Alexey Dokuchaev 3e4a131b3b - BROKEN statement in r358925 is misleading: it seem that Boost is the one ... to blame: in v1.53 they had the following change in their headers: - explicit shared_array(T * p = 0): px(p), pn(p, deleter()) + shared_array() BOOST_NOEXCEPT : px( 0 ), pn() { } + template<class Y> + explicit shared_array( Y * p ): px( p ), pn( p, checked_array_deleter<Y>() ) + { + boost::detail::sp_assert_convertible< Y[], T[] >(); + } The solution is pretty simple: use default constructor instead of NULL when initializing a shared_array; it was the default anyway [1] - Add missing `pkgconfig' to USES, otherwise it won't find GTK+2 - Cleanup Makefile, sort the knobs, trim USE_GL (glut implies gl and glu) - Transfer maintainership to games@ team - Reword COMMENT and port description; add LICENSE (GPLv2) while here [1] http://www.luxrender.net/mantis/view.php?id=1368		2014-06-23 14:56:15 +00:00
..
files	- BROKEN statement in r358925 is misleading: it seem that Boost is the one	2014-06-23 14:56:15 +00:00
distinfo
Makefile	- BROKEN statement in r358925 is misleading: it seem that Boost is the one	2014-06-23 14:56:15 +00:00
pkg-descr	- BROKEN statement in r358925 is misleading: it seem that Boost is the one	2014-06-23 14:56:15 +00:00
pkg-message