5ebfa8de69
The main argument is that it is impossible to determine if %n evaluated or not when snprintf return 0, because it can happens for both n == 0 and n == 1. Although EOF here is good indication of the end of process, if n is decreased in the loop... Since it is already supposed in many places that EOF *is* negative, f.e. from Single Unix specs for snprintf "return ... a negative value if an output error was encountered" this not makes situation worse. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| amd64 | ||
| compat-43 | ||
| db | ||
| gen | ||
| gmon | ||
| i386 | ||
| locale | ||
| net | ||
| nls | ||
| quad | ||
| regex | ||
| rpc | ||
| stdio | ||
| stdlib | ||
| stdtime | ||
| string | ||
| sys | ||
| xdr | ||
| yp | ||
| Makefile | ||
| Makefile.inc | ||