check-meta: fix 'hasNoMaintainers' (#412184)
This commit is contained in:
commit
eb48029948
@ -110,9 +110,19 @@ let
|
||||
hasUnfreeLicense = attrs: hasLicense attrs && isUnfree attrs.meta.license;
|
||||
|
||||
hasNoMaintainers =
|
||||
# To get usable output, we want to avoid flagging "internal" derivations.
|
||||
# Because we do not have a way to reliably decide between internal or
|
||||
# external derivation, some heuristics are required to decide.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# If `outputHash` is defined, the derivation is a FOD, such as the output of a fetcher.
|
||||
# If `description` is not defined, the derivation is probably not a package.
|
||||
# Simply checking whether `meta` is defined is insufficient,
|
||||
# as some fetchers and trivial builders do define meta.
|
||||
attrs:
|
||||
(attrs ? meta.maintainers && (length attrs.meta.maintainers) == 0)
|
||||
&& (attrs ? meta.teams && (length attrs.meta.teams) == 0);
|
||||
(!attrs ? outputHash)
|
||||
&& (attrs ? meta.description)
|
||||
&& (attrs.meta.maintainers or [ ] == [ ])
|
||||
&& (attrs.meta.teams or [ ] == [ ]);
|
||||
|
||||
isMarkedBroken = attrs: attrs.meta.broken or false;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user