(direct dispatch) in interrupt threads when the netisr in question
isn't already active. If a netisr is already active, or direct
dispatch is already in progress, we queue the packet for later
delivery. Previously, this option was disabled by default. I have
measured 20%+ performance improvements in IP packet forwarding with
this enabled.
Please report any problems ASAP, especially relating to stack depth or
out-of-order packet processing.
Discussed with: jlemon, peter
Sponsored by: DARPA, Network Associates Laboratories
was that accessing the status reg could occour too fast, confusing
the logic in the flash part. Could not have been located without:
HW donated by: Jonas Bülow <jonas@servicefactory.se>
callout has finished or is in progress. Also document that the
locking of the callout code for FreeBSD 5 has eliminated the 'or is in
progress' clause as a possibility and that such elimination is an
accident of the implementation and shouldn't be relied upon.
prior to invalidating the TLB to be certain that the processor doesn't
keep a cached copy.
Discussed with: pete
Paniced: tegge
Pointy Hat: The usual spot
evaluating them at compile time rather than at run time. As for x86
and amd64, this requires GCC and it's enabled only if __OPTIMIZE__ is
defined (ie, if at least -O is used).
Reviewed by: jake
Their purpose is to give explicit hints to the compiler to judge
the likelyhood of a test to succeed or fail. Not all architectures
have support for such optimizations, but for those who do, it can
give a nice performance improvement in hot loops.
Obviously, this should be used very rarely in very specific code.
Reviewed by: peter
Obtained from: OpenBSD
AcpiEnterSleepState() calling a long AcpiOsStall() with interrupts
disabled. This fix will instead be added to ACPI-CA.
PR:
Submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Approved by:
Obtained from:
MFC after:
the TLB and ~1600 if it is not. Therefore, it is more effecient to
invalidate the TLB after operations that use CMAP rather than before.
- So that the tlb is invalidated prior to switching off of a processor, we
must change the switchin functions to switchout functions.
- Remove td_switchout from the thread and move it to the x86 pcb.
- Move the code that calls switchout into swtch.s. These changes make this
optimization truely x86 specific.
then the mbuf has been consumed by a hook; otherwise beware of a null
mbuf return (gack). In particular the bridge was doing the wrong thing.
While in the ipv6 code make it's handling of pfil_run_hooks identical
to netbsd.
Pointed out by: Pyun YongHyeon <yongari@kt-is.co.kr>