sternenseemann c85656eae6 maintainers/scripts/haskell: don't redundantly add C++ Nix to env ...

Since the shebang calls nix-shell, we can safely assume that Nix (Lix,
C++ Nix) is installed. Our scripts should support a wide enough range of
Nix versions so that using the “impure” version of the tool is not a
problem.

This works around #400784. My theory is that the Nix frontend commands
no longer work with older versions of the Nix daemon nor the Lix daemon
in our workloads.

2025-06-30 16:18:48 +02:00

..

dependencies.nix

…

hydra-report.hs

…

maintained-broken-pkgs.nix

…

maintainer-handles.nix

…

mark-broken.sh

maintainers/scripts/haskell: sort case- and locale-insensitively consistently

2025-05-05 22:13:07 +02:00

merge-and-open-pr.sh

maintainers/haskell/merge-and-open-pr.sh: target staging

2025-02-12 12:34:15 +01:00

regenerate-hackage-packages.sh

maintainers/scripts/haskell: don't redundantly add C++ Nix to env

2025-06-30 16:18:48 +02:00

regenerate-transitive-broken-packages.sh

maintainers/scripts/haskell: don't redundantly add C++ Nix to env

2025-06-30 16:18:48 +02:00

test-configurations.nix

…

transitive-broken-packages.nix

…

unbreak.nu

maintainers/scripts/haskell: add unbreak.nu script

2025-02-17 01:59:39 +01:00

update-cabal2nix-unstable.sh

haskellPackages.cabal2nix-unstable: 2024-12-04 -> 2024-12-22

2024-12-22 13:47:07 +01:00

update-hackage.sh

maintainers/scripts/haskell: don't redundantly add C++ Nix to env

2025-06-30 16:18:48 +02:00

update-stackage.sh

maintainers/scripts/haskell: don't redundantly add C++ Nix to env

2025-06-30 16:18:48 +02:00

upload-nixos-package-list-to-hackage.sh

maintainers/scripts/haskell: don't redundantly add C++ Nix to env

2025-06-30 16:18:48 +02:00