code of such programs. For example, the tests for the
src/lib/libcrypt/ library live in src/lib/libcrypt/tests/. The tests/
subdirectory is optional and should, in general, be avoided.
* The src/tests/ hierarchy (this directory) provides generic test
infrastructure and glue code to join all test programs together into
a single test suite definition.
* The src/tests/ hierarchy also includes cross-functional test programs:
i.e. test programs that cover more than a single utility or library
and thus don't fit anywhere else in the tree. Consider this to follow
the same rationale as src/share/man/: this directory contains generic
manual pages while the manual pages that are specific to individual
tools or libraries live next to the source code.
In order to keep the src/tests/ hierarchy decoupled from the actual test
programs being installed --which is a worthy goal because it simplifies
the addition of new test programs and simplifies the maintenance of the
tree-- the top-level Kyuafile does not know which subdirectories may
exist upfront. Instead, such Kyuafile automatically detects, at
run-time, which */Kyuafile files exist and uses those directly.
Similarly, every directory in src/ that wants to install a Kyuafile to
just recurse into other subdirectories reuses this Kyuafile with
auto-discovery features. As an example, take a look at src/lib/tests/
whose sole purpose is to install a Kyuafile into /usr/tests/lib/.
The goal in this specific case is for /usr/tests/lib/ to be generated
entirely from src/lib/.
--